<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Xato : Patch Management</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/tags/Patch+Management/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Patch Management</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>May’s IE Patch Causes Most Problems</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/2007/05/22/may-s-ie-patch-causes-most-problems.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 17:09:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:919583</guid><dc:creator>MB's Windows Security</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=919583</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/2007/05/22/may-s-ie-patch-causes-most-problems.aspx#comments</comments><description>I was playing around today with Google searches to see what has happened so far with May&amp;#8217;s patch releases. First of all, I simply did a Google search for the KB numbers of each patch to compare results of each. Here is a graph of the results: This...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/2007/05/22/may-s-ie-patch-causes-most-problems.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=919583" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/tags/Windows+Security/default.aspx">Windows Security</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/tags/Patch+Management/default.aspx">Patch Management</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/tags/IE/default.aspx">IE</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/tags/patch+releases/default.aspx">patch releases</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/tags/google+search/default.aspx">google search</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/tags/patch+issues/default.aspx">patch issues</category></item><item><title>Out-Of-Band IE Patch Coming Tuesday</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/2007/04/01/out-of-band-ie-patch-coming-tuesday.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 03:26:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:888671</guid><dc:creator>MB's Windows Security</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=888671</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/2007/04/01/out-of-band-ie-patch-coming-tuesday.aspx#comments</comments><description>In response to much attention on the ANI vulnerability in IE, Microsoft has decided to release security bulletin MS07-017 this Tuesday, a week earlier than scheduled. &amp;#8220;Microsoft is aware of the existence of a public attack utilizing the vulnerability...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/2007/04/01/out-of-band-ie-patch-coming-tuesday.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=888671" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/tags/Patch+Management/default.aspx">Patch Management</category></item><item><title>Microsoft Announces No Patches for March</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/2007/03/08/microsoft-announces-no-patches-for-march.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:36:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:888675</guid><dc:creator>MB's Windows Security</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=888675</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/2007/03/08/microsoft-announces-no-patches-for-march.aspx#comments</comments><description>Apparently because currently planned releases did not meet testing standards, Microsoft decided to postpone all patches for this month, so you can all let next Tuesday roll by like any other Tuesday Read More......(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/2007/03/08/microsoft-announces-no-patches-for-march.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=888675" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/tags/General/default.aspx">General</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/tags/Windows+Security/default.aspx">Windows Security</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/tags/Patch+Management/default.aspx">Patch Management</category></item><item><title>Don’t forget the KB’s</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/2006/12/14/don-t-forget-the-kb-s.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:57:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1564367</guid><dc:creator>MBs Windows Security</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1564367</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/2006/12/14/don-t-forget-the-kb-s.aspx#comments</comments><description>With Microsoft&amp;#8217;s ongoing improvements to the patch management process, you may find yourself letting automation take over on patch Tuesday. I sat down at my PC this morning and saw that it had rebooted because it automatically installed new updates...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/2006/12/14/don-t-forget-the-kb-s.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1564367" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/tags/Patch+Management/default.aspx">Patch Management</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/tags/Hardening/default.aspx">Hardening</category></item><item><title>MS06-061 Re-Release for Win2k</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/2006/10/19/ms06-061-re-release-for-win2k.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:54:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1564370</guid><dc:creator>MBs Windows Security</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1564370</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/2006/10/19/ms06-061-re-release-for-win2k.aspx#comments</comments><description>I post this because sometimes it is easy to overlook path re-releases, especially when they are off schedule. According to a Microsoft spokesperson, the original patch itself is not flawed, it just fails to correctly set the kill bit for the Microsoft...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/2006/10/19/ms06-061-re-release-for-win2k.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1564370" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/xato/archive/tags/Patch+Management/default.aspx">Patch Management</category></item></channel></rss>