<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>I vote for "understand" WGA</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2006/07/31/106290.aspx</link><description>Vlad links to a way to "disable" WGA but I'd strongly recommend that if your machine is failing WGA authentication and you beleive that you are a legal owner of MS software that you make your voice heard. 1. The WGA folks talk about a WGA "roadmap"..</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: I vote for &amp;quot;understand&amp;quot; WGA</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2006/07/31/106290.aspx#106335</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:01:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:106335</guid><dc:creator>indy</dc:creator><description>I'd understand WGA if the checks were say every 6 months, or every year. &amp;nbsp;Right now it's spyware, it's a &amp;nbsp;malware for my legit customers, and false positives now or in the future effect their bottom line and are embarrassing all around.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We have WSUS crits now on hold, we don't want this rolled out because we imaged OEM based boxes, only to find out later that that isn't &amp;quot;kosher,&amp;quot; even though they have different OEM stickers all over them. &amp;nbsp;Will we be tagged?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=106335" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>