<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SQLServer-QA.net - Knowledge Sharing Network (SSQA.net) : indexes</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: indexes</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>How fast you can obtain information about missing indexes? Its easy and quick!</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/sql2008/archive/2009/11/22/6113.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1741679</guid><dc:creator>&lt;P&gt;SqlServer-QA.net&lt;/P&gt;</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1741679</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1741679</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/sql2008/archive/2009/11/22/6113.aspx#comments</comments><description>On the subject line the process to find the answer is not a short one! By design SQL Server engine takes care when the query optimizer generates a query plan, it analyzes what are the best indexes for a particular filter condition. If the best indexes...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/sql2008/archive/2009/11/22/6113.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1741679" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/performance/default.aspx">performance</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/dmv/default.aspx">dmv</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/best+practice/default.aspx">best practice</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/execution+plan/default.aspx">execution plan</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/monitoring/default.aspx">monitoring</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/dbas/default.aspx">dbas</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/index+hint/default.aspx">index hint</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/view+server+state/default.aspx">view server state</category></item><item><title>TSQL tip on how much is the usage of database indexes?</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/t-sql/archive/2009/07/26/5817.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1710286</guid><dc:creator>&lt;P&gt;SqlServer-QA.net&lt;/P&gt;</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1710286</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1710286</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/t-sql/archive/2009/07/26/5817.aspx#comments</comments><description>Recently there hasn&amp;#39;t been much of SQL Server tasks for me, as most of the time I was involved on designing the solutions for larger installations - a 8 node cluster or VLDB configuration etc. Ok I admit that still it can be classified as SQL Server...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/t-sql/archive/2009/07/26/5817.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1710286" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/dmv/default.aspx">dmv</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/usage/default.aspx">usage</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/tsql/default.aspx">tsql</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/object_5F00_name/default.aspx">object_name</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/behaviour+changes/default.aspx">behaviour changes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/lookups/default.aspx">lookups</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/index+usage/default.aspx">index usage</category></item><item><title>SQL Server Deadlock and Trace Flag 1204 and 1222- a big question every time</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2009/03/17/interpretaion-of-sql-server-deadlock-and-trace-flag-1204.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:03:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1678624</guid><dc:creator>&lt;P&gt;SqlServer-QA.net&lt;/P&gt;</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1678624</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1678624</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2009/03/17/interpretaion-of-sql-server-deadlock-and-trace-flag-1204.aspx#comments</comments><description>I have seen few users out there thinks that Deadlocks in SQL Server is a bug which has not be corrected by Microsoft since its release! Even few times they get think that deadlocks and blocking are similar reactions in SQL Server, a typical situation...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2009/03/17/interpretaion-of-sql-server-deadlock-and-trace-flag-1204.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1678624" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/performance/default.aspx">performance</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/i_2F00_o/default.aspx">i/o</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/best+practices/default.aspx">best practices</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/locking/default.aspx">locking</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/deadlock/default.aspx">deadlock</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/monitoring/default.aspx">monitoring</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/beginner/default.aspx">beginner</category></item><item><title>Indexes and UPDATE STATISTICS differences and undocumented options - SQL Server 2005</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2009/01/16/update-statistics-undocumented-options.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1662402</guid><dc:creator>&lt;P&gt;SqlServer-Qa.net&lt;/P&gt;</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1662402</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1662402</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2009/01/16/update-statistics-undocumented-options.aspx#comments</comments><description>During an Usergroup meeting one user asked the question that why my query is affected with slow performance when the statistics are upto-date? When asked about the indexes the reply was why do you need indexes when you have updated statistics on all the...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2009/01/16/update-statistics-undocumented-options.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1662402" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/performance/default.aspx">performance</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/query/default.aspx">query</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/optimization/default.aspx">optimization</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/procedure/default.aspx">procedure</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/update+statistics/default.aspx">update statistics</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/monitoring/default.aspx">monitoring</category></item><item><title>SQL Server Performance - consideration on unique index or filtered index.</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/09/25/4555.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1648859</guid><dc:creator>SqlServer-QA.net</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1648859</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1648859</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/09/25/4555.aspx#comments</comments><description>It is no doubt that when a database consists &amp;#39; well-designed &amp;#39; indexes can reduce disk I/O operations and consume fewer system resources therefore improving query performance. You might be wondering I&amp;#39;m going back to basics for indexes! So...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/09/25/4555.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1648859" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/performance/default.aspx">performance</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/optimization/default.aspx">optimization</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexed+view/default.aspx">indexed view</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/statiscs+age/default.aspx">statiscs age</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/filtered/default.aspx">filtered</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/dml/default.aspx">dml</category></item><item><title>SQL Server - Have you observed DBCC SHRINKFILE operation performance, on huge databases?</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/04/25/4112.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1603805</guid><dc:creator>SSQA.net</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1603805</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1603805</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/04/25/4112.aspx#comments</comments><description>In general it is not a best practice to perform SHRINK database operation on a production server, atleast regularly! Sometimes it may be compulsory to keep them sized in order to ensure the disk storage is not compromised for any sudden changes to databases...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/04/25/4112.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1603805" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/memory/default.aspx">memory</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/databases/default.aspx">databases</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/cache/default.aspx">cache</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/cpu/default.aspx">cpu</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/monitoring/default.aspx">monitoring</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/operating+system/default.aspx">operating system</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/huge/default.aspx">huge</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/dbcc+shrinkfile/default.aspx">dbcc shrinkfile</category></item><item><title>SQL Server 2008 Spatial data - geography &amp; geometry, all in one</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/sql2008/archive/2008/03/20/3852.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1548584</guid><dc:creator>SSQA.net</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1548584</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1548584</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/sql2008/archive/2008/03/20/3852.aspx#comments</comments><description>Geography &amp;amp; Geometry has much significance in day to day life, within that as a data now you can manage within your Database using SQL Server 2008 new data type - spatial, this represents information about the physical location and shape of geometric...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/sql2008/archive/2008/03/20/3852.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1548584" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/2008/default.aspx">2008</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/labs/default.aspx">labs</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/data+capture/default.aspx">data capture</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/spatial/default.aspx">spatial</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/data+type/default.aspx">data type</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/links/default.aspx">links</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/new+features/default.aspx">new features</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/geometry/default.aspx">geometry</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/geography/default.aspx">geography</category></item><item><title>SQL Server 2005 Partitioned Tables and Indexes - learning curve</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2008/03/12/sql-server-2005-partitioned-tables-and-indexes.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1540826</guid><dc:creator>SSQA.net</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1540826</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1540826</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2008/03/12/sql-server-2005-partitioned-tables-and-indexes.aspx#comments</comments><description>When do you need data partitioning? The data you see in relational database may need such a strategy if the volume is huge, for instance the data to store event-log information having the schema such as: [Id] INT (make this primary key clustered), [Unit_Id...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2008/03/12/sql-server-2005-partitioned-tables-and-indexes.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1540826" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/performance/default.aspx">performance</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/data/default.aspx">data</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/backup/default.aspx">backup</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/bi/default.aspx">bi</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/database/default.aspx">database</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/statistics/default.aspx">statistics</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/partition/default.aspx">partition</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/monitoring/default.aspx">monitoring</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/strategy/default.aspx">strategy</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/data+warehouse/default.aspx">data warehouse</category></item><item><title>How long DBCC CHECKDB process runs on SQL Server instance?</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2008/02/14/how-long-dbcc-checkdb-process-runs-on-sql-server-instance.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1514157</guid><dc:creator>SSQA.net</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1514157</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1514157</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2008/02/14/how-long-dbcc-checkdb-process-runs-on-sql-server-instance.aspx#comments</comments><description>In order to keepup the database logical and physical integrity of all the objects, you must run the DBCC statement such as DBCC CHECKALLOC, DBCC CHECKTABLE and DBCC CHECKCATALOG. Overall you can do this with another statement DBCC CHECKDB that will avoid...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2008/02/14/how-long-dbcc-checkdb-process-runs-on-sql-server-instance.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1514157" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/blogs/default.aspx">blogs</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/maintenance/default.aspx">maintenance</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sqlskills/default.aspx">sqlskills</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/dbcc+checkdb/default.aspx">dbcc checkdb</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/integrity/default.aspx">integrity</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/consistency/default.aspx">consistency</category></item><item><title>SQL Server 2005 DMV - how it can help to consider whether index is useful or not?</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/02/04/3397.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1495120</guid><dc:creator>SSQA.net</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1495120</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1495120</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/02/04/3397.aspx#comments</comments><description>When it comes to performance, for a DBA indexes are the first one to come to mind in order to fine tune the tasks on the database. In this series we have already covered this huge topic of indexing and how best you can make use of Dynamic Management Views...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/02/04/3397.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1495120" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/performance/default.aspx">performance</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/dmv/default.aspx">dmv</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/dba/default.aspx">dba</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/performance+monitoring/default.aspx">performance monitoring</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/index+plan/default.aspx">index plan</category></item><item><title>SQL Server 2005 TSQL to obtain buffers by object (table, index) in the buffer cache?</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/t-sql/archive/2008/02/01/3365.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1490299</guid><dc:creator>SSQA.net</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1490299</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1490299</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/t-sql/archive/2008/02/01/3365.aspx#comments</comments><description>As a programmer interacting with SQL Server&amp;#39;s cache is not often needed, but when you do need to determine what is going on with the cache, or you simply need to flush the execution plans or data pages to tune a query, you now have the means to do...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/t-sql/archive/2008/02/01/3365.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1490299" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/memory/default.aspx">memory</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/dmv/default.aspx">dmv</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/cache/default.aspx">cache</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/buffer/default.aspx">buffer</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/table/default.aspx">table</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/tsql/default.aspx">tsql</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/configuration/default.aspx">configuration</category></item><item><title>How SQL Server manages when a database is created in terms of I/O and disk usage?</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2008/01/29/sql-server-i-o-threads-bpa.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1485595</guid><dc:creator>SSQA.net</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1485595</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1485595</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2008/01/29/sql-server-i-o-threads-bpa.aspx#comments</comments><description>One of the best features you have in the SQL Server is to create database data file (additional) on fly without having a slow performance affect on existing connections. But think about how SQL Server manages to use server threads for the data file that...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2008/01/29/sql-server-i-o-threads-bpa.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1485595" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/performance/default.aspx">performance</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/management/default.aspx">management</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/i_2F00_o/default.aspx">i/o</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sysmon/default.aspx">sysmon</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/disk+space/default.aspx">disk space</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/usage/default.aspx">usage</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/resource/default.aspx">resource</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/perflib/default.aspx">perflib</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/worker+threads/default.aspx">worker threads</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/task+manager/default.aspx">task manager</category></item><item><title>SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition - make data available while creating indexes on large tables!</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/01/25/3285.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1479776</guid><dc:creator>SSQA.net</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1479776</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1479776</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/01/25/3285.aspx#comments</comments><description>Though it is not a best practice to perform a CREATE INDEX on large tables during the online hours where you have number of users accessing the metadata of SQL Server database. Within SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition you can perform ONLINE indexes operation...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/01/25/3285.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1479776" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/performance/default.aspx">performance</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/cache/default.aspx">cache</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/users/default.aspx">users</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/tsql/default.aspx">tsql</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/best+practice/default.aspx">best practice</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/backups/default.aspx">backups</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/create/default.aspx">create</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/online/default.aspx">online</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/monitoring/default.aspx">monitoring</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/operating+system/default.aspx">operating system</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/busy/default.aspx">busy</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/creation/default.aspx">creation</category></item><item><title>SQL Server indexing - when to reorganize or rebuild?</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/01/21/3208.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1473348</guid><dc:creator>SSQA.net</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1473348</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1473348</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/01/21/3208.aspx#comments</comments><description>Re-organizing or rebuilding index would help the SQL optimizer to reduce the fragmentation for a better performance. In this case few users might have doubt that when to rebuild or reorganize (SQL Server 2005)? IN the series of Performance blog posts...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/01/21/3208.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1473348" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/msdn/default.aspx">msdn</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/blogs/default.aspx">blogs</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/rebuild/default.aspx">rebuild</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/schema/default.aspx">schema</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/best+practice/default.aspx">best practice</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/schedule/default.aspx">schedule</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/links/default.aspx">links</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/performance+monitoring/default.aspx">performance monitoring</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/reorganize/default.aspx">reorganize</category></item><item><title>SQL Server Query Performance - think about page split and fragmentation, measures to reduce the behaviour and best use of dm_db_index_physical_stats DMV</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/01/14/3183.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:22:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1462655</guid><dc:creator>SSQA.net</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1462655</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1462655</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/01/14/3183.aspx#comments</comments><description>It is an universal truth in the database field that due to the fragmentation and page split the performance will be affected even for a simple [ SELECT &amp;lt;ColumnName&amp;gt; from.... ] type of query. So what you need to check or take action in terms of DBA...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/01/14/3183.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1462655" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/performance/default.aspx">performance</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/maintenance+plan/default.aspx">maintenance plan</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/dmv/default.aspx">dmv</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/dba/default.aspx">dba</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/best+practice/default.aspx">best practice</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/performance+monitoring/default.aspx">performance monitoring</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sys.dm_5F00_db_5F00_index_5F00_physical_5F00_stats/default.aspx">sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/measures/default.aspx">measures</category></item><item><title>Vote now: Index defragmentation best practices for SQL Server 2005 documentation - feedback received from Microsoft</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2008/01/04/vote-now-index-defragmentation-best-practices-for-sql-server-2005.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1437704</guid><dc:creator>SSQA.net</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1437704</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1437704</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2008/01/04/vote-now-index-defragmentation-best-practices-for-sql-server-2005.aspx#comments</comments><description>May 25 2007- From the snippet of Tibor Karaszi , SQL Server MVP I have raised a feedback form on Connect.Microsoft website to get newer version (SQL Server 2005) about Index Defragmentation Best practices information. Vote your interest to get newer documentation...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2008/01/04/vote-now-index-defragmentation-best-practices-for-sql-server-2005.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1437704" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/defragmentation/default.aspx">defragmentation</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/microsoft/default.aspx">microsoft</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/i_2F00_o/default.aspx">i/o</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/best+practices/default.aspx">best practices</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/feedback/default.aspx">feedback</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+express/default.aspx">sql express</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/connect/default.aspx">connect</category></item><item><title>SQL Server SP_HELPINDEX - updated version that includes column names</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/01/03/3102.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1435661</guid><dc:creator>SSQA.net</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1435661</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1435661</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/01/03/3102.aspx#comments</comments><description>Here is the incentive for the SQL Server users (this new year), you may be aware then using SP_HELPINDEX or SP_HELP could give some part of information on the indexes and database objects. But to know more about depedant columns you need to query INFORMATION_SCHEMA...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2008/01/03/3102.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1435661" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/databases/default.aspx">databases</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+queen/default.aspx">sql queen</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/script/default.aspx">script</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/columns/default.aspx">columns</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/kalen+delaney/default.aspx">kalen delaney</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sp_5F00_help/default.aspx">sp_help</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/included/default.aspx">included</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sp_5F00_helpindex/default.aspx">sp_helpindex</category></item><item><title>SQL Server ETL Performance during Data Load Optimization</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2007/12/20/2992.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1407654</guid><dc:creator>SSQA.net</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1407654</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1407654</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2007/12/20/2992.aspx#comments</comments><description>Do you have a large ETL process to finish on day-to-day basis? Is your ETL process is suffering with performance loss during the BULK insert or export task? Are you using SQL Server 2005? If it is YES for all the above then you can take advantage of SQL...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/perftune/archive/2007/12/20/2992.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1407654" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/performance/default.aspx">performance</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/backup/default.aspx">backup</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/etl/default.aspx">etl</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/disable/default.aspx">disable</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/bulk+insert/default.aspx">bulk insert</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/slow+query/default.aspx">slow query</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/alter+index/default.aspx">alter index</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/load/default.aspx">load</category></item><item><title>TSQL to findout blocking and locks on a SQL Server?</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/t-sql/archive/2007/12/07/2877.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1385102</guid><dc:creator>SSQA.net</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1385102</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1385102</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/t-sql/archive/2007/12/07/2877.aspx#comments</comments><description>Have you ever performed huge operations such as deleting records of a table and processing inserts on that table at the same time? This is a common task that every application will have to perform and you can avoid by fine tuning your queries (mostly...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/t-sql/archive/2007/12/07/2877.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1385102" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/performance/default.aspx">performance</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/blocking/default.aspx">blocking</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/security/default.aspx">security</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/insert/default.aspx">insert</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/tsql/default.aspx">tsql</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/locks/default.aspx">locks</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/deletes/default.aspx">deletes</category></item><item><title>Internal Tables in SQL Server 2005, what are they for?</title><link>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2007/11/02/internal-tables-in-sql-server-2005-what-are-they-for.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 08:17:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1278009</guid><dc:creator>SSQA.net</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1278009</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1278009</wfw:comment><comments>http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2007/11/02/internal-tables-in-sql-server-2005-what-are-they-for.aspx#comments</comments><description>By default SQL Server automatically creates the internal tables for Full-text search, XML indexes and Service broker. These are also created when a user query is written poorly that uses tempdb heavily. At they are called internal tables but do not contain...(&lt;a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2007/11/02/internal-tables-in-sql-server-2005-what-are-they-for.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1278009" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/sql+server/default.aspx">sql server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/indexes/default.aspx">indexes</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/security/default.aspx">security</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/search/default.aspx">search</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/xml/default.aspx">xml</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/permissions/default.aspx">permissions</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/table/default.aspx">table</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/full-text/default.aspx">full-text</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/ssqa/archive/tags/internal+tables/default.aspx">internal tables</category></item></channel></rss>