<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>VSTO/ CAS Deployment Hell - How Good Intentions Go Bad</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/nickwienholt/archive/2006/10/13/VSTO_2F00_-CAS-Deployment-Hell-_2D00_-How-Good-Intentions-Go-Bad.aspx</link><description>The Scenario I'm supporting a VSTO application that does a pretty typical Office style thing. CAS policy updates to let the particular .NET assembly run are added to the end-users machine at install time, and the application works fine when the document</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>VSTO Deployment Problems - One Piece of the Problem Solved</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/nickwienholt/archive/2006/10/13/VSTO_2F00_-CAS-Deployment-Hell-_2D00_-How-Good-Intentions-Go-Bad.aspx#244828</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 05:45:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:244828</guid><dc:creator>.NET Performance</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A couple of weeks ago I wrote about the frustrution of VSTO deployment , and the real hole that VSTO&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=244828" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>