Pontificating Virtual Parameterized Constructors in C#http://msmvps.com/blogs/peterritchie/archive/2008/11/18/pontificating-virtual-parameterized-constructors-in-c.aspxTom Hollander recently posted about a change he required to the Enterprise Library for date/time validation. He had to create a new class (rather than modify the Enterprise Library) that derived from another, defective class. One of his complaints wasenCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)Dew Drop - November 19, 2008 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dewhttp://msmvps.com/blogs/peterritchie/archive/2008/11/18/pontificating-virtual-parameterized-constructors-in-c.aspx#1654553Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:33:11 GMTd67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1654553Dew Drop - November 19, 2008 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew<p>Pingback from &nbsp;Dew Drop - November 19, 2008 | Alvin Ashcraft&#39;s Morning Dew</p> <img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1654553" width="1" height="1">Pontificating Virtual Parameterized Constructors in C#http://msmvps.com/blogs/peterritchie/archive/2008/11/18/pontificating-virtual-parameterized-constructors-in-c.aspx#1654470Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:05:24 GMTd67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1654470DotNetKicks.com<p>You&#39;ve been kicked (a good thing) - Trackback from DotNetKicks.com</p> <img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1654470" width="1" height="1">