I don't know what is loaded with dv8000z. is it XP Pro, are you having the 'class not registered' error msgs or ? have you install IIS ?
That could be it with new changes in SP1, like component services security enhancement,etc. I have seen many users claimed that this workaround can't be applied to w2k3 sp1.
IIS gone? installation any error ? check the iis6.log at %windir% and look for failed entries.
Renato,
I will try my best, been busy. Now it's typo error. it should be "update.exe /integrated:c:\winxp" according to where you copy the source file. what you are trying to do is integrate the sp2 to the original installation file. and hope this will solve your issue and allow you to install IIS. That article shows how to do it in w2k, but I believe it applies to xp as well. coz you got the downloaded sp2 not SP2 CD. I think you should have update.exe there. it's been a while I applied sp2. I don't have the file now.
Anyway, i know this has taken lot of times. if you need quick and fast response, try post this to public newsgroup - google this online. or contact Microsoft support at your local area. Experts there will help you realtime.
LOL. Thanks WannabeKenobi.
Renato, can you refer to the new KB?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/900871/
since you already extract all the files, just follow method 2 at step4 and make sure you enter the correct path...
I've been busy for past few days, going to travel again...
good luck.
Rafael, can you follow my previous comment to get the xp-sp2 and integrated with orginal installation source first, then retry your installation.
Thanks Ray for sharing your solution.
Did you get the hotfix from MS ? It's been awhile, not sure if MS include this fix in w2k3 sp1. anywhere. assuming you got the fix and after followed the steps, did you restart the computer?
Yes, Soren, you are correct. Back then in 2004 when I replied, this is not possible :)
Yeah, glad you fixed it.
Woohooooooooo.... Glad you have nailed it down.
PingBack from http://www.iis-digest.com/?p=249
Mm.. :) I will pass on the point to the product team.
Oh for step5 is actually related to step6 :) it is about NTFS permissions. so for example to manipulate in XP you can refer to this kb.
How to set, view, change, or remove file and folder permissions in Windows XP
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=308418
Starting Windows 2003 SP1, you will be able to configure SSL with your host header websites . I'm
I just posted a blog about IIS6 compression. I was wondering if IIS7 compression was much different.
So you got the same error again?
Well, feedback already given to product team.
晕。。。还是不行
PingBack from http://adaptive-techniques.net/2006/11/10/iis-kbz
什么不行？ 所有步骤都试了吗？什么错误信息？
I tried all of the above, including adding the IUSER account to Administrators, and I *still* get the 0201 error. Any more ideas?
Mmm.. this is weird. when you register those dll, any error msgs?
This sounds like typical FTP: URL behaviour.
Remember that ftp://user:password@site.example.com/ means to log on to the FTP server at site.example.com, using user "user", and password "password", then CWD to the root, before producing a listing.
Not perhaps what you expect, but not without precedent.
Perhaps you need to configure your FTP server such that it restricts the user's directory structure in such a way that the home directory appears to be the root directory, then you don't have this problem.
Well, this works on IE 6. Next on the restrict part, it needs a mininum read at the root before can redirect. And in user isolation mode, it get stuck in root as well. So something differently changed in IE7 as compare with the previous version.
You mean ... this part of the spec ... RFC 1738 Uniform Resource Locators (URL) December 1994 ... blah ... blah ... blah page 7 ...
For example, the URL <URL:ftp://myname@host.dom/%2Fetc/motd> is
interpreted by FTP-ing to "host.dom", logging in as "myname"
(prompting for a password if it is asked for), and then executing
"CWD /etc" and then "RETR motd". This has a different meaning from
<URL:ftp://myname@host.dom/etc/motd> which would "CWD etc" and then
"RETR motd"; the initial "CWD" might be executed relative to the
default directory for "myname". On the other hand,
<URL:ftp://myname@host.dom//etc/motd>, would "CWD " with a null
argument, then "CWD etc", and then "RETR motd".
I read this as double slash (//) means start from root and single slash is mention as relative. It does say anything about single means root.
Every other browser in the universe I've used works relative path. MS should either justify there position by speaking up or fix there crappy software!
i have a backup certificate with private key and i was tryout import my certificate in IIS but msg appear
Error
CANNOT IMPORT KEY RING BACKUP FILE
Thanks
Yaseen
I agree...something has changed and this is an absolute mess
Interesting. just to check does it work with you import it on another machine of IIS4/5 ? same issue?
Thanks for sharing, Terry. I'm not really a hard and fast RFC fans. I'm just a normal user that expect things to work as it is in IE6.0 :)
It's a bug.
i have one webserver (one IP used) setup on IIS 6.0 and it is working fine. however, if i try to add another (and i do it successfully), i can't open web and i get "The system cannot find the path specified". i tried checking the permissions for IIS_WPG and NETWORK SERVICE. still, no luck. i can't get any site running besides the one i already have.
PLEASE HELP
Hi Mike, what do you mean by 'try to add another' ? another IIS machine or ? have you try reinstall? and any error msgs or event log?
funny
Hehe :) Not just me! You have got the power as well.... to manage IIS via PowerShell. Honestly, I'm not
It's Microsoft "breaking things that used to work" and calling it "more secure". (Yet STILL leaving holes in other areas... and NOT fixing them at all.)
Smart move (again) guys.
PingBack from http://consultmelive.com/2007/01/10/to-fix-http-500-error-on-hp-pavillion-5000-after-dot-net-and-iis-install/
I have a website, when I try to upload aspx pages that made using master page, this error msg displayed:(
And have you try the suggestion above? still experiencing same error?
PingBack from http://center.slimblogs.com/article/667269/IISNET-Download-
3 months after IIS team debut the first preview with Zend , Preview 2 is out! Read the annoucement here
Thanks for posting! A lot of people are very excited about this release, and the upcoming PHP 5.2.1 release that form our foundation for serious PHP support for Windows / IIS. Be sure to check in again at http://mvolo.com through next week for more coverage of it.
Mike
So, tell me what's complicated and I'll do my best to help you. Is it Powershell itself, or is it my explanation of how to use it? Are you coming at this from a developer perspective or an administrator perspective?
To keep it simple, what are your paint points with using Powershell and IIS 7?
Thanks Tobin, actually is the powershell syntax itself, looks like perl language to me :) How does PS complement appcmd.exe?
IMHO, PS could replace appcmd. Putting that notion aside, consider that you can pipe your output to anything else. That output could be a visual gadget, more text output, a file, or a network connection of some sort. You can filter your output how you want. The list goes on. Just like unix shells, the power isn't in typing out long syntax every time you want to do something. It is in your ability to write shell scripts that you can execute with your own syntax.
For instance, instead of typing:
(New-Object Microsoft.Web.Administration.ServerManager).Sites["Default Web Site"]
I can create a simple script function:
function findSite()
{
return (New-Object Microsoft.Web.Administration.ServerManager).Sites[$args[0]]
}
and then from that point on, I simply need to type: findSite("Default Web Site")
I can still pipe that output to anything I want. I can also still format the output however I want.
I suppose as a developer, I find this more appealing that a restrictive command line tool that has a strict syntax.
Cool! so in a way PS provides you more flexibility to manipulate data on top of a query and sort of like 'extending' your management power :)
Exactly! And, as my second blog post on the subject demonstrates, you can extend existing managed code with PowerShell.
Lovely, I know internally the folks here are using PS with WMI for some general management. For me, I think it's time to learn more about the syntax :)
PingBack from http://adaptive-techniques.net/2007/02/09/iis-kbz-2
The WebDAV support discontinuation is -brutal-. Does it make any sense to feature security for Windows Vista and then tell users to use FTP to upload files to IIS, transmitting their credentials in the clear?? Arg.
Joe,
Well, the deal is that Vista is not suppose to be the production web server, hence DAV doesn't include in the bill. For ftp, If i'm not mistaken there'll be out of band ftp component in near future (LH timeframe) which will support ftps, etc.
I just got my MVP award, and I was half expecting to get to the end of the registration process, and at the end it said "Gotcha!"
There is a typo. It should be iwaM, not iwaN.
Oops. thanks man.
LOL... my registration went well. congrats !
Congratulations - me too!
Yeah.. Alun Alun Alun :)
I talked about Vista SKUs and IIS 7 before :) yet it wasn't that clear as of why you might want to pick
Well, I get the not-a-production-server idea, but webDAV isn't just for production servers. It's for testing, too. And it's also for file transfer to your computer when you're outside the intranet, something that is painfully missing in Vista now.
The fact is, when you're a small time operation, you want to use your local IIS to test sites you're working on. Removing webDAV basically means Microsoft is saying, "Don't want to work within the intranet? Get longhorn server." This will require both a software and hardware investment for me, just to be able to upload content from the coffee house. I mean, come on!
RE: SFTP, that would be alright, though I think I read somewhere that was only going to be for Longhorn server. If not, I guess I'll be mollified-- but still grumpy! :-)
Hi Joe, I will try relay the msgs to the product team, but no promise :) and SFTP and FTPS are two different technologies, whereas formal is using secure shell stuff to wrap over the ftp communication, but ftps is pure SSL cert implementation over ftp protocal.
I also miss the WebDAV support (yes for development purposes), any workarounds?
Nope :) ftp maybe ?
Yes
SMTPDiag is a handy tool for tracking down SMTP based issues. I recently used in a newsgroup posting
It is funny. :P
So I now have my new laptop which came bundled with Vista Home Premium. After I had it set up, I then
Hi Bernard,
Thanks for posting about this issue!
You've exposed one of the many cases where runtime validation rules for configuration are different from the base configuration validation rules. This is a necessary evil of the new configuration system - there is simply no way to encode and express the richness of runtime validation into a declarative configuration store. The .NET configuration system is based on code and it can do a little more validation on the configuration system itself, but still not enough to completely describe the validation done by a runtime consumer of it. In most of these cases, we try to do validation at runtime and give decent errors when we detect stuff that doesnt make sense, but then again, this doesnt describe every possible way you could configure the server.
In this case, we consider this behavior a bug in the UI because it does not allow you to correct the condition. From the AppCmd perspective, the delete vdir/create application approach is the answer here. In IIS7, we think a lot more strictly about the difference between vdirs and applications - an application is a completley different beast from vdir unlike IIS6, where it was simply a vdir marked for application isolation. You can read one of my recent posts on the subject here: mvolo.com/.../Creating-IIS7-sites_2C00_-applications_2C00_-and-virtual-directories.aspx.
Thanks,
Thanks Mike, and I do aware of the redefinition between site, vdir and app objects in IIS 7.0 and came out with these.
- A Web site must contain at least one application.
- A Web application must contain a root virtual directory.
- A virtual directory belongs to only one application
Pingback from Scott Hanselman's Computer Zen - 32bitness and 64bitness and migrating DasBlog on IIS7 and ASP.NET under Vista64
Ever wonder where to configure HTTP KEEP-ALIVE in IIS 7.0, or where to configure detail error message
In Vista "home premium", some of these features are missing, like the "http headers"-section. Crippling without good reasons.
Well, this is per windows 2008 server. For Vista, you will have to wait till SP1 or try to configure it via appcmd.exe first.
It is not new design when it breaks things that used to work! Any workaround to get this works?
Hi David,
Yes, I would agreed with you that it should not breaks thing that used to be working. Yet, IE team did it, and they have their reasons behind, etc. why? I have no idea, you can ping them via the team blog url I posted.
And for the workaround? none - afaik. so try windows explorer :) ??
Pingback from internet » Blog Archive » Security Alerts - Microsoft Internet Information Services Could …
Interesting: msmvps.com
Pingback from IIS KBs - October 2007 (More IIS 7 Status Code)
Pingback from hoozingo » Blog Archiv » IIS KBs - October 2007 (More IIS 7 Status Code)
Interesting point at msmvps.com
Pingback from Filezilla Probleme - Server Support Forum
Pingback from Errore con IIS - MasterDrive.it - Information Technology Developers Community
It is hot! with the official release of W2k8 / IIS 7.0 , Microsoft has released more goodies for you
Pingback from error code 8004e00f
Pingback from IIS 7.0 Administration Pack! | Log Parser Tips
Hello
There are some ASP in my computer, but i find it cannot run as well as before when i update iis7 release. It always says there is a error of Microsoft JET Database Engine '80004005' Unspecal...
Your comment is not complete, can you repost or post it to iis.net forum. thanks.
iis requried so thanks
Pingback from class not registered
duh, about time someone documented this! thanks ;)
Pingback from IIS - Internal Server Error, Class not registered « Caveman’s Blog
Unfortunately the URLSCan and Scrawlr only able to detect through SQL Injection that is through querystring.
correct?
For the urlscan the the hp scrawlr, both are done via http request and no source code is needed. Again, scarwlr is use to detect, while urlscan is defend, both didn't fix the issue at root.
Pingback from Message stuck in Microsoft SMTP service Queue « Axelilly’s Ponderings
Pingback from Interessante Links - Tom Schimana
Pingback from Windows 2008 Security - Top 8 - Web 2.0 Security Threats
technically the #2 and #6 are mainly developer issues. When developer fail to write quality code, you going going to suffer :)
Nice! congrats too!!!
after a year only i realize I'm same batch as u :)
Zzz.. same batch! ok, I quit!!!
Quick questions on IIS:
Can I downgrade IIS 6 to IIS 5.1 on Win2003 Server machine?
I am having problems with Response Buffer and the easiest way out for now is to downgrade to 5.1 as I haven't fully tested my app on version 6. If it is possible, can I just simply uninstall 6.0 and install 5.1? Is it even possible to use 5.1 on a Win2003 server?
Appreciate your help as I know you're an expert on the subject.
Thanks!
Ohh. I have replied you in email as well.
>>
You can't. with W2k3, you get IIS 6. IIS 5.1 is only for XP Pro 32bit edition (except home edition).
What's the reponse buffer error msgs anyway?
hahahahahah, dont lah like that :P
when will you be in KL? let's go for coffee 1 day
@@ sure.. 1 day.. say today?
A year ago... Cesar Cerrudo presented a serious vulnerability via evalvation of privilege involving the
Pingback from Troubleshooting SMTP Issues in Windows & IIS » Virtual Memory
Grab this badge here!