<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msmvps.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Auto properties : What ifs ...</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bill/archive/2008/03/28/auto-properties-what-ifs.aspx</link><description>Paul Vick posted a speculative post as to Automatically Implemented properties for VB10. Although it&amp;#39;s kind of nice, it really is just a minor modification from what C# did in 3.0 and misses a lot of the &amp;quot;what if&amp;quot; scenarios we should be</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: Auto properties : What ifs ...</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bill/archive/2008/03/28/auto-properties-what-ifs.aspx#1562925</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:51:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1562925</guid><dc:creator>bill</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Nick,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well we might have to agree to disagree then ;) &amp;nbsp;The C# iplementation simply wouldn't work in VB, especially such as having a mixed accessibility (private set, public get etc).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also think the C# implementation is okay only for writing code the first time, but as soon as you want to modify anything it needs a refactoringn tool. &amp;nbsp;I expect as time goes on that is the exact complaint we'll see more and more of from C# folks .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1562925" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Auto properties : What ifs ...</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bill/archive/2008/03/28/auto-properties-what-ifs.aspx#1562745</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:00:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1562745</guid><dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Bill, I have to disagree I personally hate the auto-collapsing feature of Refactor! &amp;nbsp;I actually decided to remove it purely based on how annoying this &amp;quot;feature&amp;quot; was - perhaps there's a way to disable it.....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I really like the C# implementation and if we can get something like that I think it would be a great time saver.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1562745" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Auto properties : What ifs ...</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bill/archive/2008/03/28/auto-properties-what-ifs.aspx#1558803</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:28:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1558803</guid><dc:creator>bill</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Morgan,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yep, good point. In C# a auto property can have a mixed accessibility, such as :&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;public string Foo { get; private set; }&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1558803" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Auto properties : What ifs ...</title><link>http://msmvps.com/blogs/bill/archive/2008/03/28/auto-properties-what-ifs.aspx#1558762</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:57:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d67277c4-116b-43f1-b688-e9ef184ea916:1558762</guid><dc:creator>Morgan Persson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;For the proposed solution there seems no way to handle a public Get and a protected Set. IIRC C# can do that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msmvps.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1558762" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>