Which one of these pictures pisses you off more?

Published Tue, Apr 26 2005 20:48 | William
    They could both be hoaxes but   like her or hate her, Michelle Malkin is a pretty straight shooter as far as getting her facts straight.  Assuming neither of them is a Dan Rather, which one pisses you off more?  Personally it's close for me but I guess a TV Station in the U.S. publicly displaying a sign that crosses out the “CA” from “Los Angeles, CA” and replacing it with Mexico is pretty egregious.  Isn't there enough bad blood as it is over immigration?  Doesn't stuff like this just fan the flames?  And WTF is up with Bush?  Man if it was SpongeBob holding another man's hand, we know how the “The Purple TelleTubby is gay” crowd would be responding        
Filed under:

Comments

# William said on April 27, 2005 9:46 AM:

Probably the second one - the first one is just a statement of fact. :) The second one shows just how badly the "defender's of the faith"* have sold out. I wish there was a rational political party to vote for...

* yes, I mean that in both the ironic sense, and the Judas Priest literal sense.

# William said on April 27, 2005 11:28 AM:

I would have to say the first one - especially if I was a resident of California.

Bush holding hands with the Saudi is not that bad, in the Middle East, when a man holds another man's hand, it is a sign of trusted friendship - just make sure that the women are totally covered in their burkas and walking 6 feet behind then men, then everything will be all right. :\

OT: I would love to bang Michelle Malkin! Damn she is HOT!

Search

This Blog

Tags

Community

Archives

News

My other sites

Cool Stuff

Book Stuff

Security

ORM

Data Access

Funny Stuff

Compact Framework Stuff

Web Casts

My KnowledgeBase Articles

My MVP Profile

Design Patterns

Performance

Debugging

Remoting

My Fellow Authors

My Books

LINQ

Misc

Speech

Syndication

Email Notifications