<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>New Feature in 2008 R2 - Cluster Shared Volumes</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/11/04/new-feature-in-2008-r2-cluster-shared-volumes.aspx</link><description>This week, Microsoft is announcing that Windows 2008 R2 will add a new feature to Failover Clusters called &amp;ldquo;Cluster Shared Volumes (CSV)&amp;rdquo;. This feature is being introduced so that they can support the Live Migration feature for Hyper-V. You</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: New Feature in 2008 R2 - Cluster Shared Volumes</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/11/04/new-feature-in-2008-r2-cluster-shared-volumes.aspx#1737154</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:53:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1737154</guid><dc:creator>Jiri Formacek</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, it is not supported in multi-site, and the behavior of CSV is weird in this scenario: on non-owning node, any process that tries to access CSV, just hangs and it does not start responding until you move CSV ownership to this node.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reason for this is that DCM computes the topology between nodes according the static information in cluster configuration: it searches for cluster network that has both owning and non-owning node&amp;#39;s NIC connected. In case it does not find such network, it mounts the CSV in something like &amp;#39;Paused&amp;#39; state, so any calls through CSV driver to CSV will end in CSV driver waitng for volume to be ready....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my opinion, this is not what product team exactly wanted - seems to me that CSV design was done not considering multi-subnet scenarios at all...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1737154" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: New Feature in 2008 R2 - Cluster Shared Volumes</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/11/04/new-feature-in-2008-r2-cluster-shared-volumes.aspx#1665618</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:21:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1665618</guid><dc:creator>Brian Henderson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;maybe this would help:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2009/01/14/free-sanbolic-licenses-for-windows-server-2008-r2-beta-users/"&gt;blog.scottlowe.org/.../free-sanbolic-licenses-for-windows-server-2008-r2-beta-users&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1665618" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>