Browse by Tags

All Tags » Testing » Typemock (RSS)
Fix for problem faking two SPLists in a single unit test with Typemock Isolator has been released
Mon, Apr 2 2012 10:00
A blogged a while ago about a problem faking multiple SPList with Typemock Isolator in a single test . With the release of Typemock Isolator 7.0.4.0 you no longer have to use the workaround I documented. You can now use the code if the originally planned, and it works as expected 1: public partial class TestPage : System.Web.UI.Page 2: { 3: public TestPage()... Read More...
by But it works on my PC!
Filed under: , ,
More thoughts on Typemock Isolator, Microsoft Fakes and Sharepoint
Sat, Mar 24 2012 5:01
I posted yesterday on using Typemock and Microsoft Fakes with SharePoint . After a bit more thought I realised the key thing in using Typemock I found easier was the construction of my SPListItem dataset. Typemock allowed me to fake SPListItems and put them in a generic List<SPListItem> then just make this the return value for the Item collection using... Read More...
by But it works on my PC!
Filed under: , , ,
Now that VS11 has a fake library do I still need Typemock Isolator to fake out SharePoint?
Fri, Mar 23 2012 12:16
I have done posts in the past about how you can use Typemock Isolator to fake out SharePoint to speed design and testing . The  reason you need special tooling, beyond standard mocking frameworks like Rhino or MOQ, is that SharePoint has many sealed private classes with no public constructors. So in the past you only had two options: Typemock Isolator and... Read More...
by But it works on my PC!
Filed under: , , ,
Free webinar on Typemock Isolator V7
Mon, Feb 20 2012 7:54
Next Wednesday (the 22nd of February) Typemock are running a free webinar ‘Isolator V7 Preview: A New Perspective on Unit Testing’ . It will be showcasing Immediate feedback of newly introduced bugs with a new autorunner. Pinpoint identification of the bug's location with the failed-test analyzer. Visual coverage of which part of your code is covered Powerful... Read More...
by But it works on my PC!
Filed under: ,