<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Why Do I Have To Patch Windows - Shouldn't It Have Been Made Secure with Windows 3.0?</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/dgosling/pages/why-do-i-have-to-patch-windows-shouldn-t-it-have-been-made-secure-with-windows-3-0.aspx</link><description>Recently I was asked this question : &amp;quot;Why do we have to patch Windows all the time? Couldn&amp;#39;t Microsoft have built a secure OS from day 1 for Windows 3.0, Windows 95 or any of the other OS&amp;#39;s so it doesn’t have to be patched?&amp;quot;</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator></channel></rss>