Dreaming of the future...

Here are some technologies I just can't wait for:

  • OLEDs:
    • for room lighting - ambient light from ceiling-tile sized light panels [those of us that suffer migraines want an alternative to fluorescent lights, compact or otherwise]
    • for either back-lighting of LCD screens, or for the screen itself - I didn't know until after I bought it that my laptop uses a fluorescent bulb for the backlight. When the battery gets low, I can see it flicker, and I have to turn it off or risk another migraine.
    • Are they green? They're any colour you want, baby!
    • Oh, you mean are they ecologically sound? Far more so than incandescent, fluorescent, effervescent, evanescent or putrescent. Incandescent bulbs burn way more power; fluorescent bulbs have mercury - and, surprisingly, burn way more power for the amount of light they put out than equivalent LEDs or OLEDs.
    • OLEDs are cool to the touch - perhaps in some climates this means you'll have to run your heater more, but really, you don't think a light-bulb is an efficient heat generator, do you?
  • Multi-touch support, including fingertip and stylus support.
    • Windows 7 (which I thought would be called "Viista") will feature multi-touch support, where users will grab objects with a couple of fingers, to more naturally twist and scale them.
    • Stylus support would allow drawing and writing - I wish I had an excuse to get a Tablet PC, but I just can't afford to sacrifice power in order to get that capability. Maybe I'll buy a cheap USB tablet to plug in at the side.
  • Single sign-on through the use of federated identity.
    • Okay, that one probably needs some explanation.
    • I'm tired - so tired - of one password here, a different password there, here I'm "alunj", there I'm "aljones", another place I'm ma7amj, yet another place AMJ10.
    • I want to enter one user name, one password, and be able to authenticate to everywhere.
    • Of course, that would mean everywhere would have to trust the one user name and one password - and if that isn't carefully monitored, you'll see people tying their bank accounts and nuclear secrets to a one character password. This requires some thought.
  • Transflective displays.
    • Tra-wha?
    • Put simply, if it's light enough to read a piece of paper, I want to be able to use my laptop. And if it's really, really bright, I want to be able to use my laptop.
    • No backlights - I want the screen to be like coloured paper, reflecting ambient light.
    • That'll cut down on weight, battery consumption, and probably also frame rate in games. Can't have everything :)
  • Wi-tricity
    • Wireless electricity.
    • Sure, it's going to bombard me with electrons, but only if I'm resonant. Otherwise, it'll power my technology without requiring that it all be tethered to the wall.
  • Wide-spread adoption of IPv6
    • Heck, even though Microsoft installs IPv6 by default in Vista and Server 2008, there still isn't an IPv6-based Microsoft "front page".
    • www.ipv6.microsoft.com has been dead for months.
    • Akamai, which hosts www.microsoft.com, doesn't appear to know about IPv6.
    • IPv6 brings us back to the way that nature intended the Internet to be - everyone's a peer node; everyone can be a server. Firewalls are firewalls, and NATs are non-existent.
Published Sun, Jul 12 2009 16:41 by Alun Jones

Comments

# re: Dreaming of the future...

It should be noted that LEDs can flicker too, when powered by AC.  I would assume this can be relatively easily addressed in the circuitry, but I wonder whether or not this will happen.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009 11:02 PM by Harry Johnston

# re: Dreaming of the future...

I'd hope the LEDs are powered through a rectified and smoothed source (aka DC) to prevent flicker. Not to emphasise the 'superhuman' aspect too much, but I see flicker where most people don't, and I know people who see flicker where I don't. Sensitivity to flicker clearly varies, and it'd be nice if lighting designs took that into consideration.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009 11:38 PM by Alun Jones

# re: Dreaming of the future...

I'm hoping to see supercapacitors able to be built onto an integrated circuit at some point.  I'm no electrical engineer, so I may be mistaken, but I think this would allow cheap and fairly efficient power conversion - because LEDs need a DC current source to operate at full power, it should be cheaper to convert to DC than to not to.  This would also mean no more separate power converters for laptops and suchlike devices, as well as probably having implications for efficient transport of power.

It may be a bit too speculative, but you can add this to your list if you like. :-)

re: I don't think that's possible

First, please note that I'm not a microelectronics expert, or even a talented amateur. Having said that, I think that you've got to remember that an 'air gap' is a primitive capacitor, whose capacitance is related to the width of the gap. On an integrated circuit, the capacitance between neighbouring tracks is small enough to allow significant current flow. I don't think that track distances on modern ICs give you enough of an air gap to allow for a large capacitance that would be necessary to smooth the power. That's not to say that there aren't non-capacitative methods of smoothing...

Reminder: I don't know anything about microelectronics, so the above may be rubbish.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 5:27 PM by Alun Jones

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 6:18 PM by Harry Johnston

# re: Dreaming of the future...

Wi-tricity gets my vote above all others.  Fed up of having to carry chargers around all time!

Tuesday, July 21, 2009 2:58 PM by Mosh

# Comcast aims for the future

I’m visiting the in-laws in Texas this weekend, and I use the SSTP VPN in Windows Server 2008 R2 to connect

Saturday, March 20, 2010 7:33 PM by Tales from the Crypto

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
If you can't read this number refresh your screen
Enter the numbers above: