<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Risque Management - All Comments</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/default.aspx</link><description>Information Security for Information Society</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP1 (Build: 30619.63)</generator><item><title>re: Degradation: a new generation of computer worms</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/05/27/degradation-new-generation-of-computer-viruses.aspx#1461764</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:25:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1461764</guid><dc:creator>FlitteBrealry</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi people!!! I want introduce my &amp;lt;a href=&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.xrum.977mb.com&amp;gt;new"&gt;http://www.xrum.977mb.com&amp;gt;new&lt;/a&gt; year foto&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1461764" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Degradation: a new generation of computer worms</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/05/27/degradation-new-generation-of-computer-viruses.aspx#1459116</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:24:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1459116</guid><dc:creator>FlitteBrealry</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi people!!! I want introduce my &amp;lt;a href=&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.xrum.977mb.com&amp;gt;new"&gt;http://www.xrum.977mb.com&amp;gt;new&lt;/a&gt; year foto.&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1459116" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Security Product Watch  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; What is more secure?</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/11/09/what-is-more-secure.aspx#1292224</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 07:26:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1292224</guid><dc:creator>Security Product Watch  » Blog Archive   » What is more secure?</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;Security Product Watch &amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;raquo; Blog Archive &amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;raquo; What is more secure?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1292224" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Integrating Java, JDBC and Kerberos</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/06/05/integrating-java-jdbc-and-kerberos.aspx#1276659</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:54:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1276659</guid><dc:creator>grrd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;host/XXXXX@FORMUE.LOCAL is a user account in Active Directory, but it represents the machine on which the application runs (as described in &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs81/secmanage/sso.html"&gt;edocs.bea.com/.../sso.html&lt;/a&gt;). The user in 'Invalid Subject: xxxxx' is a normal user with a valid account. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1276659" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Integrating Java, JDBC and Kerberos</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/06/05/integrating-java-jdbc-and-kerberos.aspx#1276507</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 07:17:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1276507</guid><dc:creator>Slav</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Principal is host/XXXXX@FORMUE.LOCAL, eh? I reckon using a user account is a better option.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1276507" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Integrating Java, JDBC and Kerberos</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/06/05/integrating-java-jdbc-and-kerberos.aspx#1275337</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:09:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1275337</guid><dc:creator>grrd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello and thanks for your helpful blog post. This is the only useful piece of information I have been able to find on this subject. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am running WebLogic 8.1.6 on Win2003 server, and using the Datadirect Driver for my connection pool. I have set up Kerberos authentication as described and am trying to get a connection (and execute a stored procedure) as a logged in user, but when I do Datasource#getConnection (in Security.runAs(subject, new PrivilegedExceptionAction() {....) I get the following error:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Debug is &amp;nbsp;true storeKey false useTicketCache true useKeyTab false doNotPrompt true ticketCache is null KeyTab is null refreshKrb5Config is false princ&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ipal is null tryFirstPass is false useFirstPass is false storePass is false clearPass is false&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Principal is host/XXXXX@FORMUE.LOCAL&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit Succeeded&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;applicationlogger 2007-10-31 12:01:54,202 ERROR java.sql.SQLException: Pool connect failed : java.lang.SecurityException: [Security:090398]Invalid Sub&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ject: xxxxx&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;Oct 31, 2007 12:01:54 PM CET&amp;gt; &amp;lt;Error&amp;gt; &amp;lt;HTTP&amp;gt; &amp;lt;BEA-101020&amp;gt; &amp;lt;[ServletContext(id=28475974,name=web,context-path=)] Servlet failed with Exception&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;java.lang.RuntimeException: java.sql.SQLException: Pool connect failed : java.lang.SecurityException: [Security:090398]Invalid Subject: xxxxx&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;at no.formue.util.database.DBMgr$1.run(DBMgr.java:308)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:147)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;at weblogic.security.Security.runAs(Security.java:61)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;at no.formue.util.database.DBMgr.getConnection(DBMgr.java:294)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;at no.formue.util.database.DBMgr.getDefaultConnection(DBMgr.java:262)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;at no.formue.login.servlet.ADLoginServlet.doGet(ADLoginServlet.java:45)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:740)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The subject is authenticated and valid at this point as far as I can tell. Any ideas what might cause this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1275337" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Notes from RIM BlackBerry presentation</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/03/01/notes-from-rim-blackberry-presentation.aspx#1242730</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 01:30:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1242730</guid><dc:creator>muugi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;want to see content&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1242730" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: VoIP Scaremongers</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/08/05/voip-scaremongers.aspx#1091278</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:34:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1091278</guid><dc:creator>Joshua Thomas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;who knows they might have lots more up their sleeves ... &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AFAIK I know OCS has been cracked open too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1091278" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Virtually hopeless</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/03/30/q-detecting-virtualisation.aspx#1072201</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:50:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1072201</guid><dc:creator>Risque Management</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;amp;#39;t know if that&amp;amp;#39;s CIOs, or the press, or both. Recently Byte &amp;amp;amp; Switch, CMP Technology&amp;amp;#39;s&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1072201" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Virtual infrastructure v Terminal servers</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/07/14/virtual-infrastructure-v-terminal-servers.aspx#1046465</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:35:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1046465</guid><dc:creator>Slav</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Appareltly VMWare/EMC don't recommend iSCSI for enterprises. The recommendation is Fibre Channel but there are few things that aren't trivial if you want dynamic DR capability in multidatacentre environment. Namely - eliminating SAN as single point of failure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1046465" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Governments are hopeless at security</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/03/01/notes-from-rim-blackberry-presentation.aspx#1000281</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 09:36:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1000281</guid><dc:creator>Risque Management</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the good things about BlackBerry - apart from the main client platform that will never get really&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1000281" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Use glue instead</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/06/25/use-glue-instead.aspx#991841</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 23:59:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:991841</guid><dc:creator>Nhon Yeung</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Another way without extra software is to do it in the BIOS. Most corporate pc's (ie dell/HP) also have hardware interlocks which can be configured to alert if the pc is opened as well. So you can be notified if someone tries to reset the BIOS or remove the HDD. I guess the only thing you need to glue to the pc is the mouse considering ps/2 or serial ports are pretty much extinct these days.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But i agree, siphoning info is a null point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=991841" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>The attack surface</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/02/25/good-principles-for-solution-architects.aspx#962166</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:962166</guid><dc:creator>Risque Management</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Jabez Gan, a fellow MVP, did an interesting book review - that of Professional Windows Desktop and Server&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=962166" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Single authority principle</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/05/15/single-authority-principle.aspx#949745</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:58:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:949745</guid><dc:creator>Slav</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I should have used &amp;quot;circular cause&amp;quot; or something like that. Not that illustrous...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=949745" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Single authority principle</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/05/15/single-authority-principle.aspx#949707</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 06:49:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:949707</guid><dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator><description>you can&amp;#39;t have a chicken-egg problem.   An almost chicken can produce a chicken egg, but a chicken can&amp;#39;t evolve from the part-chicken egg to become a chicken, hence the egg must come first.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=949707" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The weakest link</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/03/15/the-weakest-link.aspx#892300</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 10:59:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:892300</guid><dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, Paul Ashton posted something into mailinglists in around 1998. I have been spoking about the concept since 1999 in different conferences. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But generally available Linux/SAMBA tools are newer than the POCs I meant.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Original public concept for Windows tools was released by Hernan Ochoa, in year 2000. The tool he did was a Windows tool. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Earlier to this, Dominique Brezinski and Eric Schultze did local SAM database writing directly, Foundstone spent some time to demo this Core's Windows tool in 2000-2001 mainly in USA conferences. I also heard concept was demoed with a Windows tool, in a conference held in Finland around December 2003, and a year after as well. So nothing new in that sense either - seems that what goes around, goes around.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Passing the hash works because that is how protocol was designed. Vectors how to do it...that is another story. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Take care,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rob&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=892300" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to prevent 1% of cybercrime?</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/02/15/more-secure-ssl.aspx#891967</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 03:56:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:891967</guid><dc:creator>Risque Management</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;An interesting picture appears on the PBS Shop Web site: Because of what it says I felt an urge to click&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=891967" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to prevent 1% of cybercrime?</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/04/19/false-sense-of-security.aspx#891818</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 01:20:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:891818</guid><dc:creator>Risque Management</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;An interesting picture appears on the PBS Shop Web site: Because of what it says I felt an urge to click&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=891818" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Measuring efficiency of systems management</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/02/19/endpoint-security-not-there-yet.aspx#888851</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 10:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:888851</guid><dc:creator>Risque Management</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Have you ever wondered how efficient your systems management is? Here&amp;amp;#39;s some questions that will&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=888851" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The weakest link</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp/archive/2007/03/15/the-weakest-link.aspx#888636</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 06:24:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:888636</guid><dc:creator>Slav</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I have found few mentions of Linux/SAMBA tools searching for &amp;quot;pass the hash&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wonder why Microsoft decided to do nothing. Perhaps they see the need to become local system equivalent the root issue - but the ways to collect NTLM hashes aren't limited to that. Some additional threat modeling needs to be done.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=888636" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>