<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Contracts and IT firms</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2008/05/09/contracts-and-it-firms.aspx</link><description>Calling out Cindy&amp;#39;s comment about how CPA and Attorney firms don&amp;#39;t have contracts and so why should IT firms have contracts. We do have contracts. They are called in the CPA biz &amp;quot;Engagement letters&amp;quot;. Our malpractice requires that we</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Interesting Finds: May 10, 2008</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2008/05/09/contracts-and-it-firms.aspx#1618916</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 16:15:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1618916</guid><dc:creator>Jason Haley</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1618916" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Contracts and IT firms</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2008/05/09/contracts-and-it-firms.aspx#1618581</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 02:22:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1618581</guid><dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We don&amp;#39;t engage with a Customer under any circumstances w/o an executed written contract. The assumptions, expectations, requirements, and exclusions need to be out in the open at the beginning of the relationship. Nothing good has ever come from &amp;quot;Well, I just assumed...&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;I thought you said...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Marco&amp;#39;s comment interests me a bit. I wonder what he&amp;#39;s talking about re: &amp;quot;if there&amp;#39;s an &amp;#39;easy&amp;#39; 30 out.&amp;quot; I&amp;#39;d love to hear some elaboration on what that means.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1618581" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Contracts and IT firms</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2008/05/09/contracts-and-it-firms.aspx#1618411</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:59:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1618411</guid><dc:creator>marco</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the comment was more related to the &amp;#39;value&amp;#39; of the agreement related to recurring revenue? What&amp;#39;s the value of the agreement / practice if there&amp;#39;s an &amp;#39;easy&amp;#39; 30 out. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1618411" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>