FTC versus Innovative Marketing… developments
Today was a big day…
“Motion Hearing held on Tuesday 9 June, 2009 re:
- (51) MOTION to Strike (49) MOTION for Other Relief Order Holding Sam Jain and Kristy Ross In Contempt Of Court And Requiring The Repatriation Of Their Assets OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION to Strike (49) MOTION for Other Relief Order Holding Sam Jain and Kristy Ross In Contempt Of Court And Requiring The Repatriation Of Their Assets OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Kristy Ross,
- (45) MOTION to Stay filed by Sam Jain,
- (106) MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Marc D'Souza,
- (90) MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Maurice D'Souza,
- (60) MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Sam Jain,
- (52) MOTION to Strike (49) MOTION for Other Relief Order Holding Sam Jain and Kristy Ross In Contempt Of Court And Requiring The Repatriation Of Their Assets or, in the Alternative, for Extension of Time to Respond MOTION to Strike (49) MOTION for Other Relief Order Holding Sam Jain and Kristy Ross In Contempt Of Court And Requiring The Repatriation Of Their Assets or, in the Alternative, for Extension of Time to Respond filed by Sam Jain,
- (61) MOTION to Dismiss COMPLAINT filed by Kristy Ross,
- (48) MOTION to Stay (Temporary) filed by Kristy Ross,
- (71) MOTION to Stay Temporary filed by Marc D'Souza,
- (70) MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Marc D'Souza
The hearing was held before Judge Richard D Bennett and not concluded.
By the way, Innovative Marketing is still unrepresented and, as far as I know, have not paid a cent of the $8,000 per day fine levied by the Court (I may be wrong, I hope I’m wrong, but suspect that I am not).