<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Our master is business</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2008/08/29/our-master-is-business.aspx</link><description>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/29/hakon_lie_ie8_interoperability/ There are times I really want geeks to understand that technology serves a master. That master is business. I really don&amp;#39;t care if the Intranet settings on IE8 to not conform</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: Our master is business</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2008/08/29/our-master-is-business.aspx#1646329</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:01:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1646329</guid><dc:creator>Chris Knight</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If your business is developing Web sites, then good implementation of standards in browsers is a big deal - in fact it does highlight that technology does need to help and not to hinder, especially in the implementation of good browser-agnostic sites.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But for the browser consumers you&amp;#39;re right - unless we&amp;#39;re interested in a choice of browsers, so long as it works we don&amp;#39;t really care if it&amp;#39;s standards-compliant or not. Heck if IE 5.5 was compliant we&amp;#39;d have no XmlHttpRequest and where would we be now?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1646329" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>