http://msmvps.com/blogs/vcsjones/archive/tags/Silverlight/default.aspxTags: SilverlightenCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)http://msmvps.com/blogs/vcsjones/archive/2008/05/13/too-little-too-late.aspxWed, 14 May 2008 00:50:23 GMTd67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1622253vcsjones0http://msmvps.com/blogs/vcsjones/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1622253http://msmvps.com/blogs/vcsjones/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1622253http://msmvps.com/blogs/vcsjones/archive/2008/05/13/too-little-too-late.aspx#comments<p><a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/vcsjones/WindowsLiveWriter/TooLittleTooLate_12511/adobeupdate_2.png"><img style="border-right:0px;border-top:0px;margin:0px 10px 0px 0px;border-left:0px;border-bottom:0px;" border="0" alt="Adobe Logo, Flash Logo, and the Adobe name are used under fair use." align="left" src="http://msmvps.com/blogs/vcsjones/WindowsLiveWriter/TooLittleTooLate_12511/adobeupdate_thumb.png" width="181" height="146" /></a> I booted up my PC today and saw this nice message from Adobe telling me that there was an update for my Flash installation.</p> <p>I couldn&#39;t help but notice that one of the highlighted features was support for HD content. I can&#39;t help but feel that this is in response to Silverlight&#39;s support for High Definition content. I wonder though, is it too little too late? I&#39;ve heard a lot of stories from people about switching from Flash to Silverlight just for the support for HD. Now don&#39;t misunderstand me, I think this will be a huge hit for the Flash community, and definitely merits use.</p> <p>This means to me that Silverlight is doing something right, and is going to be able to hold its ground.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1622253" width="1" height="1">Silverlight