<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Geographically Dispersed Clustering</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/default.aspx</link><description>John Toner&amp;#39;s blog about geographically dispersed clustering in a Windows environment</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>RecoverPoint Cluster Enabler</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2009/05/29/recoverpoint-cluster-enabler.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1693399</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1693399</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1693399</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2009/05/29/recoverpoint-cluster-enabler.aspx#comments</comments><description>One of these days, I do plan on writing about other non-EMC geographically dispersed solutions&amp;hellip;I swear . I just need to find the time to give these other products a proper test run before writing my opinions about them so I can give them a fair...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2009/05/29/recoverpoint-cluster-enabler.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1693399" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/RP_2F00_CE/default.aspx">RP/CE</category></item><item><title>Adding a disk to a Windows 2008 Failover Cluster using cluster.exe commands</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2009/01/08/adding-a-disk-to-a-windows-2008-failover-cluster-using-cluster-exe-commands.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1659339</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1659339</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1659339</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2009/01/08/adding-a-disk-to-a-windows-2008-failover-cluster-using-cluster-exe-commands.aspx#comments</comments><description>This isn&amp;#39;t specific to multi-site clustering, but I&amp;#39;ve certainly had to use this many times when adding devices to my multi-site clusters. Adding disks to a multi-site Windows 2008 cluster is not as easy as it should be. In Windows 2008, Microsoft...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2009/01/08/adding-a-disk-to-a-windows-2008-failover-cluster-using-cluster-exe-commands.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1659339" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>New Feature in 2008 R2 - Cluster Shared Volumes</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/11/04/new-feature-in-2008-r2-cluster-shared-volumes.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1653077</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1653077</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1653077</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/11/04/new-feature-in-2008-r2-cluster-shared-volumes.aspx#comments</comments><description>This week, Microsoft is announcing that Windows 2008 R2 will add a new feature to Failover Clusters called &amp;ldquo;Cluster Shared Volumes (CSV)&amp;rdquo;. This feature is being introduced so that they can support the Live Migration feature for Hyper-V. You...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/11/04/new-feature-in-2008-r2-cluster-shared-volumes.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1653077" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/CSV/default.aspx">CSV</category></item><item><title>EMC Cluster Enabler Updates</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/11/03/emc-cluster-enabler-updates.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1652970</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1652970</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1652970</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/11/03/emc-cluster-enabler-updates.aspx#comments</comments><description>It&amp;rsquo;s been a really busy month for us. This past month, EMC has released a new version of SRDF/CE, MV/CE and internally announced a new addition to the Cluster Enabler family. I don&amp;rsquo;t think it&amp;rsquo;s been publicly announced, so I&amp;rsquo;ll...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/11/03/emc-cluster-enabler-updates.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1652970" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/SRDF_2F00_CE/default.aspx">SRDF/CE</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/MV_2F00_CE/default.aspx">MV/CE</category></item><item><title>SQL Strikes Again</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/09/08/sql-strikes-again.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:05:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1647156</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1647156</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1647156</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/09/08/sql-strikes-again.aspx#comments</comments><description>I learned today that SQL 2008 will actually not install by default in many multi-site cluster solutions. Why? Well, during the SQL 2008 installation, it runs through a Configuration Checker where one of the tests the environment to ensure that the cluster...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/09/08/sql-strikes-again.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1647156" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/SQL/default.aspx">SQL</category></item><item><title>Multiple Subnets with Windows 2008 Clusters</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/08/08/multiple-subnets-with-windows-2008-clusters.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1643951</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1643951</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1643951</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/08/08/multiple-subnets-with-windows-2008-clusters.aspx#comments</comments><description>I&amp;rsquo;ve been playing around with Microsoft Windows 2008 clusters for a while now trying to test out some of the new features and how they will affect multi-site clusters. One of the best new features (in my opinion) in 2008 clusters is the ability...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/08/08/multiple-subnets-with-windows-2008-clusters.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1643951" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/2008/default.aspx">2008</category></item><item><title>SQL 2008 Team - Please Add multi-subnet support!</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/06/27/sql-2008-team-please-add-multi-subnet-support.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1638454</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1638454</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1638454</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/06/27/sql-2008-team-please-add-multi-subnet-support.aspx#comments</comments><description>I was informed that feedback for Microsoft product groups should be done through the http://connect.microsoft.com page. So I&amp;#39;ve submitted a request to add support for clusters running multiple subnets here: https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/06/27/sql-2008-team-please-add-multi-subnet-support.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1638454" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/SQL/default.aspx">SQL</category></item><item><title>SQL 2008</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/06/16/sql-2008.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1635703</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1635703</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1635703</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/06/16/sql-2008.aspx#comments</comments><description>One of the great new features of Windows 2008 Failover Clustering is the removal of the &amp;quot;same subnet&amp;quot; restriction. This is a huge feature for multi-site clusters as I personally know of several customers that did not implement a multi-site cluster...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/06/16/sql-2008.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1635703" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/SQL/default.aspx">SQL</category></item><item><title>EMC MirrorView Cluster Enabler Released!</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/05/19/emc-mirrorview-cluster-enabler-released.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 20:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1624540</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1624540</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1624540</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/05/19/emc-mirrorview-cluster-enabler-released.aspx#comments</comments><description>If you’ve read through some of my previous posts , you might have picked up on the fact that this product was coming soon. EMC has finally released an SRDF/CE equivalent for the Clariion arrays utilizing MirrorView. Sure, we’ve got other products for...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/05/19/emc-mirrorview-cluster-enabler-released.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1624540" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/MV_2F00_CE/default.aspx">MV/CE</category></item><item><title>Cluster Enabler 3.0 Released</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/04/21/cluster-enabler-3-0-released.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1598475</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1598475</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1598475</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/04/21/cluster-enabler-3-0-released.aspx#comments</comments><description>EMC recently released the latest version of SRDF/CE for MSCS. This new release has the following changes: New Name - The overall product line has been renamed to &amp;quot;Cluster Enabler&amp;quot; and the first product released in this line is SRDF/CE for MSCS...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/04/21/cluster-enabler-3-0-released.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1598475" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/SRDF_2F00_CE/default.aspx">SRDF/CE</category></item><item><title>Clustering Webcasts on Demand</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/02/21/clustering-webcasts-on-demand.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1521055</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1521055</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1521055</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/02/21/clustering-webcasts-on-demand.aspx#comments</comments><description>Microsoft gave some great webcasts related to 2008 clustering last month. If you missed any of these sessions, you can view these recording on-demand and/or snag the PPT files here: Building High Availability Infrastructures with Windows Server 2008 Failover...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/02/21/clustering-webcasts-on-demand.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1521055" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/2008/default.aspx">2008</category></item><item><title>Future Releases of SRDF/CE</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/01/12/future-releases-of-srdf-ce.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1459087</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1459087</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1459087</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/01/12/future-releases-of-srdf-ce.aspx#comments</comments><description>It&amp;#39;s been far too long since I&amp;#39;ve written a blog post, mostly due to the holiday rush. There&amp;#39;s much going on in my world of geo-clustering with 2008 RC1 being released, and also there&amp;#39;s been some development activity for SRDF/CE. I’ve...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2008/01/12/future-releases-of-srdf-ce.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1459087" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/SRDF_2F00_CE/default.aspx">SRDF/CE</category></item><item><title>What applications are supported by SRDF/CE?</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/11/17/what-applications-are-supported-by-srdf-ce.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1324847</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1324847</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1324847</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/11/17/what-applications-are-supported-by-srdf-ce.aspx#comments</comments><description>I often get asked if SRDF/CE supports various versions of Exchange or SQL, especially just after a new version is released. If you are one those that have asked, you have likely received my sarcastic, yet completely accurate answer that SRDF/CE does NOT...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/11/17/what-applications-are-supported-by-srdf-ce.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1324847" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/SRDF_2F00_CE/default.aspx">SRDF/CE</category></item><item><title>Quorum Arbitration in a Geographically Dispersed Cluster</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/10/07/quorum-arbitration-in-a-geographically-dispersed-cluster.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 17:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1237812</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1237812</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1237812</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/10/07/quorum-arbitration-in-a-geographically-dispersed-cluster.aspx#comments</comments><description>Thanks to Oliver Simpson for his comments and his question…how does quorum arbitration work in a geographically dispersed cluster and how is this different between SRDF/CE and MirrorView. This is a great question and I hope I don’t bore you with too many...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/10/07/quorum-arbitration-in-a-geographically-dispersed-cluster.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1237812" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/SRDF_2F00_CE/default.aspx">SRDF/CE</category></item><item><title>SRDF/CE Training</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/09/05/srdf-ce-training.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1167532</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1167532</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1167532</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/09/05/srdf-ce-training.aspx#comments</comments><description>In a past life, I used to travel the globe delivering training classes to EMC personnel and a few select customers. This training was not widely known about and was only given to customers that begged for more knowledge about the product. I am happy to...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/09/05/srdf-ce-training.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1167532" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/SRDF_2F00_CE/default.aspx">SRDF/CE</category></item><item><title>MirrorView/CE</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/07/06/mirrorview-ce.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 17:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1005918</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1005918</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=1005918</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/07/06/mirrorview-ce.aspx#comments</comments><description>Continuing my topic about geoclustering on a Clariion, we&amp;#39;ve recently discovered that my previous scenario that I tested can actually be FULLY SUPPORTED by Microsoft and EMC! Thanks to Edwin for pointing out the following entry in the Windows Catalog...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/07/06/mirrorview-ce.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1005918" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/MV_2F00_CE/default.aspx">MV/CE</category></item><item><title>Majority Node Set Clustering</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/06/07/majority-node-set-clustering.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:948592</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=948592</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=948592</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/06/07/majority-node-set-clustering.aspx#comments</comments><description>When I was first introduced MNS, I hated this little feature of Windows 2003. In my opinion, MNS has created some confusion in the marketplace as it has been positioned (incorrectly) by some as “the” solution for geographically dispersed clustering. I...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/06/07/majority-node-set-clustering.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=948592" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/MNS/default.aspx">MNS</category></item><item><title>Geographically Dispersed Clustering with Clariion</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/05/14/geographically-dispersed-clustering-with-clariion.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:904135</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=904135</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=904135</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/05/14/geographically-dispersed-clustering-with-clariion.aspx#comments</comments><description>Thanks to Ira Pfeifer for jump starting this topic…I would’ve hit this subject eventually as this has been a rather frustrating experience that I’ve gone through over the years. One of the things that I’ve been pushing for many, many years at EMC is to...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/05/14/geographically-dispersed-clustering-with-clariion.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=904135" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/Clariion/default.aspx">Clariion</category></item><item><title>EMC SRDF/CE for MSCS</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/04/27/emc-srdf-ce-for-mscs.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:880965</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=880965</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=880965</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/04/27/emc-srdf-ce-for-mscs.aspx#comments</comments><description>Let me first discuss my pet project, SRDF/CE for MSCS. What is SRDF/CE you ask? Well it is EMC’s geographically dispersed clustering software. SRDF/CE is an EMC proprietary product that is used to integrate EMC’s SRDF technology with MSCS. Basically,...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/04/27/emc-srdf-ce-for-mscs.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=880965" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/tags/SRDF_2F00_CE/default.aspx">SRDF/CE</category></item><item><title>Welcome to my blog!</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/04/16/welcome-to-my-blog.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:816985</guid><dc:creator>John Toner</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=816985</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/commentapi.aspx?PostID=816985</wfw:comment><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/04/16/welcome-to-my-blog.aspx#comments</comments><description>I’ve finally decided that it’s time to start a blog. Why? Well, it wasn’t only a bandwagon thing…I thought that this might help to keep me motivated to do some of the things that I’ve been intending on doing for many, many moons. I hope that if I put...(&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner/archive/2007/04/16/welcome-to-my-blog.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=816985" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>