Why SBS may not be right for a firm that merges (and why can't we kill off the second DC rumor?)http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2008/09/11/why-sbs-may-not-be-right-for-a-firm-that-merges-and-why-can-t-we-kill-off-the-second-dc-rumor.aspxiTWire - How Linux is keeping Microsoft honest (and why SBS sucks): http://www.itwire.com/content/view/20579/1141/1/0/ So David, love the title of the article, you got my eyeballs looking at it. Congrats on that. First and foremost can we put one mythenCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)re: Why SBS may not be right for a firm that merges (and why can't we kill off the second DC rumor?)http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2008/09/11/why-sbs-may-not-be-right-for-a-firm-that-merges-and-why-can-t-we-kill-off-the-second-dc-rumor.aspx#1647733Sun, 14 Sep 2008 09:59:41 GMTd67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1647733Oliver Sommer<p>I also read he meantioned that you need to leave internal PCs turned on to acess them using RWW.</p> <p>Yes, that&#39;s right they need to be turned on, but there is a solution available to this issue: WakeOnLAN 4 RWW !</p> <p>See our Website: <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://wol4rww.de">http://wol4rww.de</a></p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1647733" width="1" height="1">re: Why SBS may not be right for a firm that merges (and why can't we kill off the second DC rumor?)http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2008/09/11/why-sbs-may-not-be-right-for-a-firm-that-merges-and-why-can-t-we-kill-off-the-second-dc-rumor.aspx#1647558Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:51:10 GMTd67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1647558Mark Crall<p>What? &nbsp;You can have a second DC? &nbsp;Phew! &nbsp;I was ready to go sell operating systems that offered free support on russian news groups. &nbsp;;-)</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1647558" width="1" height="1">