<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Using a TransactionScopeActivity within a ReceiveActivity in a state machine workflow</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/theproblemsolver/archive/2008/08/13/using-a-transactionscopeactivity-within-a-receiveactivity-in-a-state-machine-workflow.aspx</link><description>Part 1 part 2 Part 3 Part 4 In two previous blog posts, part one and part two , I covered the fact that the ReceiveActivity and the TransactionScopeActivity don&amp;#39;t work together very well. I demonstrated this using a sequential workflow and did show</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Case Packers</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/theproblemsolver/archive/2008/08/13/using-a-transactionscopeactivity-within-a-receiveactivity-in-a-state-machine-workflow.aspx#1721756</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 06:18:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1721756</guid><dc:creator>Case Packers</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Many technological developments will give you, the customer, real advantages – using less film, using less energy and running faster production speeds reliably&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1721756" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Using a TransactionScopeActivity within a ReceiveActivity in a state machine workflow</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/theproblemsolver/archive/2008/08/13/using-a-transactionscopeactivity-within-a-receiveactivity-in-a-state-machine-workflow.aspx#1651694</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:43:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1651694</guid><dc:creator>...</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice site you have&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1651694" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Using a TransactionScopeActivity within a ReceiveActivity in a state machine workflow - The Problem Solver</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/theproblemsolver/archive/2008/08/13/using-a-transactionscopeactivity-within-a-receiveactivity-in-a-state-machine-workflow.aspx#1647894</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:10:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1647894</guid><dc:creator>Using a TransactionScopeActivity within a ReceiveActivity in a state machine workflow - The Problem Solver</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;Using a TransactionScopeActivity within a ReceiveActivity in a state machine workflow - The Problem Solver&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1647894" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>More on using a TransactionScopeActivity within a ReceiveActivity - The Problem Solver</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/theproblemsolver/archive/2008/08/13/using-a-transactionscopeactivity-within-a-receiveactivity-in-a-state-machine-workflow.aspx#1647892</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:09:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1647892</guid><dc:creator>More on using a TransactionScopeActivity within a ReceiveActivity - The Problem Solver</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;More on using a TransactionScopeActivity within a ReceiveActivity - The Problem Solver&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1647892" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>