<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>CRN review: Vista is no more secure than XP? </title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/harrywaldron/archive/2007/05/31/crn-review-vista-is-no-more-secure-than-xp.aspx</link><description>First of all, good security ain&amp;#39;t solely about operating systems themselves It&amp;#39;s more about the process itself. You can implement either OS poorly , not keep them updated, etc. You also need more than just the OS alone to be properly protected</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>MB&amp;#8217;s Windows Security  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Vista and XP are equally at peril to malware&amp;#8230; wait, what?</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/harrywaldron/archive/2007/05/31/crn-review-vista-is-no-more-secure-than-xp.aspx#936285</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 19:08:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:936285</guid><dc:creator>MB’s Windows Security  » Blog Archive   » Vista and XP are equally at peril to malware… wait, what?</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;MB&amp;amp;#8217;s Windows Security &amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;raquo; Blog Archive &amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;raquo; Vista and XP are equally at peril to malware&amp;amp;#8230; wait, what?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=936285" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>