<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>VB on the up !</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bill/archive/2008/04/18/vb-on-the-up.aspx</link><description>Latest TOIBE analysis shows VB on the up ! VB 11.7 %, C# 3.8%</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: VB on the up !</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bill/archive/2008/04/18/vb-on-the-up.aspx#1608244</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:32:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1608244</guid><dc:creator>bill</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Brian, yeh I can see you&amp;#39;re obviously still sick &amp;lt;g&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The graph is actually kind of useless when it comes to comparing languages due to the poor methodology. &amp;nbsp;What it is useful for is looking at trends: as in if any language is on the up or decline.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reason it&amp;#39;s flawed is they search for various keywords for some languages, like you obviously need to for VB, Visual Basic etc. &amp;nbsp;They then take the highest out of them, *NOT* the sum. &amp;nbsp;Neither is correct of coure, they really need to take the mutual exclusive sum.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And, on a quick google search, there clearly are terms for some languages that they aren&amp;#39;t using, that provide higher hits than the ones they are using. &amp;nbsp;So language like Java, where there&amp;#39;s little use of other phrases, and even J2EE pages typically include the term Java, appear vastly more popular to other languages. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So it really is more &amp;quot;what&amp;#39;s in a name ?&amp;quot; ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1608244" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: VB on the up !</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bill/archive/2008/04/18/vb-on-the-up.aspx#1608230</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:15:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1608230</guid><dc:creator>Brian Madsen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Obviously there's a lot of people out there who's only capable of reading psuedo code :p&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think RunAsRadio or was it DNR that had a show not too long ago about VB and the uptake..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;it would however be better to see which of the languages are .Net based? and i cannot believe that PHP and Perl is rated in the same class as the other ones..they're scripting languages...like jscript and vbscript :) oh, and i hate those too...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i'm sure you expected me to troll in here sooner or later Bill :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1608230" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: VB on the up !</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bill/archive/2008/04/18/vb-on-the-up.aspx#1604250</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:35:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1604250</guid><dc:creator>Patrick Wood</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am glad to see that VB is doing well. &amp;nbsp;It is also interesting to note that the top 3 languages are declining. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1604250" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: VB on the up !</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bill/archive/2008/04/18/vb-on-the-up.aspx#1597712</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:31:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1597712</guid><dc:creator>Robert Blair</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Bill,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A few different ways of reading their results:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(a) (the obvious) VB is still more popular than C#&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(b) Dot Net languages (VB &amp;amp; C#) are actually number 2. But I think maybe a goodly proportion of the VB percentage is VB Classic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(c) C-based languages (C &amp;amp; C++) are actually number 1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1597712" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>