[There's a reason that Yoda is the unofficial mascot of SBS.  Size indeed matters not.] February 2011 - Posts - THE OFFICIAL BLOG OF THE SBS DIVA

February 2011 - Posts

How to Migrate Companyweb to a SQL 2008 R2 Standard Instance on SBS 2011: Part 1 - The Official SBS Blog - Site Home - TechNet Blogs: http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2011/02/28/how-to-migrate-companyweb-to-a-sql-2008-r2-standard-instance-on-sbs-2011-part-1.aspx

When you move your Companyweb off the DC and onto the secondary server it also opens it up to support Office Web Apps.  Remember you can't run Office Web Apps on a domain controller (and SBS is a DC) so we're kinda stuck on support of Office Web Apps on the SBS 2011 standard.  BUT, you can put it on a SharePoint that's on the second server.

That's part one, grab the popcorn and wait for the next parts.

Posted Mon, Feb 28 2011 21:43 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/microsofts-new-answers-site-stumbles/8800

While the normal IT pro shouldn't need to hang out over on the Microsoft answers forum, you may be surprised how the ecosystem of the Microsoft answers forum has actually helped you on the ITpro side.  In particular the 'dead bodies' of the Windows update forum primarily came from the "VistaWU" forum over on the old Answers 1.0 platform.  While the forum was called VistaWU, it really was all of the Windows update issues.  Many a time an issue that impacted patching in the IT pro community was also seen in this VistaWU forum.  And in fact typically earlier than the ITpro side as the consumer patching community tends to update as soon as updates come out (which is why they are installing Windows 7 sp1 as soon as it hit the Windows update window).

So this weekend the Microsoft Answers forum flipped over to the 2.0 version. 

http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us

And so far the motto of the site should be "Real People.  Real Frustrated."  Granted anytime someone makes a major change there is a 'who moved my cheese" moment.  Humans don't take to change easily.  In the defense of the site, it's had a rough debut.  The performance over the last few days has been worse than the worst performance I've seen in a web site...ever... and this blog site has been pretty sucky.  Time outs on the page.  Sometimes fast, sometimes horrifically slow.  It's been a nightmare of a rollout.

But I'll be blunt tonight and say that it's also not done a good job ensuring that answerers have the best tools they can for tracking and answer to questions on the site.  So far I've found that instead of clicking on a thread that if you open the thread in a new window means you can more easily go back to the forum view you want to have.

Keep in mind there's no "Product forum" per se, it's all based on filtered views.  If you wanted to get a view of Windows update posts with zero replies, you need to build that view and either bookmark it or click on the RSS feed icon and pull it into your RSS reader.  Yesterday the RSS feed wasn't working because the performance was so bad, today at least it's responding better.

So if the forum gods are smiling, either the bookmarked view or the RSS feed works and you can get to the filtered view you want.  If you see a subject line you might want to answer, don't forget to open the question in a new tab.  If you do not, you'll either need to go back-back-back to the view you want, or start over again on the bookmarked page.  Once you post your answer, if you want to make sure you get an alert when the original poster has come back to follow up with more info, if you are not a moderator for that particular forum, you need to click on "me too" button to subscribe you to the thread.  Mind you, I'm not sure I like this practice as I don' t think it gives valid forum counts of issues, but so far that's the best workaround.  Also make sure you copy your answer before you hit the submit button in case you hit the site as it's having performance issues.

Bottom line, patience is not only a virtue but required if Microsoft Answers was a place you answered questions in.

So I'm interested...what forums or Q&A venues do you hang out in?

Posted Mon, Feb 28 2011 19:12 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

Hello Susan,


Thank you for your e-mail regarding the Microsoft Action Pack Subscription.

Due to system limitations we are experiencing delays posting Windows SBS 2011 Download and Key. We will soon have this issue fixed, in the mean time you can access Windows SBS 2011 and key from your TechNet subscription that came with your Action Pack for Solution Providers until it is available on the Digital Download page.

To access your TechNet Subscription go to:

1. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/subscriptions/default.aspx?lc=1033

2. Click on activate my subscription and sign in

3. Complete 4 required fields (First Name, Last Name, Email, and Subscriber ID/Technical ID)

Your Subscriber ID/Technical ID# is XXXX

Ugh.  Still no SBS 2011 on the action pack download.  The good news is you can at least run the Technet version for testing in the meantime, but the site that was supposed to be able to release software faster... isn't.

Stay tuned.

Posted Mon, Feb 28 2011 12:03 by bradley | 8 comment(s)
Filed under:

SBS2011 Ready To GO (RTG) Campaign is Live - Welcome to the US SMB&D TS2 Team Blog - Site Home - TechNet Blogs:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/uspartner_ts2team/archive/2011/02/26/sbs2011-ready-to-go-rtg-campaign-is-live.aspx

Looking for customizable info?  Check out that page.

Posted Sun, Feb 27 2011 21:30 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

https://www.microsoft.com/msppdd/Catalog/CatalogView.aspx

For anyone keeping score today.... we still do not see the SBS 2011 media on the Action pack download site. 

According to my calendar there's one day left in February.  It was estimated that it would be there by the end of Februrary.  If anyone spots it up there, holler.

...now why it takes so long to get up there... and why it hasn't been there before this... and why the key code couldn't have been up there by now... sorry, can't answer that.  let's just hope it's finally there tomorrow.

Posted Sun, Feb 27 2011 19:35 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

Log Name:      System
Source:        Microsoft-Windows-HAL
Date:          2/27/2011 12:37:19 AM
Event ID:      12
Task Category: None
Level:         Error
Keywords:      (1)
User:          N/A
Computer:      KIKIVISTA
Description:
The platform firmware has corrupted memory across the previous system power transition.  Please check for updated firmware for your system.
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
  <System>
    <Provider Name="Microsoft-Windows-HAL" Guid="{63D1E632-95CC-4443-9312-AF927761D52A}" />
    <EventID>12</EventID>
    <Version>0</Version>
    <Level>2</Level>
    <Task>0</Task>
    <Opcode>0</Opcode>
    <Keywords>0x8000000000000001</Keywords>
    <TimeCreated SystemTime="2011-02-27T08:37:19.753989600Z" />
    <EventRecordID>1363989</EventRecordID>
    <Correlation />
    <Execution ProcessID="4" ThreadID="6040" />
    <Channel>System</Channel>
    <Computer>KIKIVISTA</Computer>
    <Security />
  </System>
  <EventData>
    <Data Name="Count">1</Data>
    <Data Name="FirstPage">63</Data>
    <Data Name="LastPage">63</Data>
  </EventData>
</Event>

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2028443

http://download.microsoft.com/download/7/E/7/7E7662CF-CBEA-470B-A97E-CE7CE0D98DC2/mem-corrupt.docx

ick..that's not good... message on my Sister's laptop.  Now looking for a firmware update.

Posted Sun, Feb 27 2011 18:49 by bradley | 1 comment(s)
Filed under:

If you are reading this blog you are over on the Community Server side of the fence.  Don't worry this blog isn't going anywhere.. not soon anyway mainly because I've put way too many posts and way too many images up here.  But looking forward I know that long term wise for a site that is a volunteer based, no revenue stream, beholden on the kindness of Vlad from www.ownwebnow.com Community server wasn't good for a community based site.  Several years ago the licensing changed, and the means of how Community Server/Telligent folks got their revenue (business, not from people not paying anything) made it clear that the community surrounding Community server was drying up.  Finding new themes was impossible.  Getting updates was expensive.  So I started looking around at other platforms.  Knowing that WordPress was the "community standard" of a ton of themes, plug ins, and features meant that it was hands down the one to go with.  However migrating to it was another problem all unto itself.

First I was trying to stay with the Windows/SQL stack rather than going down the Linux stack.  As Alun put it best, a Linux box in the hands of someone who doesn't know what they are doing is not a secure system.  Conversely choosing Windows came with it's own issues.  Because initially I wanted to stay with SQL server and not MYSQL, I found initially a solution.  But one that it soon became obvious wasn't a solution but a security problem. 

Let me explain.  I found a site where Wordpress on SQL server had been ported over.  Hooray thought I.  The SQL that I'm familar with.  Windows I know how to secure combined with Wordpress.  One problem.  It became obvious that this project appears to be one that hasn't been funded lately or at least not getting any more current love.  The current download from the site is a Wordpress 2.9 version.  Not good from a security standpoint.  And based on the posts on this old thread, I didn't see an update in the future.  The post may say "we plan on releasing the patch for WP 3.0 + PDO support officially here shortly (hopefully this week)" but this event never occurred.  Merely plopping version 3 over the top didn't work as obviously Wordpress is built for MySQL and not SQL so the DLLs need to be adjusted.  Not something that I can do, nor something that honestly I wanted to fund myself personally. 

Certainly I was debating hiring the firm that did the custom porting to convert WordPress 3.1 to work on SQL and asking them to release it to the public or something, but the redo of the release candidate of WordPress 3.1 and the continuing releases of security patches for WordPress 3.x series made me get realistic.  I'd be funding the porting of WordPress to SQL out of my pocket every time WordPress came out with an update.  Which could be quite often.

So ...what to do?  Fortunately around that time the Webmatrix platform came out (and possibly could be a reason for the delay in the WordPress on SQL project.  http://www.microsoft.com/web/webmatrix/  Using this tool it was trivial to download WordPress, get the MySQL installed and set up another blog site.  To set up a multi user site was a matter of putting a line in the wp-config.php: define('WP_ALLOW_MULTISITE', true);
 as documented from here:   http://codex.wordpress.org/Create_A_Network  Once you put that in the wizard opens up to enter in how you are going to do a multi user site, and then gives you the web.config file you need for the site.

Now what about migrating the content?  This is where I should have never figured out how to add images to my blog and never have blogged so much.  Inside Community server we inserted the BlogML export tool. http://nayyeri.net/community-server-2007-blogml-converter The hardest part is once it's installed is finding where in the blog it's stuck it.  It's in the configuration section.  Now you go there and export out the contents of the blog.

Now comes the fun part.  If you have spam comments, they will make this export barf.  If you've blogged a lot, it may be a large file.  You may need to edit the upload limits on the WordPress blog site AND.. (and here comes the painful part) may need to cut down your blog into pieces to get the blog content from Community Server over to WordPress.  Given also how Community server places the image files, it may end up that you get broken images. 

Now you go over to WordPress and there's a BlogML import tool. 

Now you know why I've made the decision to run BOTH the community server side of the blogs (http://www.msmvps.com ) as well as the WordPress side (http://blogs.msmvps.com ) concurrently.  The web site is on a much beefier box and can handle it better than where it was.

Working with WordPress I've come to realize the issues with that platform as well as the challenges we ALL are going to be facing as we move to the cloud. 

Firstly data portability.  When you decide to move to a web based/cloud platform investigate the way in as well as the way out.  Data portability is a HUGE problem in our future as I see it.

Content of code.  While WordPress has vastly more plug ins and abilities, it also should give one pause that there's a ton of web sites out there with possibly out of date software, out of date plug ins, and written by people that no one has vetted for secure software handling. 

Bottom line is moving from Community Server to WordPress doable?  Painful yes but doable.  Can you run a multi user Wordpress site?  Yes.  There's certainly features and plug ins that support this.  Does it mean that you'll soon be seeing www.sbsdiva.com on a new community server site?  Probably not in the very near future and maybe not longer than that.  I blogged too much and stuck way too many images to make for a nice easy transition.  Bottom line I'm too legacy to move and will be sticking on the Community server side.

 

Posted Sat, Feb 26 2011 20:22 by bradley | 9 comment(s)
Filed under:

Note the massive amounts of snowfall in Fresno this morning...

Obviously predicting weather around here is rough....

..in Fresno no less

Posted Sat, Feb 26 2011 0:40 by bradley | 1 comment(s)
Filed under:

So I'm using the Webmatrix tool to install a blogging site on this server tonight.  I already tried it on a practice server...

http://www.microsoft.com/web/webmatrix/

it walks you through what you need to set up a site and get it easily going.  Too bad they don't have one for SharePoint and Office web apps though as it's easy to set up a site with it for sure.

Check it out.

Posted Fri, Feb 25 2011 21:44 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mssmallbiz/archive/2011/01/18/how-and-where-to-download-microsoft-windows-small-business-server-2011-as-a-microsoft-partner.aspx

  • Please note: product keys [for SBS 2011] distributed through the MSDN and TechNet are single activation keys. As a Microsoft partner, you can obtain your Multiple Activation Key (MAK) product key [for SBS 2011] from the Microsoft partner digital distribution portal in late February.

https://www.microsoft.com/msppdd/Catalog/CatalogView.aspx

So I'm checking again tonight on the Action pack download page and still no SBS 2011 keycodes...but... interestingly enough.. Win7 with sp1 is up there only a week after releasing to Technet.

Interesting.  I was giving them the benefit of the doubt that it took time for processing for these media things, but Windows 7 got up there very quickly.

"Late" February only has two business days left folks, let's hope it's the SBS 2011 keys are up there no later than Monday.

Well the good news is that Win7 with sp1 included is up on the Action pack for download.  Let's hope that SBS 2011's keycodes will be up there soon as well.

"Quicker access. Download updates the moment they’re made available—no need to wait for a quarterly shipment of software."
Obviously "available" must  have a broader meaning than we thought :-)
Posted Thu, Feb 24 2011 23:49 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

So if you have a SBS 2011 and you go to http://remote.domain.com/exchange it doesn't work.

Why?

Exchange 2010-ness.

The Internet Address Management Wizard changes the OWA URL from https://<YourNetworkDomainName>/exchange to https://<YourNetworkDomainName>/owa, and the Source Server can no longer serve requests to https://<YourNetworkDomainName>/exchange. We recommend that you notify your users before this change occurs and that you finish the steps in Move Exchange Server mailboxes and settings for Windows SBS 2011 Standard migration as soon as possible.

Posted Thu, Feb 24 2011 23:23 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:


...to gain that additional dynamic memory for your SBS 2011 standard or SBS 2011 essentials?

Log Name:      System
Source:        dmvsc
Date:          2/23/2011 8:47:26 PM
Event ID:      2
Task Category: None
Level:         Error
Keywords:      Classic
User:          N/A
Computer:      SERVER.AURORATEST.local
Description:
The Dynamic Memory driver failed because dynamic memory is not supported on this  release of Windows.

That's from a SBS 2011 Essentials box.



That's from a SBS 2011 Standard box.


So to be honest I'm not sold on this letting server share memory in the first place.  It just sounds like an accident waiting to happen. 
In the case of SBS 2011 it has Exchange on there that loves to take all the RAM given to it and then release it as needed. 

Exchange Server Memory Requirements and Recommendations

Some hypervisors have the ability to oversubscribe or dynamically adjust the amount of memory available to a specific guest machine based on the perceived utilization of memory in the guest machine as compared to the needs of other guest machines managed by the same hypervisor. This technology makes sense for workloads in which memory is needed for brief periods of time and then can be surrendered for other uses. However, it doesn't make sense for workloads that are designed to use memory on an ongoing basis. Exchange, like many server applications with optimizations for performance that involve caching of data in memory, is susceptible to poor system performance and an unacceptable client experience if it doesn't have full control over the memory allocated to the physical or virtual machine on which it is running. Many of the performance gains in recent versions of Exchange, especially those related to reduction in I/O, are based on highly efficient usage of large amounts of memory. When that memory is no longer available, the expected performance of the system can't be achieved. For this reason, memory oversubscription or dynamic adjustment of virtual machine memory should be disabled for production Exchange servers.Memory should be sized for guest machines using the same methods as physical deployments. You can find details about memory sizing for Exchange 2010 server roles in Understanding Memory Configurations and Exchange Performance. For additional guidance, see the “Application Considerations” section of a white paper written by the Microsoft Hyper-V team, available for download at Implementing and Configuring Dynamic Memory.

From http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996719.aspx

Translation.... Exchange is a jealous beast and wants all the toys to itself.  So hyperV and dynamic memory and SBS?  Ain't gonna see it.  SQL?  Only with the higher up editions of enterprise and datacenter.

Posted Wed, Feb 23 2011 21:11 by bradley | 3 comment(s)
Filed under:

Updated migration docs on the download site tonight

Download details: Migrate to Windows Small Business Server 2011 Standard from Windows Small Business Server 2008:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=cc2c9081-6ffc-4c8b-80e9-c15fc7ad2585&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+MicrosoftDownloadCenter+%28Microsoft+Download+Center%29#tm

Download details: Migrate Windows Small Business Server 2011 Standard to New Hardware:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=05ed8e74-55e9-4eb1-8ab7-ff074c5c7adf&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+MicrosoftDownloadCenter+%28Microsoft+Download+Center%29#tm

and

Download details: Windows Server Solutions Best Practices Analyzer 1.0:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=d40dcc5b-8f97-49e2-ae79-9c7a7a69dec4&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+MicrosoftDownloadCenter+%28Microsoft+Download+Center%29#tm

Posted Wed, Feb 23 2011 20:44 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

In the www.sbsforum.info tonight is this question:

I just completed migrating a customer from Small Business Server 2003 to SBS 2011, which is x64.

Now a legacy program called Trane Acoustics (TAP) won't show shared folders whose length is longer than 8 characters.  Customer says TAP showed folders / files with names longer than 8 chars (including spaces and some special characters, even) prior to the migration. 

I have fooled with some permission changes to no avail.

Is there anything else I should try?  Is the 64-bit OS a possible culprit?

Thanks,

And I remembered this chesnut -- hopefully it does the trick but FYI in case it helps anyone else...

http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2009/02/26/old-8-3-file-names-are-still-kicking-in-the-2008-era.aspx

 note from Tony:Some information for your after using yor blogs for years for help and assistnace...

If you happen to have old DOS / Netware applications that use data off  a network share... yes they are still out there.... and work in vista....

By default SBS 2008 has 8dot3 filenames turned off and these old applications will not work..

run cmd as Administrator

fsutil behavior query disable8dot3   ( result of 1 is on  o is off )

fsutil behsvior set disable8dot3 0

REboot required.... but to reset the filenames the data has to be copied off the server, deleted and copied back...file by file...

robocopy to the rescue again...

Thanks for your Help
Regards
Tony

 

 

Posted Wed, Feb 23 2011 20:12 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

Windows MultiPoint Server 2011 and Interaction with Small Business Server 2011 Essentials - The Official SBS Blog - Site Home - TechNet Blogs:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2011/02/23/windows-multipoint-server-2011-and-interaction-with-small-business-server-2011-essentials.aspx

So why might you want to take a look at MultiPoint server?

Ever had a need for having multiple users in a Quickbooks?  Uh huh.  Thought so.  Now officially speaking only the Quickbooks Enterprise version is supported on Terminal Server (aka Remote Desktop Services these days), but Quickbooks non enterprise version will work in Terminal Server.  Versions prior to QB 2011 -- the pdf writer isn't fond of x64bitness - so use CutePDF instead. 

But honestly, when's the last time you called Intuit for support? 

Disable IE ESC inside the server manager and there you go.  Turnkey Terminal Server in a box.

Official twitter-er here: http://twitter.com/MSMultiPoint

Posted Wed, Feb 23 2011 19:40 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

Download details: Migrate to Windows Small Business Server 2011 Standard from Windows Small Business Server 2003:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=ea184914-6445-4d7a-a432-927e6880dcd0

Published: February 2011

Version: 11.02.23

Changes include:

Page 6 - expanded terms and definitions - now talks about primary and second server.

Page 15 - Removed a section that talked about migrating from SBS 2008 and downloading a prep tool.

Page 23 - Moved the guidance about migrating a custom DHCP scope (including static IPs) from your source server to your destination server.

Page 30 - Moved the guidance about the migration of DHCP from here.

Page 34 - Discusses optimizing network infrastructure to reduce time to migrate mailboxes to 1.0 GBPS network connections.

Page 58 - Title fixed up.

Page 69 - Removed reference to nextref_sbs.

 

Items that are still needed (in my opinion)

Page 37 - Info on how to speed up replication on public folders

Page 39 - In the section on skip the corrupted messages, recommend that the value of skipped messages needs to be less than 50 otherwise you'll have to do it via PowerShell.

Page 42 - Needs to note that when you are told to delete out the Small Business Server Update services Computer policy, Common Settings policy and Server computer policy, you will only see these if you migrate from SBS 2003 R2.  If you never installed the R2, you didn't have these WSUS policies.  The new WSUS policies installed by SBS 2011 look really close and it's just a little bit confusing.

Posted Wed, Feb 23 2011 18:55 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

So the jury is still out on dynamic memory and SBS 2011.

dynamic memory and Exchange or SQL:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserverhyperv/thread/97689834-5657-4c87-b520-31c994bf825f

"Great question. We're working with these teams to have guidelines on configuring Dynamic Memory for these workloads.

SQL Server announced full support for Dynamic Memory (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/956893). We'll start having blog posts about the initial guidelines in the blog posts pointed by above link and eventually publish a whitepaper around it. Important thing is to set Memory Buffer = 5% for SQL workloads.

Exchange Server is a little bit different. Mailbox Role in Exchange Server does not change its memory allocations on the fly. So Dynamic Memory will not provide many benefits for this role. Other roles of Exchange can run with Dynamic Memory without any special configuration.

Thanks,


Serdar Sutay [MSFT]
Program Manager, Hyper-V "

Bottom line in our unscientific testing... that SBS 2011 doesn't budge.

Posted Wed, Feb 23 2011 0:16 by bradley | 1 comment(s)
Filed under:

Looking for customizable brochures?

http://oem.microsoft.com/downloads/public/worldwide/sbs_2011/SBS_2011_Family_ToCustomer_Brochure_native_files.zip

Windows Small Business Server 2011 Standard Sell It:
http://www.microsoft.com/oem/en/products/servers/Pages/windows_sbs_2011_standard_sell.aspx

Check out the other selling documenation there.

Posted Tue, Feb 22 2011 21:49 by bradley | with no comments
Filed under:

Download details: Microsoft Windows Small Business Server 2011 Best Practices Analyzer:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=bbf35af9-f1ee-4397-b544-af3f31d7e32f&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+MicrosoftDownloadCenter+%28Microsoft+Download+Center%29#tm

The BPA is no longer MIA.  If you downloaded and installed the prior one you need to uninstall it, then install this one.

Note to self, next time download and check before you blog.  It's the old BPA back.

More Posts Next page »