Why Vista?

re: Why Vista?

bradley — Sun, 11 May 2008 09:43:59 GMT

Because I do later plan to switch.

Vista performance « SMB Thoughts by Brian Williams

Vista performance « SMB Thoughts by Brian Williams — Sun, 11 May 2008 09:32:19 GMT

Pingback from Vista performance « SMB Thoughts by Brian Williams

re: Why Vista?

Steve Banks — Sun, 11 May 2008 07:02:31 GMT

As we talked about this afternoon during the presentation at SBS Migration, I do not and will not subscribe to turning off UAC on a server Susan. I treat the server better than my client PCs and that means that I want tighter security on there, not more lax for my convenience as I'm working on it. UAC is not an annoyance; it is a new necessary precaution that elevates when I allow it to. Apple has had this for years in OS X and users even have to drop in their password, so what's all the fuss about clicking okay or cancel in Vista or Server 2008? Why shut off something that is there to keep you safe? Makes no sense to me.

re: Why Vista?

P. R. Petitt — Sun, 11 May 2008 01:39:03 GMT

4 gigs even better and I'm still 32bit.

Although 32 bit vista reports 4gb, it is still only using 3gb,(you can verify in Task Manager), so why is 4gb better unless you plan to switch to 64 bit someday?

Surprisingly little sharing of ideas from SMB Conferences « SMB Thoughts by Brian Williams

Sat, 10 May 2008 23:56:23 GMT

Pingback from Surprisingly little sharing of ideas from SMB Conferences « SMB Thoughts by Brian Williams

Surprisingly little sharing of ideas from SMB Conferences « SMB Thoughts by Brian Williams

Sat, 10 May 2008 23:56:20 GMT

Pingback from Surprisingly little sharing of ideas from SMB Conferences « SMB Thoughts by Brian Williams