<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>My Notes to Myself and Others... : windows</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: windows</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>BitLocker To Go Reader</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2009/10/31/bitlocker-to-go-reader.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:23:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1736418</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1736418</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2009/10/31/bitlocker-to-go-reader.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="Description"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;BitLocker protection on removable drives is known as BitLocker To Go. When a BitLocker-protected    &lt;br /&gt;removable drive is unlocked on a computer running Windows 7, the drive is automatically recognized    &lt;br /&gt; and the user is either prompted for credentials to unlock the drive or the drive is unlocked automatically     &lt;br /&gt;if configured to do so. Computers running Windows XP or Windows Vista do not automatically recognize    &lt;br /&gt; that the removable drive is BitLocker-protected. With the BitLocker To Go Reader users can unlock the     &lt;br /&gt;BitLocker-protected drives by using a password or a recovery password (also known as a recovery key)    &lt;br /&gt; and gain read-only access to their data.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Download it &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&amp;amp;FamilyID=64851943-78c9-4cd4-8e8d-f551f06f6b3d" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1736418" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx">Microsoft</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Bitlocker/default.aspx">Bitlocker</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Windows+7/default.aspx">Windows 7</category></item><item><title>Snipping tool trick</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2009/10/24/snipping-tool-trick.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:30:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1734637</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1734637</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2009/10/24/snipping-tool-trick.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;I really love the Snipping Tool. It enables me to take screenshots without having    &lt;br /&gt;to install third-party software quite efficiently. I did encounter one very annoying     &lt;br /&gt;issue though when trying to capture context menus or the Start menu- while launching     &lt;br /&gt;the snipping tool these menus disappeared… :(&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;It seems that there is a solution for this issue. To capture a context menu, open the    &lt;br /&gt;Snipping Tool, open the menu you would like to capture and then press Ctrl+PrtScn.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The screen should fade and the familiar interface of the snipping tool should appear.    &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Note that once a screen is captured this will not work again, you will have to reopen the    &lt;br /&gt;snipping tool.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1734637" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx">Microsoft</category></item><item><title>Vista Gets Stuck During File Copy</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2009/01/24/vista-gets-stuck-during-file-copy.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:08:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1665434</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1665434</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2009/01/24/vista-gets-stuck-during-file-copy.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, so this isn’t a new topic. It’s been around for quite a while but I have never    &lt;br /&gt;encountered it, so now that I have- it’s time for a post about it.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;I have installed a new PC (Windows Vista 64bit) and connected it to my home    &lt;br /&gt;network using a wireless NIC (Realtek RTL8168B/8111b). The wireless router I     &lt;br /&gt;use is an Edimax BR-6215SRg. The same network has several other PCs connected     &lt;br /&gt;to it wirelessly and one PC that is wired.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;When copying files to/from the new PC (HTPC) it seemed to simply freeze up. Even    &lt;br /&gt;though I could move the mouse pointer I couldn’t really do anything else…Now keep in     &lt;br /&gt;mind that this is a new PC (and it’s fully patched:SP1 and everything). Since this     &lt;br /&gt;is a new PC I started worrying that I have a hardware issue, yet after some research     &lt;br /&gt;on the Internet I found others that had similar problems due to the TCP receive window     &lt;br /&gt;auto-tuning issue in the new TCP/IP stack.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The advice was to simply turn off the auto-tuning feature by running the following    &lt;br /&gt;command:&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;netsh interface tcp set global autotuninglevel=disabled&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;I decided to give it a try, and not surprisingly it worked. Personally, I find it very odd that    &lt;br /&gt;due to a networking your whole OS freezes up. When dwelling deeper into the issue     &lt;br /&gt;it seems that the new TCP/IP stack tries to manage data flow in a more efficient way by constantly     &lt;br /&gt;tuning the receive window set by TCP. This window allows the receiver to define the amount     &lt;br /&gt;of data it will receive before the sender has to stop data if it hasn’t received acknowledgments.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;In older versions of Windows, the window size was set once (not tuning) which causes data flow    &lt;br /&gt;to be less efficient. Once I disabled the feature, I could see that my copying speed has dropped from     &lt;br /&gt;4.5 to 3.7. On the other hand it no longer froze my system…&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;I am not sure who is at blame here, my gateway, the NICs driver or the favorite target of the last few    &lt;br /&gt;years:Vista…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1665434" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Vista/default.aspx">Vista</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx">Microsoft</category></item><item><title>Service Pack 2 season</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/10/25/service-pack-2-season.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:28:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1651968</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1651968</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/10/25/service-pack-2-season.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Service Pack 2 beta(for TAP clients) has been announced for both Windows Vista and    &lt;br /&gt;Windows 2008:&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2008/10/24/windows-server-2008-service-pack-2-beta.aspx" href="http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2008/10/24/windows-server-2008-service-pack-2-beta.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2008/10/24/windows-server-2008-service-pack-2-beta.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2008/10/24/windows-vista-service-pack-2-beta.aspx" href="http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2008/10/24/windows-vista-service-pack-2-beta.aspx"&gt;http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2008/10/24/windows-vista-service-pack-2-beta.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1651968" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Vista/default.aspx">Vista</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Windows+2008/default.aspx">Windows 2008</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx">Microsoft</category></item><item><title>Let the Panic begin?! (or maybe not…) [MS08-067]</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/10/24/let-the-panic-begin-or-maybe-not-ms08-067.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:04:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1651850</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1651850</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/10/24/let-the-panic-begin-or-maybe-not-ms08-067.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, Microsoft has released an out of band patch (in other words, not through   &lt;br /&gt;the standard cycle of releases,which means it’s really important and there is no time    &lt;br /&gt;to wait for the next cycle) for all Windows version. Such a release, obviously causes    &lt;br /&gt;concerns (as does everything that is not routine).&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The patch is intended for all Windows versions, and it is supposed to plug a hole in   &lt;br /&gt;the Server service (specifically RPC) that might allow an attacker to run arbitrary code    &lt;br /&gt;under the system account (it also seems that the vulnerability is wormable).    &lt;br /&gt;Enter PANIC!!! (or maybe not)&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;First reason to lower the panic levels is that when stating that an attacker can do something we have to ask ourselves   &lt;br /&gt;whether the attacker is an anonymous attacker or an authenticated one (he difference    &lt;br /&gt;is obvious and major). In this case, older Windows version (2000, XP, 2003) are    &lt;br /&gt;vulnerable to an anonymous attack (thus the patch is critical).     &lt;br /&gt;Windows 2008 and Vista are only affected if the attacker is authenticated.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Second, security is a layered art. The vulnerability can only affect systems that do not   &lt;br /&gt;have firewalls that protect them. This statement sounds like a double edged sword:    &lt;br /&gt;on one hand you will obviously not have a firewall block the ports on a system that is    &lt;br /&gt;acting as a server(simply sharing a folder/printer),on the other hand how many personal computers that do not have    &lt;br /&gt;some type of firewall protection do you think are on the Internet today (a lot, but a lot    &lt;br /&gt;less since the days of Blaster).&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Third reason to lower the panic levels is the fact that you are reading this. If your level   &lt;br /&gt;of awareness is high enough to pursue information on the subject it means that you    &lt;br /&gt;are security conscious and that you are protecting your computers and will apply    &lt;br /&gt;the patch. Security conscience has significantly grown which means that systems may    &lt;br /&gt;be hit, yet the damage (effect) will be significantly lower.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;If you managed to bear with me, it’s time to go and patch:   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms08-067.mspx" href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms08-067.mspx"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms08-067.mspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/827267" href="http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/827267"&gt;http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/827267&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1651850" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Security/default.aspx">Security</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category></item><item><title>Windows Vista SP1 available (since Tuesday)</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/03/21/windows-vista-sp1-available-since-tuesday.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:24:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1549253</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1549253</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/03/21/windows-vista-sp1-available-since-tuesday.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/WindowsVistaSP1availablesinceTuesday_90F9/image_2.png"&gt;&lt;img style="border-top-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;" height="58" alt="image" src="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/WindowsVistaSP1availablesinceTuesday_90F9/image_thumb.png" width="219" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Yes I know,a bit late and no I don&amp;#39;t want to get a haircut(you know who you are).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So after these cryptic messages do I have something new to tell you about this release?&lt;br /&gt;Not really,except that finally all those holding out until SP1 can finally install Vista and&lt;br /&gt;that SP1 comes packed with a few new cool features (e.g. the ability to apply Bitlocker&lt;br /&gt;encryption to all volumes including flash based ones...).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In addition to that you may also want take a look at the list of incompatible drivers that&lt;br /&gt;may block the SP from being installed:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=948343" href="http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=948343"&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=948343&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So if you have the time and you finally want to become SP1ed take the plunge!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1549253" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Vista/default.aspx">Vista</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/SP1/default.aspx">SP1</category></item><item><title>Windows Command Line</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/03/14/windows-command-line.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:13:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1542741</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1542741</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/03/14/windows-command-line.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The Windows command line interface is a powerful tool. Most people might shrug away&lt;br /&gt;from it since they feel that it is not flexible enough...to those people I dedicate this post.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Microsoft has a released a command line reference that can be found &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=5fb255ff-72da-4b08-a504-1b10266cf72a&amp;amp;DisplayLang=en" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1542741" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category></item><item><title>Administrative Mode Terminal issues...</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/02/15/administrative-mode-terminal-issues.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:34:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1515004</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1515004</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/02/15/administrative-mode-terminal-issues.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;This was an annoying one. In Windows 2003 you have the Administrative Mode terminal that&lt;br /&gt;allows you to have two standard connection and one &amp;quot;console&amp;quot; connection using RDP (a total of&lt;br /&gt;three (3) concurrent connections).&lt;br /&gt; Well, that is true if the server has not decided to misbehave.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In my case it did. After having two connections to the server (in any combination,console and standard)&lt;br /&gt;the server would not allow a third. Not only would it not allow a third connection but the client also&lt;br /&gt;provided the oddest error message:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/AdministrativeModeTerminalissues_8E08/image_6.png" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img style="border-right:0px;border-top:0px;border-left:0px;border-bottom:0px;" height="50" alt="image" src="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/AdministrativeModeTerminalissues_8E08/image_thumb_2.png" width="244" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Once one of the two connected would disconnect all of sudden the server was found again...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So,at this stage I ruled out any concurrent violations,since if it would be a concurrence limitation&lt;br /&gt;I would have expected the following error message:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/AdministrativeModeTerminalissues_8E08/image_4.png"&gt;&lt;img style="border-right:0px;border-top:0px;border-left:0px;border-bottom:0px;" height="66" alt="image" src="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/AdministrativeModeTerminalissues_8E08/image_thumb_1.png" width="244" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;At first, I thought that this might be a networking/security issue of limited RDP connections to this specific&lt;br /&gt;server (no more then 2)...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;After some continued digging,researching and registry comparing(with a well behaved server) I noticed a difference&lt;br /&gt;between the two:&lt;br /&gt;HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal Server\WinStations\RDP-Tcp\MaxInstanceCount was set&lt;br /&gt; to &amp;quot;2&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;ffffffff&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Once I changed the key I had no problem to connect...and thus the mystery of only two administrative connections&lt;br /&gt;(instead of three) was solved...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;[Now comes the question of how or why was this value changed. The server was a clean installation with SP2 on it.]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1515004" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/RDP/default.aspx">RDP</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Terminal/default.aspx">Terminal</category></item><item><title>Windows Automated Installation Kit 1.1</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/02/08/windows-automated-installation-kit-1-1.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:38:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1503643</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1503643</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/02/08/windows-automated-installation-kit-1-1.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;With support for Vista&amp;#39;s SP1 and Windows 2008.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;u&gt;New features in the Windows AIK&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt; &lt;p&gt;Supports Windows Vista Service Pack 1 and Windows Server 2008 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;li&gt; &lt;p&gt;Supports for Windows Server 2008 &lt;a href="http://trycatch.be/blogs/roggenk/archive/2007/07/13/server-manager-adding-roles-amp-features.aspx"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ServerManagerCmd.exe&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. Documents how to build answer files for the Server Manager CLI used to install and to remove Windows Server 2008 roles, role services, and features.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;li&gt; &lt;p&gt;Support for Windows Server 2008 &lt;strong&gt;ICT (&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://trycatch.be/blogs/roggenk/archive/2007/07/13/deploying-windows-server-2008-initial-configuration-tasks.aspx"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Initial Configuration Tasks&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;)&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Documents schema definitions how to add tasks, links, and branding material to the out-of-box experience.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;li&gt; &lt;p&gt;Supports Windows Setup &lt;strong&gt;cross-platform&lt;/strong&gt; deployment. You can install 64-bit version of Windows from a 32-bit preinstallation environment WinPE.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;li&gt; &lt;p&gt;Contains Windows PE 2.1.  &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Boot from Hard Disk&lt;/b&gt;. Support for booting directly from the hard disk, not into RAM Disk.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;li&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Oscdimg tool&lt;/b&gt;. Updated features including support for larger images.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;li&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Writable RAM drive&lt;/b&gt;. When booting from read-only media, Windows PE automatically creates a writable RAM disk (drive &lt;i&gt;X&lt;/i&gt;) and allocates 32 megabytes (MB) of the RAM disk for general-purpose storage. You can customize the size up to 512 MB using PEImg /scratchspace.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt; &lt;li&gt; &lt;p&gt;Contains several &lt;strong&gt;new tools&lt;/strong&gt; (%programFiles%\Windows AIK\Tools\&amp;lt;platform&amp;gt;) &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt; &lt;p&gt;Driver Package Installer (DPInst).&amp;nbsp; Add non-boot critical drivers during Windows Setup using the Driver Package Installer (DPInst) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;li&gt; &lt;p&gt;Boot critical driver projection tool (PostReflect.exe). &lt;/p&gt; &lt;li&gt; &lt;p&gt;Windows Vista SP1 Files Removal Tool (VSP1Cln.exe).&amp;nbsp; Remove archived Vista RTM files and reclaim disk space after Windows Vista SP1 is applied.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;li&gt; &lt;p&gt;Windows Deployment Services Multicast (WDSmcast.exe).&amp;nbsp; WDSmcast.exe is used by computers to join multicast transmissions offered by a Windows Server 2008 based WDS (Windows Deployment Server).&amp;nbsp; More about this in an upcoming blogpost...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt; &lt;li&gt; &lt;p&gt;Contains Windows &lt;strong&gt;Vista Deployment Error Diagnostic Guide&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Describes how to diagnose error logs related to deploying Windows Vista, specifically how to interpret errors related to Windows Setup (Setup.exe) and Package Manager (Pkgmgr.exe).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=94bb6e34-d890-4932-81a5-5b50c657de08&amp;amp;DisplayLang=en" target="_blank"&gt;Download it here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1503643" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Vista/default.aspx">Vista</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Windows+2008/default.aspx">Windows 2008</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/WAIK/default.aspx">WAIK</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/SP1/default.aspx">SP1</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/vsp1cln/default.aspx">vsp1cln</category></item><item><title>Vista SP1 deployment rants...</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/02/08/vista-sp1-deployment-rants.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 08:54:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1503102</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1503102</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/02/08/vista-sp1-deployment-rants.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;So since SP1 is finally final, I started playing around with it. One of the most important&lt;br /&gt;features for me was the ability to deploy it. So,wanting to hear it from the horses mouth,&lt;br /&gt;I downloaded the &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=e71f0083-1013-4f9c-a3f9-c56e7120a5e9&amp;amp;DisplayLang=en" target="_blank"&gt;Windows Vista SP1 Guides for IT Professionals&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;After going over it I found a few points that surprised me:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ol&gt; &lt;li&gt;No option to slipstream. Integrating the SP into the OS is not possible although&lt;br /&gt;a version that will have SP1 integrated will be made available (?!?). &lt;br /&gt; &lt;li&gt;The SP can not be applied to an offline copy of Windows. This is kind of obvious&lt;br /&gt;if you read the previous point but still,considering that many people use images (WIM)&lt;br /&gt;to deploy desktops having to install it online and then recapturing the image seems&lt;br /&gt;to be somewhat questionable in the light of the automation features (such as offline&lt;br /&gt;driver integration) that WIM images provide...&lt;br /&gt; &lt;li&gt;Still in the image department, if you create an image (or apply the SP to an existing image,&lt;br /&gt;which is more or less the same) you have to run the Boot critical driver tool (PostReflect.exe).&lt;br /&gt;To be honest, I don&amp;#39;t (yet) understand the exact reason as for why you have to run this tool&lt;br /&gt;except the reason provided in the document:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;This is necessary because SP1 contains boot-critical drivers for the hardware abstraction layer (HAL) and matching changes to the kernel. If the updated versions of boot-critical drivers for the HAL and the kernel are not correctly installed on the computer that you are deploying SP1 to, the operating system will not boot on that computer or on any computer that has a different CPU or hardware configuration.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Now that is even more surprising since Vista is considered as an OS that is hardware independent...&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;p&gt;On the brighter side of things, an additional tool that can be found either in the &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=c7d4bc6d-15f3-4284-9123-679830d629f2&amp;amp;displaylang=en&amp;amp;Hash=kanSBrwSjkhvXwikgskmfEu7mkBPF1JWVCFKiHBcxSYkaq%2f%2bXRBeQguM6DDcKVi6T7fVa5Xo%2faT0u4JQKSxNrw%3d%3d" target="_blank"&gt;new version of the AIK&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;br /&gt;%windir%\system32 called Vsp1cln.exe will allow you to clean up all the files that SP1 backs up during the&lt;br /&gt;installation (approximately 800MB).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This tool can be used either online or offline but once it is used you can no longer uninstall SP1 (which is also&lt;br /&gt;kind of obvious, so make your choice wisely).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1503102" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Vista/default.aspx">Vista</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx">Microsoft</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/SP1/default.aspx">SP1</category></item><item><title>Mandatory Integrity Control (What,how and why do we care?)</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/01/19/mandatory-integrity-control-what-how-and-why-do-we-care.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:10:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1470557</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1470557</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/01/19/mandatory-integrity-control-what-how-and-why-do-we-care.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;u&gt;The theory&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Mandatory Integrity Control (MIC) is an additional layer of security built into Vista and&lt;br /&gt;Windows 2008. This particular layer helps Windows protect itself from harmful intentional and unintentional&lt;br /&gt;changes to important objects. Among the objects protected we can find files, directories, registry&lt;br /&gt;key, printers, and actually any object that has a security descriptor.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The beauty of MIC is that it has been there in the background all along protecting you, yet you never knew&lt;br /&gt;it existed. You might have actually encountered it by trying to change a file that is protected by it, and even&lt;br /&gt;though you had the permission you couldn&amp;#39;t...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The MIC layer is a barrier placed before your permissions are checked. Essentially this new road block checks&lt;br /&gt;your privilege level against the object that you are trying to change. If your privilege level is equal or higher you are&lt;br /&gt;allowed to make the change. On the other hand if your privilege is lower you cannot change the object even&lt;br /&gt;though you may have the permission to.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Vista defines four integrity levels in order of precedence from low to high (the Untrusted and Trusted Installer are out&lt;br /&gt;of scope here):&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ol&gt; &lt;li&gt;Low - Used by Internet Explorer 7 to enforce Protected Mode:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/MandatoryIntegrityControlWhathowandwhydo_D18A/image_8.png"&gt;&lt;img style="border-top-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;" height="157" alt="image" src="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/MandatoryIntegrityControlWhathowandwhydo_D18A/image_thumb_3.png" width="244" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;li&gt;Medium - Used for standard users (assumed if no other level is set):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/MandatoryIntegrityControlWhathowandwhydo_D18A/image_6.png"&gt;&lt;img style="border-top-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;" height="154" alt="image" src="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/MandatoryIntegrityControlWhathowandwhydo_D18A/image_thumb_2.png" width="244" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;li&gt;High - Used for administrative actions (CMD with Run as administrator):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/MandatoryIntegrityControlWhathowandwhydo_D18A/image_10.png"&gt;&lt;img style="border-top-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;" height="154" alt="image" src="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/MandatoryIntegrityControlWhathowandwhydo_D18A/image_thumb_4.png" width="244" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;li&gt;System - Used by the system&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/MandatoryIntegrityControlWhathowandwhydo_D18A/image_12.png"&gt;&lt;img style="border-top-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;" height="155" alt="image" src="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/MandatoryIntegrityControlWhathowandwhydo_D18A/image_thumb_5.png" width="244" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;p&gt;Note that what happens is that each privilege level is represented by a different group SID.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Privilege levels are inherited, meaning that the privilege level of the creator is inherited by the object&lt;br /&gt;that is created. If a user opens Notepad the users privilege level is attached to the process and the&lt;br /&gt;file created by the process and so on...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;u&gt;A quick example&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Ok, lets try something practical.&lt;br /&gt;In the following example I will create a new file using an elevated CMD.exe ,view the integrity level by using ICACLS and then&lt;br /&gt;I will try to delete the same file using a standard CMD.EXE...lets see what happens:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/MandatoryIntegrityControlWhathowandwhydo_D18A/image_16.png"&gt;&lt;img style="border-top-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;" height="125" alt="image" src="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/MandatoryIntegrityControlWhathowandwhydo_D18A/image_thumb_7.png" width="244" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Note that CMD was started as an administrator and the file has been created with a privilege level of high (last line&lt;br /&gt;of ICACLS output. The users privilege level is also high (see the WOAMI output and he belong to the Administrators&lt;br /&gt;group).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/MandatoryIntegrityControlWhathowandwhydo_D18A/image_18.png"&gt;&lt;img style="border-top-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;" height="164" alt="image" src="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/MandatoryIntegrityControlWhathowandwhydo_D18A/image_thumb_8.png" width="244" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Note that the second instance of CMD is not run as and administrator. The file is still there, still with a high level of privilege,&lt;br /&gt;the user has permissions (ICACLS and WHOAMI output) yet he can not delete the file.&lt;br /&gt;The reason is that the current privilege of the user is medium (note the output of WHOAMI).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Now to top it off-something odd(or actually normal,depends on how you look at it...). If you attempt to delete the file&lt;br /&gt;from an Explorer window you will receive the following message:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/MandatoryIntegrityControlWhathowandwhydo_D18A/image_20.png"&gt;&lt;img style="border-top-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;" height="99" alt="image" src="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/WindowsLiveWriter/MandatoryIntegrityControlWhathowandwhydo_D18A/image_thumb_9.png" width="244" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Once acknowledged (by pressing Continue) the file will be deleted-what happened here?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Well by choosing to continue you elevated the Explorer processes level to High- thus you can delete the file...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;u&gt;Conclusion&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Based on the above example you can see that MIC is an additional layer of security implanted into Vista. Vista&lt;br /&gt;assigns the level of integrity a specific object belongs too, it&amp;#39;s not configurable and the only way that a user&lt;br /&gt;can elevate his own level of integrity is by interacting with the system an explicitly acknowledging an action(such as&lt;br /&gt;the deletion of the file in our example). A very important point to understand about MIC is that it protects files&lt;br /&gt;from being tampered with,not their privacy. In other words only ACLS will protect the file from being read.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Now I really love to contradict myself (at least I do it in different paragraphs...),there is a way to manipulate&lt;br /&gt;files and even protect it&amp;#39;s contents by using MIC but it&amp;#39;s not a way I would recommend. On the other hand it&amp;#39;s&lt;br /&gt;still good to know and as Mark Minasi mentions what happens if a malware actually creates a file with the privilege&lt;br /&gt;level of System -no one will be able to delete it?!?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Mark has created a tool called CHML.EXE that is a bit more versatile then ICACLS and it allows you to set privilege&lt;br /&gt;levels.&lt;br /&gt;For additional information on CHML look at:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="http://www.minasi.com/vista/chml.htm" href="http://www.minasi.com/vista/chml.htm"&gt;http://www.minasi.com/vista/chml.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1470557" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/General+Computing/default.aspx">General Computing</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Security/default.aspx">Security</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Vista/default.aspx">Vista</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category></item><item><title>The Compare campaign</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/01/19/the-compare-campaign.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:19:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1469822</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1469822</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/01/19/the-compare-campaign.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has built an area in it&amp;#39;s Windows Server website called Compare. Basically this area&lt;br /&gt;will provide content that compares Windows Server to other environments. There several&lt;br /&gt;interesting screencasts and Webcasts there,take a look:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver/compare/windows-server-comparison-screencasts-and-webcasts.mspx" href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver/compare/windows-server-comparison-screencasts-and-webcasts.mspx"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver/compare/windows-server-comparison-screencasts-and-webcasts.mspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver/compare/default.mspx" href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver/compare/default.mspx"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver/compare/default.mspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1469822" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Windows+2008/default.aspx">Windows 2008</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx">Microsoft</category></item><item><title>Timing operations</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/01/19/timing-operations.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:10:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1469815</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1469815</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2008/01/19/timing-operations.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;If you need to know the time that elapsed between two operations you can use the&lt;br /&gt;the following tool from Microsoft(windows 2000 resource kit):&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=913795CD-7026-4143-AE85-1F5E096F9BE0&amp;amp;displaylang=en" href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=913795CD-7026-4143-AE85-1F5E096F9BE0&amp;amp;displaylang=en"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=913795CD-7026-4143-AE85-1F5E096F9BE0&amp;amp;displaylang=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;-----------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;TIMETHIS&amp;nbsp; :&amp;nbsp; Command Timing Utility&lt;br /&gt;-----------------------------------  &lt;p&gt;Usage : TIMETHIS &amp;quot;command&amp;quot;  &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; TimeThis executes the command specified by its arguments, then reports its&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp; run time in HH:MM:SS.TTT format.&amp;nbsp; Quotes around the command are required only&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp; when the command involves redirection via &amp;lt;, &amp;gt;, &amp;gt;&amp;gt;, or |, etc.&amp;nbsp; Quotes ensure&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp; that the redirection is applied to the command being timed, rather than the&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp; TimeThis command itself. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1469815" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Scripting/default.aspx">Scripting</category></item><item><title>An Interview with Mark Russinovich (Channel 9)</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2007/12/21/an-interview-with-mark-russinovich-channel-9.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:29:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1409294</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1409294</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2007/12/21/an-interview-with-mark-russinovich-channel-9.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;I heard Mark Russinovich speak at Tech-Ed Europe in Barcelona (2003) and I found&lt;br /&gt;it to be a great experience, now that he is a part of Microsoft what he has to say&lt;br /&gt;has additional weight since he is a part of the team that works on the Windows kernel&lt;br /&gt;and additional goodies...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I highly recommend taking the 40 minutes and watching the interview with Mark at:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="http://channel9.msdn.com/showpost.aspx?postid=365911" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/showpost.aspx?postid=365911"&gt;http://channel9.msdn.com/showpost.aspx?postid=365911&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1409294" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Windows+2008/default.aspx">Windows 2008</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx">Microsoft</category></item><item><title>System information at the command line</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2007/12/21/system-information-at-the-command-line.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:36:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1408355</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1408355</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2007/12/21/system-information-at-the-command-line.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Ever wanted to get information about your system at the command line?&lt;br /&gt;You could try using the &amp;#39;systeminfo&amp;#39; command that provides a lot of technical information&lt;br /&gt;about the local system, or remote systems. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Among the information provided you can find:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Hardware information&lt;br /&gt;OS information&lt;br /&gt;Hotfix information&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1408355" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Vista/default.aspx">Vista</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Windows+2008/default.aspx">Windows 2008</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx">Microsoft</category></item><item><title>Changing your logon screen (Windows Vista)</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2007/11/30/changing-your-logon-screen-windows-vista.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:21:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1371089</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1371089</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2007/11/30/changing-your-logon-screen-windows-vista.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Since I can remember myself I love customizing stuff. I love changing thins so&lt;br /&gt;they reflect some individuality. Logon screen and desktops are obviously my&lt;br /&gt;favorites when it comes to computers.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I never had the time to check how the logon screen in Vista can be changed but&lt;br /&gt;by chance I bumped into &lt;a href="http://www.download.com/LogonStudio-Vista/3000-2347_4-10696253.html?tag=pdp_prod" target="_blank"&gt;this neat(free) tool&lt;/a&gt;(Logon Studio) from Stardock that&lt;br /&gt; allows you to change the logon screen with your own pictures.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So the next question is where do you get those cool pictures from...well, I get them&lt;br /&gt;from two websites that have very high quality(almost any resolution) pictures:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gamewallpapers.com"&gt;http://www.gamewallpapers.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cgwallpapers.com"&gt;http://www.cgwallpapers.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The websites are not free yet IMHO the price is worth it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1371089" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Vista/default.aspx">Vista</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category></item><item><title>Outlook Sidebar Gadgets for Outlook</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2007/11/30/outlook-sidebar-gadgets-for-outlook.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:08:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1370994</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1370994</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2007/11/30/outlook-sidebar-gadgets-for-outlook.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;When the Vista sidebar was released, I was a bit skeptical. It reminded me of&lt;br /&gt;the old Office toolbar(ok,but not a big hit-at least not with me). Lately I have started&lt;br /&gt;to view it in a different light-you can actually have quite a useful gadget attached to it,you&lt;br /&gt;can build a gadget that will provide directory information for your companies employee&lt;br /&gt;or direct access to your IT staff. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In addition to that two new gadgets were published on the Outlook teams blog: appointments&lt;br /&gt;and tasks. Take a look at the &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/outlook/archive/2007/11/30/outlook-2007-gadgets-for-windows-sidebar.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1370994" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Vista/default.aspx">Vista</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx">Microsoft</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Outlook/default.aspx">Outlook</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Sidebar/default.aspx">Sidebar</category></item><item><title>Remote Server Administration Tools (RSAT) Beta is now available</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2007/11/30/remote-server-administration-tools-rsat-beta-is-now-available.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:29:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1370869</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1370869</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2007/11/30/remote-server-administration-tools-rsat-beta-is-now-available.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Basically provides you with remote management tools for Windows 2008.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://connect.microsoft.com/windows/Downloads/DownloadDetails.aspx?DownloadID=9561"&gt;http://connect.microsoft.com/windows/Downloads/DownloadDetails.aspx?DownloadID=9561&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Also,check out the &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/11/28/remote-server-administration-tools-rsat-beta-is-now-available.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; on the Windows Server Division Blog.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1370869" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Server/default.aspx">Server</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Windows+2008/default.aspx">Windows 2008</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Server+Core/default.aspx">Server Core</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx">Microsoft</category></item><item><title>Converting EVT files to EVTX</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2007/10/13/converting-evt-files-to-evtx.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 09:22:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1246392</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1246392</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2007/10/13/converting-evt-files-to-evtx.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;I stumbled upon a good &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/askperf/archive/2007/10/12/windows-vista-and-exported-event-log-files.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; on the &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/askperf/default.aspx"&gt;Ask the Performance Team&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;blog that explains how&lt;br /&gt;to convert EVT files(old event log files) to EVTX (the format used in Vista).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/askperf/archive/2007/10/12/windows-vista-and-exported-event-log-files.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; provides several methods to undertake the task.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:f03027dd-17cf-4bfa-bbc2-0c12b2c291b3" style="padding-right:0px;display:inline;padding-left:0px;padding-bottom:0px;margin:0px;padding-top:0px;"&gt;Technorati Tags: &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Microsoft" rel="tag"&gt;Microsoft&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Windows%202008" rel="tag"&gt;Windows 2008&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Vista" rel="tag"&gt;Vista&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1246392" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Windows+2008/default.aspx">Windows 2008</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx">Microsoft</category></item><item><title>Pre-SP1 Vista Patches</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2007/10/04/pre-sp1-vista-patches.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:14:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1229987</guid><dc:creator>Erik Rozman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1229987</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/2007/10/04/pre-sp1-vista-patches.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;KB941229&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=48477121-4427-483d-8309-4c18de611bd4&amp;amp;displaylang=en&amp;amp;tm"&gt;(x86)&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=dc17da0a-46a9-4cd7-88f1-e8c576f8e585&amp;amp;displaylang=en&amp;amp;tm"&gt;(x64)&lt;/a&gt;: This update addresses issues with Media Center for Microsoft Vista.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;KB941651&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=82738f1a-eea4-4bbe-b3b8-fa25e4faff81&amp;amp;displaylang=en&amp;amp;tm"&gt;(x86)&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=bba3d78a-cb21-44d6-bb04-1e39ebdf46da&amp;amp;displaylang=en&amp;amp;tm"&gt;(x64)&lt;/a&gt;: This is a reliability update. Install this update to improve the reliability&lt;br /&gt; of Windows Media Player 11 for Windows Vista in certain scenarios.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;KB941600&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=dab2055a-eb6b-40e3-ae83-5200b7ef497b&amp;amp;displaylang=en&amp;amp;tm"&gt;(x86)&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=a7ac2f4d-e66c-4b1c-bbda-1c6a9f18b14c&amp;amp;displaylang=en&amp;amp;tm"&gt;(x64)&lt;/a&gt;: This update resolves some reliability issues in the USB core components&lt;br /&gt; on the Windows Vista operating system.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;KB941649&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=e3992046-32b9-4a0d-9e02-acba698aa675&amp;amp;displaylang=en&amp;amp;tm"&gt;(x86)&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=06011901-df0c-4474-8c2c-72c09b7cec04&amp;amp;displaylang=en&amp;amp;tm"&gt;(x64)&lt;/a&gt;: This update resolves some compatibility and reliability issues in Windows&lt;br /&gt; Vista. By applying this update, you can achieve better reliability and hardware compatibility in various scenarios.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:efdce3fb-34db-4c4b-a5fd-a8e9adf7f5cd" style="padding-right:0px;display:inline;padding-left:0px;padding-bottom:0px;margin:0px;padding-top:0px;"&gt;Technorati Tags: &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Microsoft" rel="tag"&gt;Microsoft&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Windows" rel="tag"&gt;Windows&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Vista" rel="tag"&gt;Vista&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1229987" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Vista/default.aspx">Vista</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/windows/default.aspx">windows</category><category domain="http://msmvps.com/blogs/erikr/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx">Microsoft</category></item></channel></rss>