[There's a reason that Yoda is the unofficial mascot of SBS.  Size indeed matters not.] November 2012 - Posts - THE OFFICIAL BLOG OF THE SBS DIVA

November 2012 - Posts

SBS SA Make-Good is NOT, Microsoft should be ashamed of itself. @ HandyAndy’s SBS-Rocks Blog:
http://blog.sbs-rocks.com/2012/11/sbs-sa-make-good-is-not-microsoft-should-be-ashamed-of-itself/

I agree with Andy.  I as a customer feel like Microsoft dropped the ball on me.

The make good on SA should make a customer whole. In Andy's case where he wants physical servers, it's not, in my case where I want/plan to virtualize it's not. I'm still one operating system short to be able to install SharePoint somewhere.

Posted Thu, Nov 29 2012 12:45 by bradley | 5 comment(s)
Filed under:

Windows MultiPoint Server 2012 released to manufacturing, available for evaluation today! - Windows MultiPoint Server Team Blog - Site Home - TechNet Blogs:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/multipointserver/archive/2012/11/27/windows-multipoint-server-2012-has-rtm-d.aspx

Posted Thu, Nov 29 2012 12:42 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

I officially am 5 Windows 8 licenses of that 40 million

Microsoft Sells 40 Million Windows 8 Licenses (But to Whom?) | The VAR Guy:
http://www.thevarguy.com/2012/11/27/microsoft-sells-40-million-windows-8-licenses-but-to-whom/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheVarGuy+%28The+VAR+Guy%29&utm_content=FaceBook

As a Software Assurance customer of Windows desktops, 5 out of the 40 million licenses sold were to me.

Of that number I have -zero- installed on actual machines and don't plan to install on a desktop in the near future.

I am still eyeing up a replacement ... heck my baby laptop is so dead these days - for my baby laptop and am looking towards a unit that I'm hoping will be coming out soon on AT&T....but I don't think all 40 million of those licenses are installed.

Posted Wed, Nov 28 2012 0:00 by bradley | 1 comment(s)
Filed under:

Proving that a Surface RT device can RWA back into a SBS box.

Posted Mon, Nov 26 2012 22:27 by bradley | 5 comment(s)
Filed under:

Giving Tuesday:
http://www.thegatesnotes.com/Personal/Giving-Tuesday?WT.mc_id=11_26_2012_Giving1_tw&WT.tsrc=Twitter

Don't forget to give to places that give you good information... like http://krebsonsecurity.com/

Posted Mon, Nov 26 2012 21:43 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:


TechSoup : Email - Fundraising Tools; Windows 8 in Action; Servers:
http://tsg.convio.net/site/MessageViewer?em_id=11801.0&dlv_id=15401#topic3

"Windows Server 2012 Essentials is now available at TechSoup! This edition of Windows Server is designed for small organizations with up to 25 users and 50 devices. Windows Server 2012 has a new user interface that looks similar to Windows 8's Start Screen.

Posted Mon, Nov 26 2012 20:34 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

..no the issue is not with the TV show but with how networking is handling NCIS.

Windows 7 in SBS2003 Premium network - yellow triangle mark on network icon:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/smallbusinessserver/thread/18fa6b27-126c-44b2-bcab-340c3828fa63

and

OpenDNS Community > Forums > "Additional log on information may be 
required" pop up warning issue:
http://forums.opendns.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=16465&page=2

Both done in by how they handled NCIS reporting.
Posted Mon, Nov 26 2012 17:25 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

... so I renewed my Microsoft partner network membership and lost a competency.

 

As of December 16, 2012 I'm no longer competent.  Well in Microsoft's eyes anyway.  I'm merely a network member with an Action pack subscription. 

Posted Mon, Nov 26 2012 15:38 by bradley | 3 comment(s)
Filed under:

Microsoft's client-access licensing and pricing changes to hit December 1 | ZDNet:
http://www.zdnet.com/microsofts-client-access-licensing-and-pricing-changes-to-hit-december-1-7000007916/?s_cid=e550
Microsoft recently notified partners about enterprise Client Access Licenses (CALs) changes so they can inform customers about their options before the changes take effect on December 1, 2012. These CAL changes include a user-based option that offers more value in support across unlimited devices and simplifies licensing management and compliance as devices in the workplace proliferate. Pricing for user CALs will change to reflect the increased value. Customers should work with their Microsoft partner or account team to assess their options.”


No, you recently sent notices to distis who MAY have sent notices to partners.

I am still officially a Microsoft partner and I don't recall getting any such official notice from Microsoft.  I've not received one from my license reseller.  I've only stumbled across it because others who had more on the ball TPAM (technical partner account manager) forwarded what they got to me.  So if Microsoft thinks they have informed their partners... I'd argue otherwise.

As we start deploying more of the Essentials stack, the log files move a bit.  In the past I would ask for the sbssetup.log file if any migration or install issues cropped up.  Now with Essentials I'll be asking for a different log file.

In particular I'll be asking for a log file called ConfigSvc.log and it will be located in a hidden folder C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows Server\Logs\

If you have any errors during the install it will be logged in ConfigErrors.log

Posted Sun, Nov 25 2012 22:53 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

How to Manage the Remote Desktop Gateway Service in SBS 2011 Standard , SBS 2011 Essentials and Windows Server 2012 Essentials.:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2472211/en-us?sd=rss&spid=16526&wa=wsignin1.0

When you fire up Windows 2012 Essentials you'll need to do the DISM command if you want to fire up the RD Gateway service mmc console.

Just keep that in mind as you start testing out the server.

Posted Sat, Nov 24 2012 15:59 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

ooh a wireless device from AT&T

Samsung ATIV smart PC - Misty Blue tablet from AT&T:
http://www.att.com/shop/wireless/devices/samsung/ativ-smart-pc-misty-blue.html#fbid=gxD1Nr4SbI0
That's a Win8

ASUS VivoTab RT - Amethyst Gray tablet from AT&T:
http://www.att.com/shop/wireless/devices/asus/vivotab-rt-amethyst-gray.html#fbid=gxD1Nr4SbI0
That's a RT unit

Posted Thu, Nov 22 2012 23:00 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

Tomorrow is the American day of football and food, and more importantly for doing new recipes.

And are you working on your IT recipes?  One alternative recipe to look at is Kerio connect http://kb.kerio.com/article/installing-kerio-connect-1124.html on Foundation server.  Why foundation? 

1.  it's under 15 users and that's a nice spot/size for a kerio deployment.

2.  It doesn't have anything else on the IIS web site to then have to deal with.  It will install what it needs on the IIS.  But what about RWA?  I hear you saying.  Well there's a couple of ways you can offer that.... first up use something like Logmein as an alternative or install a Storage Server 2008 R2 Essentials whic offers up a RWA portal.  Bottom line, if you haven't cooked in the kitchen in a while, now's the time to download the stuff and realearn.

ISC Diary | Behind the Random NTP Bizarreness of Incorrect Year Being Set:
http://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?n&storyid=14548

If you had some computers revert back to the year 2000.... no you didn't time travel or have a bad DST patch. 

Posted Tue, Nov 20 2012 11:02 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

Apparently we're on v3 of the Exchange updates:

This update rollup is being rereleased to address additional
vulnerabilities that were identified in the previous fix for the issue
that is described in Microsoft Security Bulletin MS12-058 - Critical
<http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/Bulletin/MS12-058>
(http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/Bulletin/MS12-058)
.Description of Update Rollup 7 Version 3 for Exchange Server 2010
Service Pack 1:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;2778158&wa=wsignin1.0
===============

Description of Update Rollup 7 Version 3 for Exchange Server 2010
Service Pack 1:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;2778158&wa=wsignin1.0
This update rollup is being rereleased to address additional
vulnerabilities that were identified in the previous fix for the issue
that is described in Microsoft Security Bulletin MS12-058 - Critical
<http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/Bulletin/MS12-058>
(http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/Bulletin/MS12-058)
.


Say what again?
And why can't I find this rerelease info anywhere on a MS security page
about these rereleases?
And it appears that there may be issues with these rereleases?
https://twitter.com/schnoll

Two PR disasters for the Exchange team in a week. Not good - Tony Redmond's Exchange Unwashed Blog:
http://www.windowsitpro.com/blog/tony-redmonds-exchange-unwashed-50/exchange-server/two-pr-disasters-exchange-team-144821

I think he's missing one PR snafu.. one where the re-release a v3 of a security update with the description that "it's fixing vulnerabilities found in the original release" and don't tell anyone.  And then they are only on the download site on the MU or WSUS.

 

Posted Mon, Nov 19 2012 23:59 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

Welcome to the first stages of grief in the death of SBS.  But here's the thing, it's not really dead, just badly mangled in a mess of a public relations.  There are still small busnesses that need small business sized solutions.  There are still small business consultants.  There just isn't as obvious of solutions in your tool bag.

"Can you talk to Microsoft to bring back SBS?"  Honestly no.  Microsoft is trying to remain relevant in a world where more and more tablets are being sold and less and less desktops are.  So building another copy of SBS isn't in their product roadmap.  Besides, come on be honest with yourself, you don't want another SBS, you want on premise file and print and on premise email.  You don't want SharePoint.  You don't want the patching headaches. 

"What are they thinking? My clients don't want the cloud".  I'll bet they want parts of the cloud, but not everything in the cloud.  They want mail hygiene.  They want large file transfers.  They may not even mind their email in the cloud.  They won't put file and printer sharing there. 

"What were they thinking about this Win8 stuff?  I mean this is worse than office's ribbon bar?  Promise me this holday season you'll try to find a "Popup" store whereby Windows RT devices are being sold.  You'll see the power of touch in those devices.  It's not a desktop operating system.  For those folks you probably want to look at somethng like start8 menu. 

But bottom line, this is time to invest in yourself.  Something that you'll been relying too on Microsoft to hand feed us.  Now it's in our ball court,

Consider me your grief counselor.  We're going to look at solutions going forward.

Posted Sat, Nov 17 2012 9:22 by bradley | 8 comment(s)
Filed under:

Guess again.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj247582.aspx

So you have a client with 30 users and they need Remote web access and they need to move off of SBS 2003 and you want to use Office 365?  And you think that you cannot use Windows 2012 Essentials because it limits users to 25?

Guess again.  You can "transmog" or buy a Windows 2012 standard product key and through a DISM command you can "unlock" the cal users past 25.

 

Windows Server® 2012 Essentials supports up to 25 users and 50 devices. When your business needs exceed the limit, you can perform an in-place license transition from Windows Server 2012 Essentials to Windows Server® 2012 Standard, in order to remain license compliant.

After you transition to Windows Server 2012 Standard, the user account and devices limits are removed, but the features that are unique to Windows Server 2012 Essentials (such as the Dashboard, Remote Web Access, and client computer backup), still remain available. However, technical limitations for these features support a maximum of 75 user accounts and 75 devices. If it becomes necessary to add more than 75 user accounts or devices, you should turn off the Windows Server 2012 Essentials features and use the Windows Server 2012 Standard native tools to manage user accounts and devices.

ImportantImportant
Windows Server 2012 Standard requires a Client Access License (CAL) for each user or device in your environment. This is different from Windows Server 2012 Essentials, which does not use the CAL model and does not come with any CALs. When transitioning from Windows Server 2012 Essentials to Windows Server 2012 Standard, you will need to purchase the appropriate number and type of CALs for your environment (most customers purchase user CALs).
Posted Thu, Nov 15 2012 13:13 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

On the download site but not yet on MU

http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=35740

Update Rollup 5 for Exchange Server 2010 Service Pack 2 resolves issues that were found in Exchange Server 2010 Service Pack 2 since the software was released. This update rollup is highly recommended for all Exchange Server 2010 Service Pack 2 customers

Update Rollup 5 for Exchange Server 2010 SP2 resolves the issues that are described in the following Microsoft Knowledge Base (KB) articles:

  • 2707146 IRM-protected messages cannot be returned in search results if the messages are recorded and sent to an external contact in an Exchange Server 2010 environment
  • 2710975 Some MAPI property objects in an ANSI .pst file contain unreadable characters if you import the file by using the "New-MailboxImportRequest" cmdlet
  • 2712001 ExTRA.exe does not collect data if you select a scheduled task for a data collection in an Exchange Server 2010 environment
  • 2712595 Microsoft Exchange RPC Client Access service crashes when you run the New-MailboxExportRequest cmdlet in an Exchange Server 2010 environment
  • 2716145 Store.exe crashes on an Exchange Server 2010 mailbox server if a VSAPI based antivirus software is used
  • 2717522 Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service crashes on an Exchange Server 2010 server when you update the OAB that contains a DBCS address list
  • 2720017 An RBAC role assignee can unexpectedly change a DAG that is outside the management role group scope in an Exchange Server 2010 environment
  • 2727802 Microsoft Exchange Replication service crashes intermittently when you try to move mailboxes from an Exchange Server 2003 server to an Exchange Server 2010 server
  • 2733415 Event ID 1 is logged on the Exchange Server 2010 Client Access server in a mixed Exchange Server 2010 and Exchange Server 2003 environment
  • 2733609 Email message and NDR message are not delivered if an email message contains unsupported character sets in an Exchange Server 2010 environment
  • 2743761 DAG loses quorum if a router or switch issue occurs in an Exchange Server 2010 environment
  • 2748766 Retention policy information does not show "expiration suspended" in Outlook Web App when the mailbox is set to retention hold in an Exchange Server 2010 environment
  • 2748767 You receive an NDR message that incorrectly contains recipients of successful message delivery in an Exchange Server 2010 environment
  • 2748870 Declined meeting request is added back to your calendar after a delegate opens the request by using Outlook 2010
  • 2748879 You cannot access a mailbox by using an EWS application in an Exchange Server 2010 environment
  • 2749075 A copy of an archived item remains in the Recoverable Items folder of a primary mailbox in an Exchange Server 2010 environment
  • 2749593 Outlook logging file lists all the accepted and internal relay domains in the Exchange Server 2010 organization when you enable troubleshooting logging
  • 2750293 Items remain in the "Recoverable Items\Deletions" folder after the retention age limit is reached in an Exchange Server 2010 environment
  • 2750847 An Exchange Server 2010 user unexpectedly uses a public folder server that is located far away or on a slow network
  • 2763886 "The operation failed" error in the Outlook client when you open a saved message from the Drafts folder and then try to send it in an Exchange Server 2010 environment

For the time being skip kb2750841.... http://forums.opendns.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=16465

It's an optional update/non security one.  And until a proper resolution comes from the OpenDNS folks, best to wait on the sidelines.

Posted Tue, Nov 13 2012 23:58 by bradley | 4 comment(s)
Filed under:

http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/news/Press/2012/Nov12/11-12AnnouncementPR.aspx

Wow.  I bit ironic on a night that we took a special run to a Microsoft "popup store" to get some surface machines that Sinofsky left/was shown the door,

http://allthingsd.com/20121112/breaking-windows-head-steven-sinofsky-to-leave-microsoft/

Wow.  It would be interesting to be a fly on the wall in that meeting.

Posted Mon, Nov 12 2012 22:02 by bradley | 1 comment(s)
Filed under:
More Posts Next page »