http://msmvps.com/blogs/bill/archive/2005/09/11/66116.aspxHow do you deal with this ? Obviously if the application is run under the limited user's account it can't update shared files in the program files. As a consumer who runs as a limited user I came across this annoyance when using new software from oneenCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)http://msmvps.com/blogs/bill/archive/2005/09/11/66116.aspx#68502Sun, 02 Oct 2005 16:00:00 GMTd67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:68502billJust saw this. I'm afraid you're right, (4) is the only decent option. Which I hate, since it likely means that over time systems will be cluttered with services (which mine already are, by far). <br> <br>Other comments: <br>(1) Could cause a lot of duplication as well, if you used multiple applications from the bank. But this makes me wonder... Is what they are putting in the shared directory really something that should be shared? Are you using multiple bank applications? <br>(2) You're right. I don't think I'd even consider this option, since it adds a layer of complexity to the app that I doubt is justified. <br>(3) No!!!! <br> <br>Maybe this calls for a shared service that an app could enroll in for updates? InstallShield has something that sounds like this, but I don't know enough about it to know if it's a feasible option.<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=68502" width="1" height="1">http://msmvps.com/blogs/bill/archive/2005/09/11/66116.aspx#68504Sat, 01 Oct 2005 22:04:00 GMTd67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:68504TrackBackBill McCarthy poses an interesting question about software updates and limited users. The gist is, where...<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=68504" width="1" height="1">