http://msmvps.com/blogs/williamryan/archive/2005/04/26/44704.aspxThey could both be hoaxes but like her or hate her, Michelle Malkin is a pretty straight shooter as far as getting her facts straight. Assuming neither of them is a Dan Rather, which one pisses you off more? Personally it's close for me but I guess aenCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)http://msmvps.com/blogs/williamryan/archive/2005/04/26/44704.aspx#44787Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:28:00 GMTd67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:44787WilliamI would have to say the first one - especially if I was a resident of California. <br> <br>Bush holding hands with the Saudi is not that bad, in the Middle East, when a man holds another man's hand, it is a sign of trusted friendship - just make sure that the women are totally covered in their burkas and walking 6 feet behind then men, then everything will be all right. :\ <br> <br>OT: I would love to bang Michelle Malkin! Damn she is HOT! <br><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=44787" width="1" height="1">http://msmvps.com/blogs/williamryan/archive/2005/04/26/44704.aspx#44783Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:46:00 GMTd67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:44783WilliamProbably the second one - the first one is just a statement of fact. :) The second one shows just how badly the &quot;defender's of the faith&quot;* have sold out. I wish there was a rational political party to vote for... <br> <br>* yes, I mean that in both the ironic sense, and the Judas Priest literal sense.<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=44783" width="1" height="1">