Yet another Microsoft Anti-Discrimination blog

Published Mon, Apr 25 2005 14:54 | William

Well, I had to chime in.  Not because I care a  whole lot either way but because it's getting good.  Gary Cornell chimed in.....  Tobin's response was pretty interesting, one part in particular.  What if Bill and Steve decided to get saved at the First Baptist Church of Redmond and became devout Christians.  Would ANY of their current critics commend them if they decided to take the company into the political realm?  Or would any of them laud them for personally going to and lobbying for things that were consistent w/ their new found religion.  My guess is no.  WE'd be hearing a lot of bellyaching (fair or unfair, there'd be a lot of it) about sticking to business etc etc. 

I grew up in Miami and regularly vacationed in Key West.  As such, “gay” was pretty normal to me although not the way I personally roll.  I have a pretty live and let live attitude about all things gay.  But the point here ins't about Gay.  It's about company's taking political positions and as Gary posits, individuals doing things personally.  I think G is wrong here.   There is NO benefit to them doing something personally and not on behalf of microsoft because they ARE Microsoft.  If they did something that pissed a group off, that group , if they chose to retaliate will do so  against Microsoft either way. 

I'm kinda wishing that our national preoccupation with social engineering would go away.  Both sides, just stop it.  But fortunately (or unfortunately depending on your perspective), I eliminated EVERY Possible chance I ever had of holding office by the time I finished my first college semester. 

And I don't know, but something about this post just seems really - well- lame, even though I agree with him. Lame is the wrong word.  Contrived maybe. I don't know b/c I agree with Scoble but this post just rubbed me the wrong way.  Then again, this isn't the first time he's gotten on my nerves, but that's partially why I read him - because he's thought provoking.   But so Michael Earls and lately Michael has been pushing out better stuff.

Filed under:

Comments

# William said on April 26, 2005 1:44 PM:

Since I haven't posted in a while, I don't seem to stick to tech topics, and I must LOVE pissing people off I felt like chiming in but I need to collect my thoughts in a decent blog post.

There has actually been a couple of people who obviously understand the scenario but for the most part it's nothing but hateful rhetoric. This site and their comments proves it: http://americablog.blogspot.com/2005/04/take-action-microsoft-abandons-gays.html

Yeah, there are a lot of anti-gay comments which is stupid but the pro-gay comments are just as spiteful (if not more). What a sad state of affairs when people no longer blame those responsible to actually work out their issues. No one seems to know the truth yet they all claim they were somehow there during the meetings at Microsoft and understand that now companies decide legislation, not elected officials. I don't know about you but I would prefer a government that doesn't take money from companies to pass bills. A law should pass on it's own merit, not the amount of money that was shoved at it. All of those companies contributed and the bill was shot down. Where does that money go? You'd think we'd have less of a national debt with all of this crap going on but apparently money talks and BS walks?

I feel like pissing a couple hundred more people off. It seems only fair.

# William said on April 26, 2005 1:53 PM:

J: You know you're my boy and all -but I got a gripe with you. Are you ever going to blog again? You're getting a little slack there ;-). Probably a great subject for you to start blogging again on - it'll no doubt draw a good bit of traffic as well.

Cheers man - and BTW< I owe you a response regarding Atlanta, but I defintiely want to get together. I'll be spending the night and probably heading over to Morton's or Capital Grille - hopefully if I buy - you'll be willing to come hang out w/ me and Kim for a while?

# William said on April 27, 2005 7:00 PM:

I've got a gripe with myself over that. I'm a little too anal for my old blogging habits and I tend to read and comment on blogs rather than just trackback. I guess I need to get out of the habit of doing it, or have a better system.

Also the usual times I did blog was late at night, which got trumped by some work I was SEVERELY behind on. Severely is an understatement actually and every day I didn't get it done made me look worse. Now it's all out but my sleep habits and routine are all out of whack.

You're stayin' the night? Cool. I knew the drive would be a PITA if you were to stay a while. You don't have to buy for me to come and hang out. I was planning on hanging out as long as you were able or wanted to, as I cleared my schedule for the day just to handle the event. I'll keep my schedule open regardless of what happens because it's never too much for me to change things around. We can discuss specifics when it gets a little closer if you'd like.

Search

This Blog

Tags

Community

Archives

News

My other sites

Cool Stuff

Book Stuff

Security

ORM

Data Access

Funny Stuff

Compact Framework Stuff

Web Casts

My KnowledgeBase Articles

My MVP Profile

Design Patterns

Performance

Debugging

Remoting

My Fellow Authors

My Books

LINQ

Misc

Speech

Syndication

Email Notifications