<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Exchange 2003 sp2 coming out this fall - we can now store more spam!</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2005/06/06/50822.aspx</link><description>http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/2003/sp2/faq.mspx Based on feedback from customers like you and because of the evolution of e-mail usage, we are increasing the storage limit for Exchange Server 2003 Standard Edition with SP2 to 75 gigabyte</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: Exchange 2003 sp2 coming out this fall - we can now store more spam!</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2005/06/06/50822.aspx#50950</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 12:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:50950</guid><dc:creator>bradley</dc:creator><description>More space Nice.. verry wanted feature...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So just how many days will a defrag/recovery take on my customers predicted 60+GB store????.. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It may have been more sensible to allow multiple stores; That way any single corruption or failure is limited in it's impact and has good prospects for recovery within a reasonable timeframe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=50950" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Exchange 2003 sp2 coming out this fall - we can now store more spam!</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2005/06/06/50822.aspx#50863</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 18:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:50863</guid><dc:creator>bradley</dc:creator><description>Store more spam?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The big complaint before was the store was to small. If spam is the problem, fix that rather than add space to it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As you allude to, spam is going to be a problem with you have 1 mb or 1 terabyte.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The good news is SP2 is going to include the IMF by default as well, so that should help on the SPAM front as well.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=50863" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>You might want to rethink your partitions</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2005/06/06/50822.aspx#50851</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:12:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:50851</guid><dc:creator>TrackBack</dc:creator><description>&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=50851" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>You might want to rethink your partitions</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2005/06/06/50822.aspx#50849</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:50849</guid><dc:creator>TrackBack</dc:creator><description>&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=50849" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>