<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Art of NAV –Dynamics NAV 2009 network Stats</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/kine/archive/2008/10/09/the-art-of-nav-dynamics-nav-2009-network-stats.aspx</link><description>Today I prepared some stats about network traffic in NAV 2009 RTC client. You can compare the results with C/Side client (classic client). Measuring: for measuring I have used the Microsoft Network Monitor for catching the NAV communication between client</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: The Art of NAV –Dynamics NAV 2009 network Stats</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/kine/archive/2008/10/09/the-art-of-nav-dynamics-nav-2009-network-stats.aspx#1650505</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:26:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1650505</guid><dc:creator>PDJ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;These results are very interesting. Thanks a lot for your great work! :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m quite surprised about the problem with reports, but great to get the info. This also clarifies that the new client is not an alternative to a Citrix solution for low bandwidth locations. I guess a Citrix client will only transfer 1-5% of the other two clients.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1650505" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>