<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ab origine ... : researches</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/tags/researches/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: researches</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Norton’s quality of code in drivers</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/2009/07/07/norton-s-quality-of-code-in-drivers.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1698616</guid><dc:creator>V. S.</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>Life of every driver developer is complicated by the fact that the code you write should be stable (read: bugs free) and compatible with any other third party drivers. It is very important for any driver to be bugs free, as any error in kernel leads ...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/2009/07/07/norton-s-quality-of-code-in-drivers.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1698616" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/tags/troubleshooting/default.aspx">troubleshooting</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/tags/researches/default.aspx">researches</category></item><item><title>SMB traffic not captured in TDI filter driver</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/2008/10/09/smb-traffic-not-captured-in-tdi-filter-driver.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 06:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1650321</guid><dc:creator>V. S.</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>Recently I met a problem in one of my TDI filters when filtering SMB traffic. The filter driver was able to see outgoing TDI_CONNECT requests to 137 and 445 ports, but during the heavy file upload there was no TDI_SEND requests issued. Please read the...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/2008/10/09/smb-traffic-not-captured-in-tdi-filter-driver.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1650321" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/tags/troubleshooting/default.aspx">troubleshooting</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/tags/researches/default.aspx">researches</category></item><item><title>A case of mysterious BSOD at tcpip!TcpIndicateData+22b</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/2008/07/09/a-case-of-mysterious-bsod-at-tcpip-tcpindicatedata-22b.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1639999</guid><dc:creator>V. S.</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>1. The causes Recently I was observing strange BSODs on my Vista machine quite periodically when dealing with network applications: [...] Please, read the rest of this post at http://www.shcherbyna.com/?p=117...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/2008/07/09/a-case-of-mysterious-bsod-at-tcpip-tcpindicatedata-22b.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1639999" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/tags/reversing/default.aspx">reversing</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/tags/researches/default.aspx">researches</category></item><item><title>Bug in MSDN: TDI_EVENT_RECEIVE_DATAGRAM &amp; it's handler</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/2008/01/17/bug-in-msdn-tdi-event-receive-datagram-amp-it-s-handler.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:03:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1467706</guid><dc:creator>V. S.</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>If you ever wanted to handle TDI_EVENT_RECEIVE_DATAGRAM ( http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms801156.aspx ) event handler in TDI, you would notice that it&amp;#39;s declaration is a bit strange( http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms801622.aspx...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/2008/01/17/bug-in-msdn-tdi-event-receive-datagram-amp-it-s-handler.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1467706" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/tags/troubleshooting/default.aspx">troubleshooting</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/tags/researches/default.aspx">researches</category></item><item><title>DRIVER_VERIFIER_IOMANAGER_VIOLATION in Windows Server 2003 SP2 with latest updates ON</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/2008/01/16/driver-verifier-iomanager-violation-in-windows-server-2003-sp2-with-latest-updates-on.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1466150</guid><dc:creator>V. S.</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>Recently, I&amp;#39;ve received following error when trying to test my TDI filter driver on Server 2003 SP2 with latest updates ON: DRIVER_VERIFIER_IOMANAGER_VIOLATION (c9) Arguments: Arg1: 00000208, (Fatal error) This IRP is about to run out of stack locations...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/2008/01/16/driver-verifier-iomanager-violation-in-windows-server-2003-sp2-with-latest-updates-on.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1466150" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><enclosure url="http://msmvps.com/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.PostAttachments/00.01.46.61.50/2k03bug_5F00_illustration.zip" length="2521" type="application/x-zip-compressed" /><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/tags/troubleshooting/default.aspx">troubleshooting</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/tags/researches/default.aspx">researches</category></item><item><title>The case of Task Manager that does not kill</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/2007/12/20/the-case-of-task-manager-that-does-not-kill.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1407625</guid><dc:creator>V. S.</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><description>Quite long time ago, my friend Vadym Stetsiak described a bug of Task Manager , which allows to disallow (!) the killing of a process, if it&amp;#39;s name is lsass.exe. In order to test this bug, you can rename any executable file into lsass.exe, run it...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/2007/12/20/the-case-of-task-manager-that-does-not-kill.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1407625" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/tags/reversing/default.aspx">reversing</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/tags/troubleshooting/default.aspx">troubleshooting</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/v_scherbina/archive/tags/researches/default.aspx">researches</category></item></channel></rss>