Is Security overwhelmed by Malware?
Lately it sure seems so ... almost weekly we see reports of the amount of sites infected, or the amount of malware samples submitted that just boggles the mind. I know in my own little part of the world ... the amount of malicious sites that come and go is stagering to say the least.
Even the big players seem to be overwhelmed ... take Google for instance. They have been on the front lines of identifying malicious sites, and I applaud them for that ... but as with most large companies, it seems the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing ...
While looking for culprits I've found it easier to enter certain search terms into Google and then follow the results ... but when Google's own "Sponsored Links" lead to malicious sites and infections ... it makes you want to screem!
Image edited for display purposes.
Following the above highlighted link ... which redirects to "main-porn-hub(dot)com" which is yet another "Fake.PornTube.Codec"

Clicking any of the above buttons leads to a malicious download from "codecdownload.main-downloadportal(dot)com"
Both of these sites are hosted at Noc4hosts Inc - IP Location - Tampa Florida [66.232.96.0 - 66.232.127.255]
... hey maybe the SunBelt guys should go pay them a visit ... just kidding ...
Anyway ... in checking Google's new "Safe Browsing Diagnostic page" I find that:
"Yes, this site has hosted malicious software over the past 90 days" however in searching Google itself "main-porn-hub(dot)com" is not listed as a Harmful site ... huh? Now if I follow one of the links from that page I find another Fake.PornTube.Codec site ... that redirects back to "main-porn-hub(dot)com"
Image edited for display purposes.
If you want to check a site for yourself simply append it to the end of the following link:
http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=
For whatever reason Google never added a portal to check these sites ...
Now it could be that Google never tied it's Safe Browsing Diagnostic to the Google/Stopbadware effort ... but if not why not? If you are going to do "Security" then be a leader ... don't put forth a half-a*sed effort ... we already have too many of these already.