Monday, May 26, 2008 5:44 PM
bradley
Should Exchange be free?
http://www.arlingtondev.com/thoughts/?p=38
Interesting post. Should Microsoft make hosted Exchange free so that it keeps people "tied to Microsoft". Or should Microsoft provide a cloud filtering service to ensure that small businesses aren't ripping out Exchange?
Spam is winning, make no mistake, and it's still my strong opinion that one should not, nor cannot these days deploy a mail server without an edge filtering device of some kind. (I use Exchange Defender at the office)
But should everything that a business depends on be free? Remember the old adage.... Nothing in life is free and we all pay for it in the long run.
"Report it to your insurance, it's free"= higher insurance costs
"They overcharge us anyway, they won't miss one"= average loss rate in retail
If we depend on email, if our business relies on it, should we have it as free? Can a company monetize support services if they give something away? I just have a hard time having as a business asset a free service that gives me no reliance that it will remain with the same service. Long term wise, no company can give away service or product without some long term monetary strategy.
Conversely, I'd argue that email is not as dependable as we think it is. It's certainly not secure (can be sniffed if not protected), and unless we all turn on return receipts (which are annoying), you cannot, nor should not expect that it's reliable unless you call and follow up and confirm that it got there.
Filed under: Exchange