[There's a reason that Yoda is the unofficial mascot of SBS.  Size indeed matters not.] January 2012 - Posts - THE OFFICIAL BLOG OF THE SBS DIVA

January 2012 - Posts

Office 365: Small Business Server 2011 Essentials Integration:
http://www.winsupersite.com/article/office-365/office-365-small-business-server-2011-esoffice-365-small-business-server-2011-essentials-integration-142116

Final thoughts, and a wrench in the plan for integration

Integrating Office 365 and Windows Small Business Server 2011 Essentials user accounts is an interesting idea and one that allows Microsoft's latest SMB entry to compete on a more even footing with the traditional SBS offering. That said, I'm not sure what the potential audience size is here. While Office 365 is doing quite well, SBSE--like WHS 2011--seems mired in disinterest, with very few server maker offerings (SBSE is typically sold with new hardware) and little in the way of buzz.

That's too bad, but then both of these products also suffer from the same basic problem: Configuring them is far too complicated for the intended small business audience. I wrote about the difficulty of just configuring Office 365 for a custom domain for email previously, but the truth is, I glossed over how difficult the similar custom domain configuration for SBSE remote access can be in my note above. Asking a typical SMB worker to undergo either of these tasks could be frustrating and ultimately futile.

My advice here is simple: Both Office 365 and Windows Small Business Server 2011 Essentials offer excellent functionality for small businesses, and integrating them in a "better together" fashion makes even more sense, but only assuming that you can get someone else to do it. This is an excellent opportunity for Microsoft's partner ecosystem to step in and fill the gap. It's a role these companies already play. I'm guessing most small businesses just don't know about that option.
=====

Dear Paul:

Here's why SMB partners are not stepping up to the plate.

1.  The issue of who controls the client.  Office 365 does not allow the Partner to be in control of the Office 365 billing arrangement.  Clients sign up with Microsoft, Microsoft bills the client, Microsoft pays the partner a low partner fee.  The partner channel right now is seeing Microsoft as a competitor, not as a partner.  They see Microsoft as wanting to steal the clients or move them up the food chain to a Gold or Silver partner.

2.  The issue of the size of the client.  SBS Essentials max's out at 25 years.  You yourself ragged on Microsoft regarding this upper limit for which there is no solid migration path.  Most SMB partners thusly see Essentials as for really small clients, under 10.  And then in the MSP channel they are not sure that an under 10 user client is worth their time and values a MSP.

The partner ecosystem knows about Office 365.  The partner ecosystem is not too thrilled about Office 365.

What SBS Essentials needs is OTHER hosted email vendors to plug into it.  Other vendors that are seen as Partner channel friendly.  So far there's only been ONE vendor (www.exchangedefender.com ) that has built a plug in (as far as I'm aware).  Intermedia doesn't.  Others don't.

SBS Essentials needs more of an ecosystem is the real problem.

For another write up on the Office 365 plug in -- check out http://titlerequired.com/2011/11/30/sbs-2011-essentials-microsoft-office-365-integration/

Posted Tue, Jan 31 2012 21:46 by bradley | 2 comment(s)
Filed under:

On a SBS box activesync should -just-work-.

In case it doesn't - check this out

A script to troubleshoot issues with Exchange ActiveSync - Exchange Team Blog - Site Home - TechNet Blogs:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/01/31/a-script-to-troubleshoot-issues-with-exchange-activesync.aspx

Posted Tue, Jan 31 2012 21:05 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

Looking ahead to Windows 8: five big questions for Microsoft | ZDNet:
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/looking-ahead-to-windows-8-five-big-questions-for-microsoft/4446
"I suspect there’s a hard core of Windows fundamentalists who will never accept Metro style, or will resist it for some period of time. They’ll just have to deal with it, because I’m told the final release will not include a “classic” option with the Windows 7-style Start menu and search behavior."

Given that I still have a person in the office that uses the Classic menu option in Office 2010 I'm wincing a bit at this.  Heck I'm having issues finding my way around Windows server 8's new server manager, so I can only imagine what my users will be threatening me with if what I'm seeing in the Windows 8 developer preview ends up in the final version and the metro start menu is the only menu system.

If you want to check out Windows 8 - especially the upcoming consumer beta at the end of Feb and don't have a hyperV handy, use Oracle's virtualbox that runs it nicely. https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads

Fasten your seatbelt.  Lots of change ahead.

Posted Mon, Jan 30 2012 23:29 by bradley | 1 comment(s)
Filed under:

Due to the WSUS caused C34 errors with Windows 7 sp1 I had held back rolling out sp1 using any patch automated tools.  So I did it VERY inefficiently using Microsoft update and this weekend I was doing the last of the workstations that didn't have Windows 7 sp1 on them... including mine.

It worked for every single Windows 7 in my office... except....

mine.

Yes, mine.  I'm getting a lovely generic "generic error" that looks like I'm going to have to do a repair install.

ERROR E_FAIL (0X8004005) while installing Service Pack 1 for - Microsoft Answers:
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_other-windows_update/error-efail-0x8004005-while-installing-service/941795de-9c27-41ef-841e-0936b08913db

http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-windows_update/windows-7-sp1-error-code-80004005/61b906e0-2342-e011-90b6-1cc1de79d2e2

I'll try those recommended items, but I'm not holding my breath.

Posted Sun, Jan 29 2012 23:54 by bradley | 4 comment(s)
Filed under:

Looking for vendors building solutions on Windows Storage Server 2008 r2 Essentials?  First up is Western Digital's WD Sentinel DX4000:

http://wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=610

Support forum:
http://community.wdc.com/t5/WD-Sentinel-DX4000/bd-p/sentinel

More resources and information include:

WD Sentinel – Small Office NAS and Backup for SMB Clients:
http://www.sbsfaq.com/?p=3267
More Information on the WD Sentinel DX4000 - Using Windows Home Server:
http://usingwindowshomeserver.com/2011/11/15/western-digital-announces-the-release-of-the-wd-sentinel-dx4000-storage-server/
Western Digital Sentinel DX4000 Review | StorageReview.com - Storage Reviews:
http://www.storagereview.com/western_digital_sentinel_dx4000_review
New To The Charts: WD DX4000 Sentinel - SmallNetBuilder:
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/nas/nas-reviews/31628-new-to-the-charts-wd-dx4000-sentinel
Small Business NAS Review: WD Sentinel DX4000:
http://www.smallbusinesscomputing.com/ProductReviews/Storage/small-business-nas-review-wd-sentinel-dx4000.html
WD DX4000 Sentinel Mini Review:
http://www.mswhs.com/2012/01/wd-dx4000-sentinel-mini-review/
Six Minute and Six Second Review of the WD Sentinel DX4000 - Using Windows Home Server:
http://usingwindowshomeserver.com/2011/12/06/six-minute-and-six-second-review-of-the-wd-sentinel-dx4000/
Western Digital Intros Sentinel DX4000 Enterprise Storage Server - HotHardware:
http://hothardware.com/News/Western-Digital-Intros-Sentinel-DX4000-Enterprise-Storage-Server/
WD's Sentinel DX4000 Network Storage Servers for Businesses Debuts | WD,Sentinel DX4000,Network Storage Servers,Business,WD's Sentinel DX4000 Network Storage Servers for Businesses Debuts:
http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=16927&Itemid=47
New Western Digital Sentinel DX4000 NAS Brings Personal Clouds to Small Busines:
http://www.desktopreview.com/default.asp?newsID=1707&News=Western+Digital+Sentinel+DX4000+NAS+Windows+Storage+Server+2008+R2
Amazon.com: Western Digital 4 TB WD Sentinel DX4000 Small Office Storage Server: Electronics:
http://www.amazon.com/Western-Digital-Sentinel-DX4000-Storage/dp/B005INAKGI/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1327883150&sr=1-2

Posted Sun, Jan 29 2012 17:14 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

Security program support in Windows SBS 2011 Essentials environments:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2663776/en-us?sd=rss&spid=1167

Note You cannot install Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010 or Microsoft Security Essentials on a server that is running Windows SBS 2011 Essentials.

10 or fewer client computers

If your Windows SBS 2011 Essentials-based network has 10 or fewer client computers, we recommend that you install Microsoft Security Essentials on the client computers. Microsoft Security Essentials is a free download for up to 10 client computers, and it provides real-time protection against viruses, spyware, and other malicious software. For your Windows SBS 2011 server, we recommend that you install a third-party antivirus solution.

11 to 25 client computers

If your Windows SBS 2011 Essentials-based network has 11 to 25 client computers, we recommend that you install Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010 on the client computers. For your Windows SBS 2011 server, we recommend that you install a third-party antivirus solution.

We are currently researching how to support our security products in future releases of Windows SBS Essentials, and we will post more information in this article when it becomes available.

Error message when you try to install Exchange Server 2010 SP2: "AuthorizationManager check failed":
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2668686/en-us?sd=rss&spid=13965
Consider the following scenario:

  • You install Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 or Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 Service Pack 1 (SP1). (okay SBS 2011 includes Exchange 2010 sp1 - check)
  • You use the Group Policy Management Console (GPMC) or the Local Group Policy Editor (Gpedit.msc) to create a Group Policy Object (GPO) or a local policy . (We do have group policies - check)
  • The GPO or the local policy sets the Windows PowerShell Execution policy to a status other than Undefined. (SBS 2011 does NOT do this and thus will not be impacted by this)
  • You install Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 Service Pack 2 (SP2).

When this error occurs, Exchange Server 2010 does not work and is not listed in Add or Remove Programs. Additionally, you cannot reinstall Exchange Server 2010.

This issue occurs because the Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) service is stopped during the installation process. Therefore, the ServiceControl.ps1 Windows PowerShell script that runs as part of the Exchange Server 2010 SP2 installation process cannot call the WMI service to verify the execution permissions.

To resolve this issue, follow these steps:

  1. Recover the server that is running Exchange Server 2010

Ouch.  Bottom line, SBS is not impact.  But for anyone else out there installing SP2, you might want to check your PowerShell and ensure you have not set a policy.

Description of Update Rollup 6 for Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 3:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2608656/en-us?sd=rss&spid=10926
Microsoft has released Update Rollup 6 for Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 3 (SP3) that is dated January 25, 2012.


Released: Update Rollup 6 for Exchange 2007 Service Pack 3 - Exchange Team Blog - Site Home - TechNet Blogs:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/01/26/released-update-rollup-3-for-exchange-2007-service-pack-3.aspx

Earlier today the Exchange CXP team released Update Rollup 6 for Exchange Server 2007 SP3 to the Download Center.

Note: The post title erroneously referred to Update Rollup 3. It has been updated to reflect the correct rollup number.

This update contains a number of customer-reported and internally found issues since the release of RU5. See KB 2608656: Description of Update Rollup 6 for Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 3' for more details.

We would like to specifically call out the following fixes which are included in this release:

  • DST Cadence Release for Dec 2011 - Exchange 2007
  • 22656040 An Exchange Server 2007 Client Access server may respond slowly or stop responding when users try to synchronize the Exchange ActiveSync devices with their mailboxes
  • 2498852 "0x80041606" error message when you perform a prefix search by using Outlook in online mode in an Exchange Server 2007 environment
  • 22653334 The reseed process is unsuccessful on the SCR passive node when the circular logging feature is enabled in an Exchange Server 2007 environment
  • 22617784 Journal reports are expired or lost when the Microsoft Exchange Transport service is restarted in an Exchange Server 2007 environment
  • 2289607 The week numbers displayed in OWA do not match the week numbers displayed in Outlook for English users and French users in an Exchange Server 2007 environment

General Notes:

For DST Changes: http://www.microsoft.com/time.

Note for Forefront Protection for Exchange users For those of you running Forefront Protection for Exchange, be sure you perform these important steps from the command line in the Forefront directory before and after this rollup's installation process. Without these steps, Exchange services for Information Store and Transport will not start after you apply this update. Before installing the update, disable ForeFront by using this command: fscutility /disable. After installing the update, re-enable ForeFront by running fscutility /enable.

Posted Fri, Jan 27 2012 19:43 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

<please note, this isn't anti cloud, rather it's a plea to vendors to provide value for services>

For background, see this post

If you hired me and I did work for you for several years and then I came to you and said that I'd be bumping up the price by 1400% (that's not a typo) would you want me to justify that what you provided to me increased in value that much as well? 

You know what bugs me the most about putting key business assets lock stock and barrel inside of cloud deployments?  It's the problem that OpenDNS just showcased to me.  I'd better have an exit strategy that is relatively painless otherwise I'm going to be scrambling to exit should my cloud vendor jack up the price tag.  I'm guessing that OpenDNS's major shift in pricing is a sign that their venture capital firms want the free ride to go away.  That they want value as well for the dollars they are investing.  Fair enough.  Fair value for what they do.  But that's the thing, right now I have no idea of OpenDNS's business model.  I wanted to pay to ensure that the company stayed financially viable.  But I have no idea if $1500 per year is really what I cost to OpenDNS or if it's a means to get rid of small companies like mine.

It's the concerns I have regarding the pricing plans and options of offerings like Office 365.  Microsoft doesn't release the details of the financials behind Office 365 so I have no idea if the price per mailbox I'm seeing now truly is a reasonable fee for the product or if they are loss leading the prices to suck in customers.  Getting onto cloud services is relatively easy.  Getting off, perhaps not so easy.  In this case of OpenDNS, they are not sticky enough and hard enough to migrate off of, nor (in my opinion) provide $1500 of value to my firm that I can't find elsewhere for much cheaper amount.

But it's that "are you really making a decent living from what I am paying you or are you going to jack up the price tag once you no longer have your cash cows of Windows and Office to carry the load" that honestly concerns me because I have no means to make that decision based on the financials of Microsoft - and I'm a shareholder.

So all of you cloud vendors that want to get me on board as a smb customer?  Charge a reasonable price tag for your service up front.  Don't loss lead it.  Don't discount it so much to get customers that when you finally do increase the price tag for what it actually costs that you give your customers heart attacks. 

And ask yourself (if you are a big company), put yourself in my shoes of making decisions.  Would you pay what you are asking me to pay?  If you increased pricing, would you also consider this unreasonable?

I think even http://twitter.com/davidu would be shocked if he was paying $1500 for protecting just himself and no one else.

Posted Thu, Jan 26 2012 23:17 by bradley | 1 comment(s)
Filed under:

Recently during a migration someone found that public folder mail enabled routing was not working.  Turns out this was the problem:

When sending e-mail messages to a mail-enabled public folder that have been replicated from old Exchange Server 2000/2003/2007, Exchange Server 2010 environment mails are rejected with NDR.:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchangesvrgeneral/thread/e8e78736-be67-4e4a-b929-2c3ce61e0eb6

Also read this:

http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-TT/exchange2010/thread/49e06d4a-1b32-4067-999a-c85abd349c68

Posted Thu, Jan 26 2012 23:07 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

Drives are running out of free space (SharePoint Foundation 2010)

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff805057.aspx




Log Name: Application

Source: Microsoft-SharePoint Products-SharePoint Foundation

Date: 4/14/2011 12:00:02 PM

Event ID: 2138

Task Category: Health

Level: Warning

Keywords:

User: DOMAIN\spfarm

Computer: SERVER.DOMAIN.local

Description:

The SharePoint Health Analyzer detected a condition requiring your attention. Drives are at risk of running out of free space.

Available drive space is less than five times the value of physical memory. This is dangerous because it does not provide enough room for a full memory dump with continued operation. It also could cause problems with the Virtual Memory swap file: SBS 2011 (SERVER - C:\).

Examine the failing servers and delete old logs or free space on the drives. For more information about this rule, see http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=142688.

Resolution for SBSers:

The issue is you have a server with lots of physical ram.  SharePoint calculates this multiplys by 5 and expects that amount of free space on your C drive even though SharePoint is probably not on your C drive.

Go into the SharePont configuration.

Go into monitoring

Go into review rule definitions

Scroll down into the drives are running out of free space

Pull it up and edit it

Unclick the enabled box and save.

But Susan, don't we need to know when drives will run out of space?  There's already an alert that alerts you when your drives are less than 10% free.  You don't need another one.  And you certainly don't need one looking for five TIMES your RAM on your C drive where the SharePoint isn't even on.

But Susan, why can't this be fixed?  I bugged it, the SBS sustaining engineering team sees this as a 'by design' by the SharePoint team, and as such is not addressable in SBS's code and thus won't fix it.

SharePoint team considers everyone that runs SharePoint as admins that shouldn't be molly coddled by GUIs or something and deems that Admins should fix it themselves. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee663479.aspx

Bottom line, if you have lots of RAM, uncheck that box.

Posted Wed, Jan 25 2012 22:45 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

Missed my rant against OpenDNS, my presentation on Windows Storage Server 2008 r2 Essentials and WordPress?

You can catch it here:

Susan Bradley has invited you to view a Microsoft Office Live Meeting recording.
View Recording
Recording Details

    Subject: SMBTNFresno on WordPress/Storage Server Offerings
    Recording URL:
https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/winserver_usergroup/view
    Recording ID: 8ZQTN8
    Attendee Key: 8^-\zqX

Posted Wed, Jan 25 2012 21:47 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

I like what you offer.  I really do.  But you gave me a shock today.  One that I've seen with other subscription model vendors lately.

It's what happens when a subscription service changes the rules and the pricing and you have to then figure out if that service is really worth it and how hard it is to move off of it.

Today's example of that is Opendns.com.  I'm a fan.  Used it since it first came out.  Didn't just use the free service but as they inched the product up from the free service to a paid service went along for the ride.  It's only fair as I like to pay for things that give me value.  So when the ability to filter and block specific urls went out of the free product, into the deluxe and I had to pay $5 a year per user, I was cool with that.  So I get the notice that they are closing down the Deluxe plan and only offering Enterprise, I was cool with that.  Okay the price will go up a bit.  As long as it's reasonable price, I have no problem with it.

Until I heard how MUCH it was going up. 

Assuming I had 50 users in the office (which I don't, we're smaller than that) the pricing went from $5 a year to $30 a year for 50 people.  Their lowest OpenDNS enterprise plan is 1-50 users for $1,500.  Yes you read that right, $1,500 for their lowest sized plan.

Oh but Susan, you are now on the Enterprise plan which is so much more!  Dude, it's DNS forwarding with a extra web filtering.  A solid firewall can do the same in the web filtering department. 

But Susan it's phishing and botnet protection.  Dude, Exchange defender and a Calyptix box are of better value. 

But Susan we can offer you 500 domain black list.  Dude, block craigs list, ebay and facebook and that covers a lot right there.  I don't NEED 500 domain black lists.  I'm not sure I even KNOW 500 domains.

This where all of these subscription models hit the fan.  Everyone wants me on a monthly cash flow plan.  We're in a economy where you need to give value for me to pay you every month, month after month.  And if you increase your fees by THIS much? Dude, you'd better be increase the value to me by that much as well otherwise I'm going to look elsewhere.

It was nice using you, OpenDNS but what you just did in your pricing?  Wow.  This is not small business pricing for sure.  I can't put that much value to what you are bringing me.

It was nice knowing you, thanks for the ride, but I'm getting off now, thanks.

P.S.  Looks like you are removing filtering for free accounts as well as of 3/15  http://twitter.com/#!/mindflux/status/162326061152092160

Hi Susan,

Thanks for the time today and being a valued customer.  Per our discussion, the standard pricing for 1-50 employees is $1500/yr including support.  We can offer an upgrade discount of 30% and get the pricing down to $1000/yr ($83/month) including support.  You will not see an industry increase of more than 5-10% in the following years.  This discount will expire on 2/29/12.  Let me know if you can take advantage before then as your Deluxe will expire in April.  Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

I've included 2 video links, feature set, and data sheet for your review.

Enterprise Package
http://www.opendns.com/support/videos/enterprise

Bypass Blocked Pages Video
https://opendns.pbworks.com/w/page/27167062/Bypass-Blocked-Pages

Our Special Enterprise package will give you all the added features such as:

* Premium Content Filtering/Anti-Phishing Protection
* Malware Site Protection
* No More Ads!
* Enhanced Block Page Options (you can even host your own!)
* 500 Domain Black List/White List (or white list only!)
* Enhanced Stats&  Reporting
* Delegated Admin with Audit Log
* BLOCK PAGE BYPASS
* Enterprise SLA Support
* *** compliant! (schools)

Let me know if you would like to get set up, we can have you up and running same day.

Yesterday's letter:

Susan,

You should have received an email yesterday from our CEO, David Ulevitch, about upcoming changes to your OpenDNS account. I’m writing today to follow up on that email and let you know I am here to answer any questions you may have.

If you choose not to migrate to OpenDNS Enterprise when your current Deluxe subscription ends, you will continue to receive the same, best-in-class recursive DNS services for free without any usage limits, however filtering functionality will no longer be available.

If you would like to retain content filtering, you may upgrade to OpenDNS Enterprise. OpenDNS Enterprise includes everything that your Deluxe subscription has, as well as many more features, including:

  • Enhanced Botnet, Malware and Phishing protection
  • Unlimited number of networks
  • Unlimited access to stats and logs
  • Best in class customer support

For more information about OpenDNS Enterprise you can view our Datasheet here.

To make sure every Deluxe user who wants to take advantage of these additional features can do so, we are running a promotion for Deluxe users who elect to upgrade to OpenDNS Enterprise. This promotion is a limited time offer and will only be available to you until February 29, 2012.

If you are interested in receiving more information on upgrading to OpenDNS Enterprise, feel free to respond to this email directly

=======

Valued customer,

OpenDNS has provided services that make the Internet safer, faster and more reliable for five years and today has more than 30 million users around the world.  As a user of OpenDNS Deluxe and an early adopter, I deeply value the trust you've placed in us and hope you've found the service useful for filtering content on your network.

As our company continues its rapid growth, we're realigning our product family with an eye toward better fitting our customers' needs and goals.  We've decided to implement some changes that will impact your use of OpenDNS when your current subscription expires.

First and foremost, we've decided to discontinue support for OpenDNS Deluxe as we deepen our focus on providing world-class security for businesses through OpenDNS Enterprise.  After evaluating the benefits OpenDNS Deluxe offers to businesses and speaking to many customers, we concluded our efforts are better spent on improving OpenDNS Enterprise, which launched two years ago and now has more than 3,000 customers.  It includes significant additional functionality over Deluxe -- in particular, malware and botnet protection services, as well as block-page bypass functionality for more granular content filtering.  And don't let the name fool you; while we are proud to have some of the largest companies in the world using OpenDNS, our business offering is competitively priced for organizations of all sizes.

We recognize that some of the previously intended functionality was not added to OpenDNS Deluxe, and we recognize that for some of you, it was that intended functionality that drew you to OpenDNS Deluxe in the first place.  Our aim is to do right by all of our customers, so we're offering all OpenDNS Deluxe subscribers a discount over our published rates on OpenDNS Enterprise.  If you choose not to migrate to OpenDNS Enterprise, you will continue to receive the same, best-in-class recursive DNS services for free without any usage limits, but all filtering functionality will be disabled at the end of your current OpenDNS Deluxe subscription.

Your account manager will be following up with you over the next couple days to discuss the changes, and address any questions you may have.  If you would like to speak to your account manager right away, you can contact them directly at the address and number below.  Or if you have questions about your OpenDNS Deluxe subscription, simply reply to this email and we'll follow up promptly.

Best,

David Ulevitch
CEO, OpenDNS

Posted Wed, Jan 25 2012 17:09 by bradley | 7 comment(s)
Filed under:

So far the only Exchange 2010 sp2 official post known issue I've seen is this:

Event ID 4999 is logged on an Exchange Server 2010 Client Access server (CAS):
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2665115/en-us?sd=rss&spid=13965

I've seen a few folks report a bit of bumpiness getting it installed on SBS 2011 but I've not see any abilty to repro this issue.  Like anything, have a backup before you plan to roll it out.

Join us for a SMBTN Fresno meeting about WordPress and the latest news in Windows Storage Server 2008 R2 Essentials

When: Wednesday, Jan 25, 2012 6:30 PM (PST)
Scheduled to Occur: Once
Duration: 2:00

Susan Bradley has invited you to attend an online meeting using
Microsoft Office Live Meeting.

https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/winserver_usergroup/join?id=8ZQTN8&role=attend&pw=8%5E-%5CzqX

Meeting time: Jan 25, 2012 6:30 PM (PST) 

Add to my Outlook Calendar:
https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/winserver_usergroup/meetingICS?id=8ZQTN8&role=attend&pw=8%5E-%5CzqX&i=i.ics

AUDIO INFORMATION
-Computer Audio(Recommended)
To use computer audio, you need speakers and microphone, or a
headset.


FIRST-TIME USERS
To save time before the meeting, check your system to make sure it is
ready to use Microsoft Office Live Meeting.
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=90703

TROUBLESHOOTING
Unable to join the meeting? Follow these steps:
  1. Copy this address and paste it into your web browser:
     https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/winserver_usergroup/join
  2. Copy and paste the required information:
        Meeting ID: 8ZQTN8
        Entry Code: 8^-\zqX
        Location: https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/winserver_usergroup
If you still cannot enter the meeting, contact support:
http://r.office.microsoft.com/r/rlidLiveMeeting?p1=12&p2=en_US&p3=LMInfo&p4=support

NOTICE
Microsoft Office Live Meeting can be used to record meetings.
By participating in this meeting, you agree that your communications
may be monitored or recorded at any time during the meeting.

Posted Mon, Jan 23 2012 20:30 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

So you migrated from SBS 2003 to SBS 2011 and one of the steps in the migration is to remove any unnecessary security groups... but which ones?

First compare the default security groups as laid down by a default clean install of SBS 2011:

Now compare them to the security groups you get on a migrated server

Mind you I added a few extra for older applications that needed some special registry edits.

Notice how all the new groups now have "Windows SBS" in front?

Can you get rid of all of those legacy groups?  Well, did you make any special group policies with them?  Take a backup of the server first and then start pruning down to just those security groups you need....which is probably all of the new ones, and then any security group you specifically added.

Posted Sun, Jan 22 2012 0:33 by bradley | 1 comment(s)
Filed under:

Join us at https://www.facebook.com/BackupEssential and http://www.twitter.com/backupessential to keep track of those vendors that are building solutions around Windows Storage Server 2008 R2 Essentials vendors. Each week we'll be focusing on a vendor that is building solutions that you can use to backup workstations.

Windows Storage Server 2008 R2 Essentials is the client backup of Home Server 2011 with data dedup that is allowed to join a domain!

Like/friend/follow the facebook and twitter accounts to find out all the vendors that are building solutions around Windows Storage Server 2008 R2 Essentials

Essentials KB
An error occurs when you try to set up Microsoft Office 365 Integration on Windows SBS 2011 Essentials:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2666023/en-us?sd=rss&spid=1167

SBS Standard KBs

Unable to run the migration preparation tool on SBS server:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2652240/en-us?sd=rss&spid=1167

Windows Server Backup May fail the Exchange Consistency Check:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2616952/en-us?sd=rss&spid=1167

Posted Fri, Jan 20 2012 22:29 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

Saw this comment on the blog

http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2012/01/16/managing-event-alerts-in-your-reports-an-sbs-monitoring-feature-enhancement.aspx

"OK, now the 64k question.... WHICH alerts are you actually EXCLUDING and WHY?"

And I was thinkin' that this person may not be running SBS 2011 currently to know why these alerts are annoying.

As was posted in the comments on the blog, all of these alerts are referred to in KB2483007:

Windows SBS 2011 Standard Known Post Installation Event Log Errors and Warnings:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2483007/en-us?sd=rss&spid=1167

This lists all the stuff that you are supposed to ignore, but can't because they end up in your error reports and daily emails and look pretty nasty to show to clients.

If you have a SBS 2011 -- are there other alerts you've seen that are not flagged by that default set?  What are they?  Post 'em up!

Posted Thu, Jan 19 2012 23:34 by bradley | 5 comment(s)
Filed under:

So here you are on the SBS diva blog thinking I know everything there is about SBS from standard to premium to essentials.  And I'm here to tell you I don't.  Especially not about essentials.  There's another blog that you should add to your rss reader if you are starting to poke around SBS Essentials

http://titlerequired.com/2012/01/16/introducing-the-microsoft-sbs-2011-essentials-answer-file-tool/  And in fact it starts off with a gui way to edit the config file you need to join Essentials to an existing domain for migration purposes.

Bottom line, I run SBS with Exchange and Windows Storage Server 2008 R2 Essentials.  For the REAL SBS Essentials guru, check out Robert's blog.

Posted Wed, Jan 18 2012 23:15 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:
More Posts Next page »