<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Blaming the Victims of Security Breaches</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/debshinder/archive/2004/06/23/8835.aspx</link><description>The &amp;#8220;blame the victim&amp;#8221; mentality is prevalent in many facets of society today. Cities pass ordinances that make it an offense to leave things of value in view inside your vehicle, lest some just-in-time thief be tempted and break in to take</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re:Blaming the Victims of Security Breaches</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/debshinder/archive/2004/06/23/8835.aspx#58978</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:58978</guid><dc:creator>TrackBack</dc:creator><description>Blaming the Victims of Security Breachesooeess&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=58978" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re:Blaming the Victims of Security Breaches</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/debshinder/archive/2004/06/23/8835.aspx#48038</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 01:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:48038</guid><dc:creator>TrackBack</dc:creator><description>^_~,pretty good!csharpsseeoo&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=48038" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re:Blaming the Victims of Security Breaches</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/debshinder/archive/2004/06/23/8835.aspx#42843</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2005 08:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:42843</guid><dc:creator>TrackBack</dc:creator><description>^_^,Pretty Good!&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=42843" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Blaming the Victims of Security Breaches</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/debshinder/archive/2004/06/23/8835.aspx#9161</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:9161</guid><dc:creator>debshinder</dc:creator><description>You buy a car.  You hear on the news that you have to do things to maintain your car.  Your  car tells you that you have to maintain it.  Professional drivers also tell you to maintain your car.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Despite all this, you don't maintain your car.  It blows up.  Worse - something happens whilst driving it and you cause significant financial loss (hopefully not - but actually physically hurting yourself/others).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know!  The car manufacturer or the car dealer that sold you the car is at fault - because they sold you something shoddy that doesn't heal itself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The same car that I bought in 1948 is not running the same as the day I bought it.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9161" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Blaming the Victims of Security Breaches</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/debshinder/archive/2004/06/23/8835.aspx#9066</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:9066</guid><dc:creator>debshinder</dc:creator><description>I particularly like the statement (paragraph 6) that &amp;quot;security and accessibility are on opposite ends of the continuum&amp;quot;. When I was working as a consulting engineer to the U.S. Air Defense Command there were multiple layers of security in place to keep a missile from being fired in error. As the launch sequence became more complex the probability that we could purposely fire a missile when we actually wanted to was drastically reduced. We used to joke, only partly kidding, that the only completely safe missile was one that was impossible to fire under any circumstances. It all comes down to the skill of the operator. It doesn't make any difference if it is a ground to air missle, a 1911A1, or a computer system. Skill and judgement are what makes the difference, but no matter what the outcome it is the perpetrator that is the problem, not the victim. Those who argue otherwise are a bunch of idiots.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9066" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>