Developments in the FTC versus Innovative Marketing et al lawsuit

Joint MOTION to Stay Further Proceedings as to James M. Reno and Bytehosting Internet Services, LLC Pending Approval of Settlement by Federal Trade Commission.  Responses due by 4/3/2009 (Robbins, Colleen)

The FTC, James Reno and Bytehosting Internet Services have requested the Court stay further proceedings as to James Reno and Bytehosting for a period of 90 days.

The stay is requested so that the Commission's attorneys can seek approval of a "Stipulated Final Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgment As To Defendants James M. Reno and Bytehosting Internet Services, LLC".  Reno and Bytehosting executed a proposed stipulated final order on 11 March 2009, but this proposed stipulated final order must firstly be approved by the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection and then considered, voted on and approved by the full Commission; a procedure that can take up to 90 days.

We will not know the details of the proposed stipulated final order until it it is approved, and then lodged with the Court for its approval.

Published Wed, Mar 18 2009 22:54 by sandi
Filed under: ,

Comments

# re: Developments in the FTC versus Innovative Marketing et al lawsuit

Saturday, May 16, 2009 5:53 PM by j davis

Hopefully the court will not cut Reno any slack. They should make an example of all the defendants involved in this with long prison sentences and confiscation of all assets. I'm sure there are many large inmates that would be more than happy to introduce Reno, D'Souza and Jain to the nuances of prison life. I hope the FTC follows through on this and sends these vermin to prison for decates not just a couple of years.