<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>VSS hotfixes</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2007/09/18/vss-hotfixes.aspx</link><description>On the topic of VSS hotfixes, Chris was saying that the optimal VSS hotfixes are now: A new Volume Shadow Copy Service update is now available that fixes various Volume Shadow Copy Service problems in Windows Server 2003: http://support.microsoft.com</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: VSS hotfixes</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2007/09/18/vss-hotfixes.aspx#1205016</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:39:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1205016</guid><dc:creator>indy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I find it rather amusing that we&amp;#39;re still dealing with VSS issues many years after introduction. &amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;d say this particular feature has been a failure from day one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When dealing with file integrity, these sort of screwups seem like a no-no...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1205016" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>