FTC versus Innovative Marketing et al - developments
A win for Marc D'Souza.
The preliminary injunction is to be modified as followed (the FTC indicated that it had no objections to the language of the amendments):
"F. The Assets affected by this Paragraph shall include existing Assets of any Corporate Defendant, Individual Defendant (with the exception of Assets referenced in paragraph G), or Relief Defendant and Assets acquired after the effective date of this Order that are derived from conduct prohibited in Paragraphs I and II.
G. With respect to Defendant Marc D’Souza, the Assets affected by this Paragraph do not include Assets acquired after December 31, 2006 that were generated independently of the IMI Defendants (other than Marc D’Souza) and are not derived from any conduct prohibited in Paragraphs I and II."
Kristy Ross may move for a similar amendment.