Recent Posts

Tags

News

  • Search

    <input class="BlogSearch" type="text" name="searchBox" id="blogSearchText" value="" onkeypress="return blogSearch(event, this);"> <input type="button" value="Search" onclick="return blogSearch2('blogSearchText');" class="BlogSearchButton"> <script type="text/javascript"> function blogSearch(event, oInput) { var keyCode = (event) ? event.keyCode : keyStroke.which; if (keyCode == 13) { top.location = 'http://www.google.com/search?q=' + escape(oInput.value) + '+inurl%3Ajavier+site%3Amsmvps.com'; return false; } return true; } function blogSearch2(oInputId) { var oInput = document.getElementById(oInputId); top.location = 'http://www.google.com/search?q=' + escape(oInput.value) + '+inurl%3Ajavier+site%3Amsmvps.com'; return false; } </script>

Community

Email Notifications

SBS Blogs

Helpful Sites

Archives

Javier's SBS Wonderland

Take the red pill and see how far down the rabbit hole goes...

Per Processor Licensing

Although this is old news for SBSers (and not totally relevant)... now Microsoft has made public their policy of using Per Processor licensing (as opposed to Per Core). SBS 2003 is currently limited to 2 physical processors, but it can support 4 HyperThreading (virtual) processors. These are great news, because the experts predict that the chip engineering focus will change in the next couple of years to dual-core (instead of just higher transistor density) processors. Now Intel and AMD can build these chips without licensing concerns.

Check out the official statement from Microsoft

Posted: Oct 25 2004, 09:42 AM by Javier | with 1 comment(s)
Filed under:

Comments

TrackBack said:

^_^,Pretty Good!
# April 15, 2005 5:21 PM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required)