Patching this month SBS 2003 sp2 standard

re: Patching this month SBS 2003 sp2 standard

Dean — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:42:44 GMT

OK then why do the version/build numbers read as 090.3068.00 and in the KB chart they read as 9.00.3042 ? Should there not be some consistency here ? I mean 090 is different from 9

re: Patching this month SBS 2003 sp2 standard

bradley — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:05:32 GMT

Build and Version numbers are indentifying the same thing. The last part of the File Version has 90.3068.00... that 9.00.3068 is what SQL refers to as the build number.

Patch Tuesday triggered it.

And if you want to see how to confirm that all of your SQL instances are patched manually per your eyeballs, that's how to do it.

re: Patching this month SBS 2003 sp2 standard

Dean — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:00:18 GMT

Could you back up a little bit and explain how you even got on this topic ? What triggered it ? Then could you explain what the difference is between a "build" number and a "version" number ? In all the screen shots you highlight version numbers but in the article you talk about build numbers. They don't seem to match up number wise.