<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Windows Networking &amp;amp; Remote Access - All Comments</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/robwill/default.aspx</link><description>by: Rob Williams [MVP]</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP1 (Build: 30619.63)</generator><item><title>re: VPN client name resolution</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/robwill/archive/2008/05/10/vpn-client-name-resolution.aspx#1627231</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 17:23:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1627231</guid><dc:creator>Rob Williams</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Correct. Both client and host sites must use different subnets. If they are the same, none of the above solutions will help, as that is a routing issue, not a name resolution issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1627231" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: VPN client name resolution</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/robwill/archive/2008/05/10/vpn-client-name-resolution.aspx#1627209</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 15:32:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1627209</guid><dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;V informative notes, thsnks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the brute force method, using plain IP, does this assume then that there are no conflicts, ie same IP on the local and remote networks? ( for clarification, that would not be a problem it they use different subnets - 192.168.2.x and 192.168.5.x - but would be if both are on 2 say ) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1627209" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: LMHosts and Hosts files</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/robwill/archive/2008/05/10/lmhosts-and-hosts-files.aspx#1620954</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:01:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1620954</guid><dc:creator>Rob Williams</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;My apologies, correct, only Hosts file and DNS names can be used with IPV6. I will edit the post. Thanks aluni&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1620954" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: LMHosts and Hosts files</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/robwill/archive/2008/05/10/lmhosts-and-hosts-files.aspx#1620906</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:12:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1620906</guid><dc:creator>Alun Jones</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Can the LMHosts file really be used for IPv6? Remember that there is _no_ NetBIOS over IPv6.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1620906" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: VPN client name resolution</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/robwill/archive/2008/05/10/vpn-client-name-resolution.aspx#1620905</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:11:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1620905</guid><dc:creator>Alun Jones</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;... and when you go to IPv6, you&amp;#39;ll have no WINS, but you will have LLMNR - Link-Local Multicast Name Resolution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1620905" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>