http://msmvps.com/blogs/theproblemsolver/archive/2008/06/11/unit-testing-asynchronous-workflow-activities.aspxIn a previous blog post I demonstrated how TypeMock allowed us to mock out the workflow runtime infrastructure and create true unit tests for a workflow activity. Now this may not seems like a big deal but because most of the classes in the workflow runtimeenCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)http://msmvps.com/blogs/theproblemsolver/archive/2008/06/11/unit-testing-asynchronous-workflow-activities.aspx#1655637Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:17:35 GMTd67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1655637The Problem Solver<p>A while a go I write some posts about unit testing Windows Workflow foundation Activities, you can find</p> <img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1655637" width="1" height="1">http://msmvps.com/blogs/theproblemsolver/archive/2008/06/11/unit-testing-asynchronous-workflow-activities.aspx#1642392Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:17:55 GMTd67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1642392DESPINA PLEVRIA (Greece)<p>At FIRST, CONGRATS, ABOUT THE ARTICLE. THE DOMAIN OF THE WORKFLOWS COMBINED WITH AN OO APPROACH (CLASSES ETC) SEEMS QUITE REALISTIC.</p> <p>Secondly, questions of are those that have to be </p> <p>resolved indeed. </p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1642392" width="1" height="1">